Article published in:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 29:1 (2014) ► pp. 4985
References

References

Aboh, Enoch O.
2009Simplicity, simplification, complexity and complexification: Where have all the interfaces gone? In Enoch O. Aboh & Norval Smith (eds.), Complex processes in new languages , 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arends, Jacques
2001Simple grammars, complex languages. Linguistic Typology 5(2/3). 180–182.Google Scholar
Aston, Guy & Lou Burnard
1998 The BNC handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Philip
1995Motivation in creole genesis. In Philip Baker (ed.), From contact to creole and beyond , 3–15. London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
1997Directionality in pidginization and creolization. In Arthur K. Spears & Donald Winford (eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles , 91–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002No creolisation without prior pidginisation. In Terry Crowley & Jeff Siegel (eds.), Studies in creole linguistics in memory of Chris Corne, 1942-1999 (Te Reo 44) , 31–50. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall & Ingo Plag.
2011Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1). 5–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen
2000 Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use . Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
Bussmann, Hadumod, Gregory Trauth & Kerstin Kazzazi
1996 Routledge Dictionary of language and linguistics . New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrne, Francis
1987 Grammatical relations in a radical creole: Verb complementation in Saramaccan . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert
2001 Creolization of language and culture (revised in collaboration with Salikoko S. Mufwene) . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Craats, Ineke van de, Norbert Corver & Roeland van Hout
2000Conservation of grammatical knowledge: On the acquisition of possessive noun phrases by Turkish and Moroccan learners of Dutch. Linguistics 38. 221–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Danchev, Andrei
1992The evidence for analytic and synthetic developments in English. In Matti Rissannen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics , 25–41. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, Michel
1999Creolization, language change, and language acquisition: An epilogue. In Michel DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development , 473–543. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005Morphology and word order in ‘creolization’ and beyond. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax , 293–372. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
2007Clitics in English. English Studies 88. 574–600. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, John J., Edward C. Holliman & Jane McDaniel
1992SWITCHBOARD: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. IEEE International Conference on Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP-92 , 517–520.
Greenbaum, Sidney
(ed.) 1996 Comparing English worldwide: The International Corpus of English . Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1960A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of language. International Journal of American Linguistics 26(3). 178–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2011The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45(1). 31–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1954Two models of grammatical description. Word 10. 210–231.Google Scholar
Holm, John & Peter L. Patrick
(eds.) 2007 Comparative creole syntax: Parallel outlines of 18 creole grammars . London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Inoue, Aya
2007Copula patterns in Hawai‘i Creole: Creole origin and decreolization. In Magnus Huber & Viveka Velupillai (eds.), Synchronic and diachronic perspectives on contact languages , 199–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, Eric
1995Crosslinguistic influence: Transfer to nowhere? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 15. 125–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang & Clive Perdue
1997The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13. 301–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kusters, Wouter
2003 Linguistic complexity: The influence of social change on verbal inflection . Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2008Complexity in linguistic theory, language learning and language change. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change , 3–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip
1994 Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar . London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
McWhorter, John
2007 Language interrupted: Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars . Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber
(eds.) 2013 Atlas of pidgin and creole language structures online . Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. http://​apicsonline​.info​/languages​/64.
Miestamo, Matti
2009Implicational hierarchies and grammatical complexity. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable , 80–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike
1980 Tolai and Tok Pisin: The influence of the substratum on the development of New Guinea Pidgin . Canberra: Australian National University (Pacific Linguistics B-73). Google Scholar
Morales, Rodney
1988 The speed of darkness . Honolulu: Bamboo Ridge Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
2001 The ecology of language evolution . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter & Norval Smith
1995The study of pidgin and creole languages. In Jacques Arends, Pieter Muysken & Norval Smith (eds.), Pidgins and creoles: An introduction , 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
2009Linguistic complexity: A comprehensive definition and survey. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as a variable concept , 110–125 . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael
2008The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Matti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change , 265–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1988 Pidgin and creole languages . London: Longman. Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921 Language: An introduction to the study of speech . New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.Google Scholar
Schwegler, Armin
1990 Analyticity and syntheticity: A diachronic perspective with special reference to Romance languages . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A. M. & Herman Wekker
1986Semantic transparency as a factor in creole genesis. In Pieter Muysken & Norval Smith (eds.), Substrata versus universals in creole genesis , 57–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Jeff
2003Substrate influence in creoles and the role of transfer in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25. 185–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 The emergence of pidgin and creole languages . Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012Accounting for analyticity in creoles. In Bernd Kortmann & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (eds.), Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact , 35–61. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Geoff P.
2002 Growing up with Tok Pisin: Contact, creolization, and change in Papua New Guinea’s national language . London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2009Typological parameters of intralingual variability: Grammatical analyticity versus syntheticity in varieties of English. Language Variation and Change 21(3). 319–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Nuria Hernández
2007 Manual of information to accompany the Freiburg Corpus of English Dialects Sampler (‘FRED-S’) . URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:25-opus-28598 . Freiburg: University of Freiburg. http://​www​.freidok​.uni​-freiburg​.de​/volltexte​/2859/ (20 September 2013.)
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Bernd Kortmann
2009Between simplification and complexification: Non-standard varieties of English around the world. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable , 64–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
2011Typological profiling: Learner Englishes versus indigenized L2 varieties of English. In Joybrato Mukherjee & Marianne Hundt (eds.), Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap , 167–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trask, Robert L.
1993 A dictionary of grammatical terms in linguistics . London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
Wekker, Herman
1996Creolization and the acquisition of English as a second language. In Herman Wekker (ed.), Creole languages and language acquisition , 139–149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

No author info given
2015.  In Pidgins, Creoles and Mixed Languages [Creole Language Library, 48], Crossref logo
Bakker, Peter
2016. Creoles as hybrid languages. <i>WORD</i> 62:4  pp. 228 ff. Crossref logo
Blasi, Damián E., Susanne Maria Michaelis & Martin Haspelmath
2017. Grammars are robustly transmitted even during the emergence of creole languages. Nature Human Behaviour 1:10  pp. 723 ff. Crossref logo
Bogolyubova, Olga, Polina Panicheva, Roman Tikhonov, Viktor Ivanov & Yanina Ledovaya
2018. Dark personalities on Facebook: Harmful online behaviors and language. Computers in Human Behavior 78  pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Good, Jeff
2015. Paradigmatic complexity in pidgins and creoles. Word Structure 8:2  pp. 184 ff. Crossref logo
Haspelmath, Martin & Susanne Maria Michaelis
2017.  In Language Variation - European Perspectives VI [Studies in Language Variation, 19],  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Kouwenberg, Silvia & John Victor Singler
2018. Creolization in Context: Historical and Typological Perspectives. Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Röthlisberger, Melanie & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2019.  In Handbook of the Changing World Language Map,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Röthlisberger, Melanie & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2020.  In Handbook of the Changing World Language Map,  pp. 131 ff. Crossref logo
Siegel, Jeff
2015. The role of substrate transfer in the development of grammatical morphology in language contact varieties. Word Structure 8:2  pp. 160 ff. Crossref logo
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Melanie Röthlisberger
2019.  In The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes,  pp. 534 ff. Crossref logo
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
2019.  In Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.