Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 31:1 (2016) ► pp.16–41

The Present Perfect borders

A study in language contact

 | Indiana University, Bloomington, USA
This paper analyzes the properties of the Present Perfect in Barranquenho/Barranqueño, a contact variety spoken in the southern border of Portugal and Spain. In this variety, the Present Perfect displays a mixed structure: while the forms of auxiliary and participle are from Portuguese, its range of interpretations is not attested in Portuguese but rather in Spanish. As in other domains of the grammar of Barranquenho that have been studied, the Present Perfect displays features attributable to Portuguese and to Spanish. These findings are discussed against hypotheses regarding the emergence of this contact variety as well as the theoretical debate concerning the relation between language contact and second language acquisition.
Keywords: Present Perfect, Barranquenho/Barranqueño, mixed languages, language contact
Published online: 10 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.31.1.02ama
References (38)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2002. Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Amaral, Patrícia & Chad Howe. 2012. Nominal and verbal plurality in the diachrony of the Portuguese present perfect. In Brenda Laca & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Verbal plurality and distributivity, 25–53. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2005. Another piece of the puzzle: The acquisition of the present perfect. Language Learning 51(1). 215–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia, Brenda Laca, & Sandra de Carvalho. 2010. When perfect means plural: The present perfect in North-Eastern Brazilian Portuguese. In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Brenda Laca (eds.), Layers of aspect, 67–102. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Campos, Maria Henriqueta C. 1986. L’opposition du portugais Pretérito Perfeito Simples - Pretérito Perfeito Composto: un cas singulier dans l’ensemble des langues romanes. Morphosyntaxe des Langues Romanes. Actes du XVIIe Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes (Aix-en –Provence), 411–422.Google Scholar
Clements, Joseph Clancy, Patrícia Amaral, & Ana Luís. Continuidade e inovação na morfossintaxe do Barranquenho. In Ángel Marcos de Dios (ed.), Aula Ibérica. Relaciones lingüísticas y literarias entre Portugal y España (siglos XIX y XX), 305–316, Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
Clements, Joseph Clancy. 2009. The linguistic legacy of Spanish and Portuguese: Colonial expansion and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, Joseph Clancy, Patrícia Amaral, & Ana Luís. 2008. Cultural identity and the structure of a mixed language: The case of Barranquenho. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 34 , Special session on Pidgins, Creoles, and Mixed Languages.
. 2011. Spanish in contact with Portuguese: The case of Barranquenho. In Manuel Díaz-Campos (ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics, 395–417. Oxford: Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Victor. 2012. Language contact. In Robert Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 398–427. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi. 1997. Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador. 1999. Los dativos. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, 1855–1930. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Howe, Chad. 2007. A semantic/pragmatic analysis of present perfects in Peninsular Spanish. In Jon Cihlar, Amy Franklin, Dave Kaiser, & Irene Kimbara (eds.), Papers from the 39th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 144–161, Chicago.Google Scholar
. 2013. The Spanish perfects: Pathways of emergent meaning. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laca, Brenda. 2010. Perfect semantics: How universal are Ibero-American present perfects? In Claudia Borgonovo, Manuel Español-Echevaría, & Philippe Prévost (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 1–16. Sommerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Mateus, Maria Helena Mira, Inês Duarte, & Isabel Hub Faria. 2003. Gramática da Língua Portuguesa. Lisboa: Caminho.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Peter Bakker (eds.). 2003. The mixed language debate. Theoretical and empirical advances. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2007. The borrowability of structural categories. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 31–73. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
McCoard, Robert. 1978. The English perfect: Tense choice and pragmatic inferences. Amsterdam: North Holland Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Navas, Sánchez-Élez & María Victoria. 2000. Procesos de creación de las lenguas fronterizas. Revista de Filología Románica 171. 367–393.Google Scholar
. 2011. El barranqueño. Un modelo de lenguas en contacto. Editorial Complutense & Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Nunes, José J. 1989. Compêndio de Gramática Histórica Portuguesa (Fonética e Morfologia). Lisboa: Livraria Clássica Editora.Google Scholar
Pienemann, Manfred, Bruno Di Biase, Satomi Kawaguchi, & Gisela Håkansson. 2005. Processing constraints on L1 transfer. In Judith F. Kroll & Annette M.B. de Groot (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism. Psycholinguistic approaches, 128–153. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2010. Creoles, interlanguages, processing and transfer: A response to Sprouse. Acquisition et interaction en Langue (Aile) 2009(2). 165–170. [URL] (7 February, 2013).Google Scholar
. 2011. Creolization and admixture. Typology, feature pools, and second language acquisition. In Parth Bhatt & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Creoles and Typology: Special issue of Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1), 233. 89–110.Google Scholar
Rathert, Monika. 2012. Adverbials. In Robert Binick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 237–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salvador Plans, Antonio. 1981. ¿Tres pueblos de habla extremeña en Andalucía? Anuario de Estudios Filológicos 41. 221–231.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Liliana. 2006. Bilingual grammars and creoles: Similarities between functional convergence and morphological elaboration. In Claire Lefebvre, Lydia White, & Christine Jourdan (eds.), L2 Acquisition and creole genesis, 277–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Cristina. 2001. Cross-linguistic variation and the present perfect: The case of Portuguese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 191. 403–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott Adam. 1994. The grammaticalization of an anterior in progress: Evidence from a Peninsular Spanish dialect. Studies in Language 181. 71–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott Adam & Rena Torres Cacoullos. 2008. Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The ‘perfect’ road to perfective. Language Variation and Change 201. 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 2006. Links between SLA and creole studies: Past and present. In Claire Lefebvre, Lydia White, & Christine Jourdan (eds.), L2 acquisition and creole genesis, 15–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The emergence of Pidgin and Creole languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Language contact and second language acquisition. In William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia (eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition, 569–589. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario & Pier Marco Bertinetto. 2000. The simple and compound past in Romance languages. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 403–439. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, José L. de. 1955. Filologia Barranquenha. Apontamentos para o seu estudo. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional - Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar
Zamora Vicente, Alonso. 1974. Dialectología española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Alonso Pascua, Borja
2021. El pretérito perfecto compuesto en las hablas fronterizas hispano-portuguesas: transferencias semánticas y morfológicas. Revista de Filología Románica 38 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.