Column published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 32:2 (2017) ► pp.398415
Baptista, Marlyse
2017Competition and selection in creole genesis: How "minimalist" languages yield maximal output. Guest Column (3). Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 32(1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016aCreole formation and L2 acquisition: On re-evaluating processes and labels. Guest Column (2). Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31(2). 361–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Continuum and variation in creole languages: Out of many voices, one language. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 30(2). 225–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth & Brian MacWhinney
1987Competition, variation and language learning. In Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language change, 157–193. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel
2016Why nurture is natural too. Biolinguistics 101. 197–201.Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa
2004Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, US: Bradford Books, Publishers, Incorporated.Google Scholar
Holm, John
1988Pidgins and Creoles, Vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, Jairo Nunes & Kleanthes Grohmann
2005Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Page, R. B. & Andrée Tabouret-Keller
Lightfoot, David
2006How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: Cambride University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ligthfoot, David
2016Rethinking catastrophes and big, gross data. Manuscript.
Lipski, John
n.d. On the source of the infinitive in Romance-derived pidgins and creoles. Manuscript.
MacWhinney, Brian & Elizabeth Bates
(eds.) 1989The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko & Martha Dijkhoff
1989On the so-called infinitives in Atlantic Creoles. Lingua 77(3-4). 297–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko
2001The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Language evolution: Contact, competition and change. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam
2015Introducing sociolinguistics, 2nd ed. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunes, José
1945Compêndio de Gramática Histórica Portuguesa. Lisboa: Livraria Clásica Editora.Google Scholar
Obata, Miki & Samuel Epstein
2015Eliminating parameters from the narrow syntax: Rule ordering variation by third factor underspecification.
2016Eliminating parameters from the narrow syntax: Rule ordering variation by thirdfactor underspecification. In Advances in Biolinguistics: The Human Language Faculty and Its Biological Basis, 128–138. Taylor and Francis Inc. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obata, Miki, Samuel Epstein & Marlyse Baptista
2015Can crosslinguistically variant grammars be formally identical? Third factor under specification and the possible elimination of parameters of UG. Lingua 1561. 1–16 [online version first appeared in 2014]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, Fernão
1536A Gramática da Linguagem Portuguesa. Lisboa: Casa da Moeda. Reprinted in 1975.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas
1999Universal Bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(3). 169–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo
1881Anzeige von: C. Baissac, Étude sur le patois créole mauricien. F. Adolpho Coelho, Os dialectos romanicos ou neo-latinos na Africa, Asia e America. Zeitschrift für rom. Philologie 51. 580–581.Google Scholar
Teyssier, Paul
1959La Langue de Gil Vicente. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles
2002Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar