Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 1:1 (2015) ► pp.65–85

Quasi-neutralization in the acquisition of English coronal fricatives by native speakers of Japanese

| University of Aizu and University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Second language learners show various forms of mispronunciation, or modification, of target pronunciation, most perhaps due to direct native language transfer, but others, summarized here, to deflected contrast, hypercorrection and covert contrast. The present paper reports on a novel form of adaptation that we term ‘quasi-neutralization,’ in which acoustic characteristics of competing target phonemes are found within the same interlanguage segment (e.g., think [θɪŋk] pronounced as [θsiŋk]). The three English voiceless coronal fricatives /s/, /ʃ/, /θ/ were elicited from Japanese learners of English via two techniques: a wordlist reading task that encouraged participants to focus on their pronunciation, and a sentence construction task that diverted their attention from pronunciation. Among different types of modification, quasi-neutralization was observed predominantly when participants were conscious of their pronunciation, which could reflect their linguistic insecurity as learners. This research thus illuminates another of the strategies that learners employ in the acquisition of L2 pronunciation.

Keywords: hypercorrection, English fricatives, L2 pronunciation, quasineutralization, L1 interference
Published online: 30 March 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.1.1.03kan
References
Berti, L.C
(2010) Contrast and covert contrast in the speech production of children. Pro-fono Revista de Atualizacao Cientifica, 221, 531–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, J.B
(2007) Incomplete neutralization in Eastern Andalusian Spanish: Perceptual consequences of durational differences involved in s-aspiration. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences , 161, 1765–1768.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D
(2014) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.77, retrieved 18 May 2014 from [URL]
Brockhaus, W
(1995) Final devoicing in the phonology of German Linguistische Arbeiten, Vol. 3361. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles-Luce, J
(1985) Word-final devoicing in German: effects of phonetic and sentential contexts. Journal of Phonetics, 131, 309–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles-Luce, J., & Dinnseu, D.A
(1987) A reanalysis of Catalan devoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 151, 187–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinnsen, D.A
(1985) A re-examination of phonological neutralization. Journal of Linguistics, 21(2), 265–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinnsen, D.A., & Charles-Luce, J
(1984) Phonological neutralization, phonetic implementation and individual differences. Journal of Phonetics, 12(1), 49–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dmitrieva, O., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J
(2010) Phonological neutralization by native and non-native speakers: The case of Russian final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 483–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F.R., Elreyes, A., & Iverson, G.K
(2003) Some principles of second language phonology. Second Language Research, 19(3), 169–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F.R., & Iverson, G.K
(2013) The role of the native language in the acquisition of L2 phonemic contrasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 351, 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F.R., Iverson, G.K., & Song, J.Y
(2013) The role of hypercorrection in the acquisition of L2 phonemic contrasts. Second Language Research, 29(3), 257–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Covert contrast in the acquisition of second language phonology. In A.W. Farris-Trimble & J.A. Barlow (Eds.), Papers on Phonology and Acquisition in Honor of Daniel A. Dinnsen (pp. 25–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R.H
(2006) The functionality of incomplete neutralization in Dutch: The case of past-tense formation. In L.M. Goldstein, D.H. Whalen, & C.T. Best (Eds.), Laboratory phonology VIII (pp. 27–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2007) Intraparadigmatic effects on the perception of voice. In J.v.d. Weijer & E.J. v. d. Torre (Eds.), Voicing in Dutch: (De)voicing - Phonology, phonetics, and psycholinguistics (pp. 153–173). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J.E
(1995) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Interactions between the native and second language phonetic systems. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 217–244). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
(2003) Methods for assessing the perception of vowels in a second language. In E. Fava & A. Mioni (Eds.), Issues in clinical linguistics (pp. 19–44). Padova: UniPress.Google Scholar
Fourakis, M., & Iverson, G.K
(1984) On the ‘incomplete neutralization’of German final obstruents. Phonetica, 41(3), 140–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gick, B., & Wilson, I
(2006) Excrescent schwa and vowel laxing: Cross-linguistic responses to conflicting articulatory targets. In L. Goldstein, D.H. Whalen, & C.T. Best (Eds.), Laboratory phonology VIII (pp. 635–659). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heo, Y
(2010) Vowel insertion as perceptual intrusion in loanword adaptation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee.
Idsardi, W.J., & Son, S.A
(2004) What do Korean speakers learn about English fricatives. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 101, 48–59.Google Scholar
Iverson, G.K
(1997) Review of Brockhaus (1995). American Journal of Germanic Languages and Literatures, 91, 255–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, G.K., & Salmons, J.C
(1995) Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic. Phonology, 121, 369–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Domains and directionality in the evolution of German final fortition. Phonology, 24(1), 121–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Final devoicing and laryngeal neutralization. In M. van Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume, & K.R. Malden (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology (Vol. 51, pp. 1622–1643). MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jassem, W., & Richter, L
(1989) Neutralization of voicing in Polish obstruents. Journal of Phonetics, 17(4), 317–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaneko, E., & Iverson, G.K
(2009) Phonetic and other factors in Japanese on-line adaptation of English final consonants. Studies in Language Sciences, 81, 179–195.Google Scholar
Keating, P.A
