Review published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 3:2 (1988) ► pp.296303
References
Bickerton, Derek
1981Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Boretzky, Norbert
1983Kreolsprachen, Substrate und Sprachwandel. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Holm, John
forthcoming. Pidgins and creoles. Cambridge: University Press.
Lefebvre, Claire
1986Relexification in creole genesis revisited: The case of Haitian Creole. In Muysken and Smith, 279–300.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire and Diane Massam
1987The core syntax of Haitian. Paper presented at the Workshop on Creole Syntax, University of Amsterdam.
Mühlhàusler, Peter
1986aBonnet blanc et blanc bonnet: Adjective-noun order, substratum, and language universals. In Muysken and Smith, 41–55.Google Scholar
1986bPidgin and creole linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko
1986The universalist and substrate hypotheses complement one another. In Muysken and Smith, 129–62.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter, and Norval Smith
1986 (eds.) Substrata versus universals in creole genesis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo
1883Kreolische Studien III-VI. Sitzungsberichte der Wiener Akademie 1031.3–17; 1051.111–50, 131–61. 882–904.Google Scholar
1909Die Lingua Franca. Zeitschrift fur romanische Philologie 331.441–61.Google Scholar
Schumann, John
1978The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Smith, Norval
1987The genesis of the creole languages of Surinam. University of Amsterdam dissertation.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Leo
1976 (ed.). Hugo Schuchardt-Brevier. Ein Vademecum der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas
1986Gibt es das kreolische Sprachwandelmodell? Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar