Cover not available
To be specified published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 32:2 (2017) ► pp.398–415
Guest Column

Competing I-grammars in creole genesis

A synchronic and diachronic view

| University of Michigan |
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The traditional creole continuum
    • 2.1A variety of perspectives on the continuum
    • 2.2The creole continuum and its limitations: Lack of descriptive and explanatory adequacy
  • 3.Variation and competing I-grammars
    • 3.1I-language vs. E-language and I-language vs. multiple I-languages
  • 4.Variation in the auxiliary domain of Cape Verdean Creole
    • 4.1Defining the variable and its variants
    • 4.2The Cape Verdean variable and its variants
  • 5.Competing I-languages in diachrony
  • 6.On the nature and development of I-grammars
    • 6.1Revisiting the original puzzle
    • 6.2Tying a loose end: accounting for competing co-existing forms
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.32.2.07bap
References
Baptista, Marlyse
2017 Competition and selection in creole genesis: How "minimalist" languages yield maximal output. Guest Column (3). Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 32(1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016a Creole formation and L2 acquisition: On re-evaluating processes and labels. Guest Column (2). Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31(2). 361–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b Stepping back to move forward: An introspection on the history of some key questions driving our field. Guest Column (1). Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 31(1). 184–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Continuum and variation in creole languages: Out of many voices, one language. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 30(2). 225–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth & Brian MacWhinney
1987 Competition, variation and language learning. In Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language change, 157–193. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel
2016 Why nurture is natural too. Biolinguistics 101. 197–201.Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa
2004 Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, US: Bradford Books, Publishers, Incorporated.Google Scholar
Holm, John
1988 Pidgins and Creoles, Vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, Jairo Nunes & Kleanthes Grohmann
2005 Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Page, R. B. & Andrée Tabouret-Keller
1986 Acts of Identity: Creole-based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
2006 How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: Cambride University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ligthfoot, David
2016 Rethinking catastrophes and big, gross data. Manuscript.
Lipski, John
n.d. On the source of the infinitive in Romance-derived pidgins and creoles. Manuscript.
MacWhinney, Brian & Elizabeth Bates
(eds.) 1989 The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko & Martha Dijkhoff
1989 On the so-called infinitives in Atlantic Creoles. Lingua 77(3-4). 297–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko
2001 The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Language evolution: Contact, competition and change. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam
2015 Introducing sociolinguistics, 2nd ed. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunes, José
1945 Compêndio de Gramática Histórica Portuguesa. Lisboa: Livraria Clásica Editora.Google Scholar
Obata, Miki & Samuel Epstein
2015 Eliminating parameters from the narrow syntax: Rule ordering variation by third factor underspecification.
2016 Eliminating parameters from the narrow syntax: Rule ordering variation by thirdfactor underspecification. In Advances in Biolinguistics: The Human Language Faculty and Its Biological Basis, 128–138. Taylor and Francis Inc. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obata, Miki, Samuel Epstein & Marlyse Baptista
2015 Can crosslinguistically variant grammars be formally identical? Third factor under specification and the possible elimination of parameters of UG. Lingua 1561. 1–16 [online version first appeared in 2014]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, Fernão
1536 A Gramática da Linguagem Portuguesa. Lisboa: Casa da Moeda. Reprinted in 1975.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas
1999 Universal Bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(3). 169–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo
1881 Anzeige von: C. Baissac, Étude sur le patois créole mauricien. F. Adolpho Coelho, Os dialectos romanicos ou neo-latinos na Africa, Asia e America. Zeitschrift für rom. Philologie 51. 580–581.Google Scholar
Teyssier, Paul
1959 La Langue de Gil Vicente. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles
2002 Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar