Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 4:1 (2018) ► pp.46–72

Engaging the senses

A sensory-based approach to L2 pronunciation instruction for actors

| Concordia University,
| Concordia University,
This case study examined the benefits of a sensory-based approach for teaching second language pronunciation to actors, addressing the unique learning goal of nativelike speech for nonnative professional actors. Two French Canadian actors (Marianne and Sebastian) were followed over 10 weeks of pronunciation instruction based on Knight’s (2012) theatrical voice methods and Gibson’s (1969) principles of sensory learning. Audio samples from scripted performances before and after instruction were rated for global and linguistic measures by 10 linguistically trained listeners and for performance measures by 10 advanced acting students. Listener ratings showed a significant improvement in accentedness for Marianne and greater comprehensibility for both actors, while qualitative data revealed actors’ preferences for different types of instruction. Results suggest that sensory learning appears beneficial for some learners and that pronunciation instruction could be supplemented with sensory-based activities.
Keywords: pronunciation instruction, theatre, sensory-based learning, classroom-based teaching, case study
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theatre and drama techniques in L2 pronunciation teaching
  • 3.Sensory training for teaching L2 pronunciation to actors
  • 4.The current study
  • 5.Method
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Teaching approach
    • 5.3Materials and procedure
    • 5.4Speech rating
    • 5.5Data analysis
  • 6.1Results
    • 6.1Accentedness and comprehensibility
    • 6.2Linguistic and theatrical measures
    • 6.3Weekly surveys
    • 6.4Exit interviews
  • 7.Discussion
    • 7.1Nativeness as a learning goal
    • 7.2Different learning paths
    • 7.3Sensory instruction for L2 pronunciation
  • 8.Limitations and further research
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 31 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.00003.cer
References (46)
References
Acton, B., Baker, A., Burri, M., & Teaman, B. (2013). Preliminaries to haptic-integrated pronunciation instruction. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 234–244). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Aiguo, W. (2007). Teaching aviation English in the Chinese context: Developing ESL theory in a non-English speaking country. English for Specific Purposes, 261, 121–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banks, J. A. (2006) Democracy, diversity, and social justice: Educating citizens for the public interest in a global age. In G. Ladson-Billings & W. F. Tate (Eds.), Education research in the public interest: Social justice, action, and policy (pp. 141–157). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. (2011). Standard speech practices and pedagogy: A snapshot of the moment. Voice and Speech Review, 71, 224–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carey, M. D., Mannell, R. H., & Dunn, P. K. (2011). Does a rater’s familiarity with a candidate’s pronunciation affect the rating in oral proficiency interviews? Language Testing, 281, 201–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A coursebook and reference guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Couper, G. (2006). The short and long-term effects of pronunciation instruction. Prospect, 211, 46–66.Google Scholar
(2011). What makes pronunciation teaching work? Testing for the effect of two variables: Socially constructed metalanguage and critical listening. Language Awareness, 201, 159–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Copeman, P. (2012). Performing English: Adapting actor voice training techniques for TESOL to improve pronunciation intelligibility. English Australia Journal, 271, 17–33.Google Scholar
de Saint Léger, D., & Storch, N. (2009). Learners’ perceptions and attitudes: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 371, 269–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teachers and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 481, 393–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esling, J. H., & Wong, R. F. (1983). Voice quality settings and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 171, 89–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fine, P. (1999). Quiet! Action! Speak American! Quebec actors are turning to a U.S. speech therapist to expunge accents unwanted by Hollywood. The Globe and Mail, 1–2.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, C. (2003). Structured breathing. VASTA Newsletter, 171, 1–3.Google Scholar
Foote, J. A., Trofimovich, P., Collins, L., & Soler Urzúa, F. (2016). Pronunciation teaching practices in communicative ESL classes. The Language Learning Journal, 441, 181–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, H. (2001). Teaching pronunciation: A handbook for teachers and trainers. Canberra: DETYA.Google Scholar
Galante, A., & Thomson, R. I. (2016). The effectiveness of drama as an instructional approach for the development of second language oral fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness. TESOL Quarterly.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. B. (2012). Clear speech: Pronunciation and listening comprehension in North American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagen, U. (1991). Challenge for the actor. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hardison, D. M., & Sonchaeng, C. (2005). Theatre voice training and technology in teaching oral skills: Integrating the components of a speech event. System, 331, 593–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G. (2007). Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: Perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1221, 2842–2854. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knight, D. (1997). Standard speech: The ongoing debate. In M. E. Hampton & B. Acker (Eds.), The vocal vision: Views on voice (pp. 155–184) New York, NY: Hal Leonard Corporation.Google Scholar
(2012). Speaking with skill: An introduction to Knight-Thompson speech work. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 331, 159–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leigh, S. A. (2016). Testing an approach to teaching Italian lyric diction to opera singers: An action research study (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
Levis, J. M., & Barriuso, T. A., (2012). Nonnative speakers’ pronunciation errors in spoken and read English. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 187–194). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
McGuinness, D., & Pribram, K. H. (1979). The origins of sensory bias in the development of gender differences in perception and cognition. In M. Bortner (Ed.), Cognitive growth and development: Essays in memory of Herbert G. Birch (pp. 3–56). New York, NY: Brummer/Mazel.Google Scholar
Méli, A. (2013). Phonological acquisition in the French-English interlanguage. In A. Díaz-Negrillo, N. Ballier, & P. Thompson (Eds.), Automatic treatment and analysis of learner corpus data (pp. 207–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J. (2003). A primer on accent discrimination in the Canadian context. TESL Canada Journal, 201, 38–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2006). The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 341, 520–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polatajko, H. J., Kaplan, B. J., & Wilson, B. N. (1992). Sensory integration treatment for children with learning disabilities: Its status 20 years later. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 121, 323–341.Google Scholar
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 621, 595–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2017). Using listener judgements to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 381, 439–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Webb, S. (2017). Re-examining phonological and lexical correlates of second language comprehensibility: The role of rater experience. In T. Isaacs & P. Trofimovich (Eds.), Second language pronunciation assessment: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 141–156). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schiffman, J. (2004). Spotlight on speech/voiceover/dialects: The rain in Maine. Backstage. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Skinner, E. (1942/2000). Speak with distinction: The classic Skinner method to speech on the stage. New York, NY: Hal Leonard Corporation.Google Scholar
Spolin, V. (1986). Theater games for the classroom: A teacher’s handbook. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Stanislavski, C. (1936). An actor prepares. New York, NY: Rutledge/Theatre Arts Books.Google Scholar
Stern, S. L. (1980). Drama in second language learning from a psycholinguistic perspective. Language Learning, 301, 77–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. G. (1989). A “dramatic” approach to improving the intelligibility of ITAs. English for Specific Purposes, 81, 181–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thirsk, J., & Solak, H. G. (2012). Vocal clarity through drama strategy. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 461, 343–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tokumoto, M., & Shibata, M. (2011). Asian varieties of English: Attitudes towards pronunciation. World Englishes, 301, 392–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2012). Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 151, 905–916. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wennerstrom, A. (1992). Content-based pronunciation. TESOL Journal, 11, 15–18.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Mister, Bianca, Amanda Baker & Honglin Chen
2021. Punching through the barrier. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 7:2 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John
2020. Revisiting the Intelligibility and Nativeness Principles. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 6:3 ► pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Zielinski, Beth & Elizabeth Pryor
2020. Comprehensibility andeveryday English use. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 6:3 ► pp. 352 ff. DOI logo
Zielinski, Beth & Elizabeth Pryor
2022. Comprehensibility and everyday English use. In The Evolution of Pronunciation Teaching and Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 121], ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2018. Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2019. Teaching-oriented research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2022. Revisiting the Intelligibility and Nativeness Principles. In The Evolution of Pronunciation Teaching and Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 121], ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.