(1984) Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language, 60(2), 286–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, H., & Jongman, A
(1996) Acoustic and perceptual evidence for complete neutralization of manner of articulation in Korean. Journal of Phonetics, 24(3), 295–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P
forthcoming). Phonologization. In P. Honeybone & J.C. Salmons (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of historical phonology Oxford Oxford University Press DOI logo
Kleber, F., John, T., & Harrington, J
(2010) The implications for speech perception of incomplete neutralization of final devoicing in German. Journal of Phonetics, 38(2), 185–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohler, K.J
(1984) Phonetic explanation in phonology: The feature fortis/lenis. Phonetica, 41(3), 150–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Beyond laboratory phonology. In M.-J. Solé, P.S. Beddor, & M. Ohala (Eds.), Experimental approaches to phonology (pp. 41–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P.K., & Iverson, P
(1995) Linguistic experience and the ‘Perceptual Magnet Effect.’ In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp.121–153). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W
(1994) Principles of linguistic change, Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Yaeger, M., & Steiner, R
(1972) A quantitative study of sound change in progress, Volumes I & II1. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania: National Science Foundation Contract NSF-GS-3287.Google Scholar
Li, F., Edwards, J., & Beckman, M.E
(2009) Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers. Journal of Phonetics, 27(1), 111–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, F., Munson, B., Edwards, J., Yoneyama, K., & Hall, K
(2011) Language specificity in the perception of voiceless sibilant fricatives in Japanese and English: Implications for cross-language differences in speech-sound development. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1291, 999–1011. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macken, M.A., & Barton, D
(1980) A longitudinal study of the acquisition of the voicing contrast in American-English word-initial stops, as measured by voice onset time. Journal of Child Language, 71, 41–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manaster Ramer
A (1996) A letter from an incompletely neutral phonologist. Journal of Phonetics, 24(4), 477–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Dell, M., & Port, R
(1983) Discrimination of word-final voicing in German. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73(S1), 31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, D.B., Lively, S.E., & Logan, J.S
(1994) Perceptual learning of nonnative speech contrasts: implications for theories of speech perception. In J.C. Goodman & H.C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 121–166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Port, R.F
(1996) The discreteness of phonetic elements and formal linguistics: response to A. Manaster Ramer. Journal of Phonetics, 24(4), 491–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Port, R.F., & Crawford, P
(1989) Incomplete neutralization and pragmatics in German. Journal of Phonetics, 17(4), 257–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Port, R.F., & Leary, A.P
(2005) Against formal phonology. Language, 811, 927–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Port, R.F., & O’Dell, M.L
(1985) Neutralization of syllable-final voicing in German. Journal of Phonetics, 131, 455–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pye, S
(1986) Word-final devoicing of obstruents in Russian. Cambridge Papers in Phonetics and Experimental Linguistics, 51, 1–10.Google Scholar
Röttger, T., Winter, B., & Grawunder, S
(2011) The robustness of incomplete neutralization in German. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1722–1725). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
Scobbie, J.M
(1998) Interactions between the acquisition of phonetics and phonology. In M.C. Gruber, D. Higgins, K. Olson, & T. Wysocki (Eds.), Papers from the 34th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (Vol. 21, pp. 343–358). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Scobbie, J.M., Gibbon, F., Hardcastle, W.J., & Fletcher, P
(2000) Covert contrast as a stage in the acquisition of phonetics and phonology. In M. Broe & J. Pierrehumbert (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon (Vol. 51, pp. 194–203). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M
(1990) The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slowiaczek, L.M., & Dinnsen, D.A
(1985) On the neutralizing status of Polish word final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 13(3), 325–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toda, M., & Honda, K
(2003) An MRI-based cross-linguistic study of sibilant fricatives. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Speech Production (pp. 1–6). Sydney.
van Oostendorp, M
(2008) Incomplete devoicing in formal phonology. Lingua, 118(9), 1362–1374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vance, T.J
(1987) An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Vance, T
(2008) The sounds of Japanese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, N., Jongman, A., Sereno, J., & Kemps, R
(2004) Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: Evidence from Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 251–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, B., & Röttger, T
(2011) The nature of incomplete neutralization in German: Implications for laboratory phonology. Grazer Linguistische Studien, 761, 55–74.Google Scholar
Xu, Y
(2010) In defense of lab speech. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 329–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, A.C.L
(2007) Understanding near mergers: The case of morphological tone in Cantonese. Phonology, 24(1), 187–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Huang, Becky & Keelan Evanini
2016. Think, sink, and beyond. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 2:2 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2018. Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2018. Precision and imprecision in second language pronunciation. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 4:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2018. Technology and second language pronunciation. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 4:2 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Solon, Megan
2018. Chapter 4. Novel sounds. In Critical Reflections on Data in Second Language Acquisition [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 51], ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.