Critical mass in Michif
In this paper, we examine mass and count in Michif, a language often called a mixed language, which has elements from French (and English) and Cree (and Ojibwe). French has an obvious grammatical mass/count distinction (Doetjes 1997); Cree does not. Michif could therefore display a mass/count distinction, like French, or look like it lacks one, like Cree. In fact, the system is mixed (contra Croft 2003: 58): French-derived nominals display an obvious mass/count distinction and the Cree-derived nominals do not. Number, numerals and quantifiers disambiguate within the French-derived part of the grammar but do not in the Cree-derived part. Michif has inherited both the French system and the Cree system, reflected in the behaviour of the nominals.
References
Ahenakew, Freda & H. Christoph Wolfart
1983 Productive reduplication in Plains Cree. In
William Cowan (ed.),
Actes du quatorzième congrès des Algonquinistes (Québec, 1982), 369–377. Ottawa: Carleton University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bakker, Peter
1997 A language of our own: The genesis of Michif, the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Métis (
Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics). New York: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bale, Alan C. & David Barner
2009 The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction.
Journal of Semantics 261. 217–252.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bale, Alan C. & David Barner
2012 Semantic triggers, linguistic variation, and the mass-count distinction. In
Diane Massam (ed.),
Count and mass across languages, 238–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bunt, Harry C
1985 Mass Terms and Model-Theoretic Semantics.
Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma
1999 Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP.
Linguistic Inquiry 301. 509–542.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, Gennaro
1998 Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In
Susan Rothstein (ed.),
Events and grammar, 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, Gennaro
2010 Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation.
Synthese 174(1). 99–149.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William
2003 Mixed languages and acts of identity: An evolutionary approach. In
Yaron Matras &
Peter Bakker (eds.),
The mixed language debate: Theoretical and empirical advances, 41–72. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deprez, Viviane
2005 Morphological number, semantic number and bare nouns.
Lingua 1151. 857–883.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Doetjes, Jenny
1997 Quantifiers and selection: On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. Leiden, NL: Leiden University dissertation.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frantz, Donald G & Norma Jean Russell
1989 Blackfoot dictionary of stems, roots, and affixes. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gillon, Carrie
2009 The mass/count distinction and what it tells us about plurality in Innu-aimun. Paper given at
the Semantics of Underrepresented Languages of the Americas V
, May 15-17, 2009, Harvard and MIT.
Gillon, Carrie
2015 Innu-aimun plurality.
Lingua 1621:128–148.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray
1991 Parts and boundaries.
Cognition 411: 9–45.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, Otto
1909 The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacKenzie, Marguerite
1980 Toward a dialectology of Cree-Montagnaiss-Naskapi. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto dissertation. [available at
[URL]]
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mathieu, Éric
2012 On the mass/count distinction in Ojibwe. In
Diane Massam (ed.),
Count and mass across languages, 172–198. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pelletier, Francis Jeffry
1975 Non-singular reference: Some preliminaries.
Philosophia 5.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rhodes, Richard
1986 Métchif: a second look.
Proceedings of the Algonquian Conference 171: 287–96.
William Conan, ed. Ottawa: Carleton University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rhodes, Richard. A
1990 Lexical hierarchies and Ojibwa noun derivation. In
Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.),
Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization, 151–158. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosen, Nicole
2003 Demonstrative position in Michif.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48(1/2). 39–69.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosen, Nicole
2006 Language contact and Michif stress assignment.
Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung - Language Typology and Universals (STUF) 59(2). 170–190.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosen, Nicole
2007 Domains in Michif phonology. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto dissertation. Available at:
[URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosen, Nicole & Janelle Brodner
2012 Vowel space of Michif. Paper presented at 2012 Meeting of the
Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas
, January 5-8, 2012, Portland, OR.
Statistics Canada
2011 Census of Population, Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-314-XCB2011048.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thomason, Sarah
2003 Social factors and linguistic processes in the emergence of stable mixed languages. In
Yaron Matras &
Peter Bakker (eds.),
The mixed language debate: Theoretical and empirical advances, 21–39. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilhelm, Andrea
2008 Bare nouns and number in Dëne Sųłiné.
Natural Language Semantics 161. 39–68.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiltschko, Martina
2012 Decomposing the mass/count distinction: Evidence from languages that lack it. In
Diane Massam (ed.),
Count and mass across languages, 146–171. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Meakins, Felicity & Jesse Stewart
2022.
Mixed Languages. In
The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact,
► pp. 310 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
[no author supplied]
2022.
Contact, Emergence, and Language Classification. In
The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact,
► pp. 255 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.