Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 5:1 (2019) ► pp.13–48

Learning Korean pronunciation

Effects of instruction, proficiency, and L1

 | Michigan State University
This study investigated the effects of pronunciation instruction for 36 tertiary learners of Korean in terms of accentedness, comprehensibility, and phonological error rates while accounting for proficiency (2nd-semester beginners, 4th-semester intermediates), first language background (English, Chinese), and task effects. Participants completed beginner-appropriate picture description and read-aloud tasks at pretest and posttest. Over eight weeks, a treatment group received eight hours of instruction targeting segmental and syllable-structure features. Ten Korean NSs judged learner accentedness and comprehensibility, and learner productions were analyzed for phonological errors. Beginners’ accentedness, comprehensibility, and error rates improved regardless of receiving instruction. For intermediates, the control group showed no development in comprehensibility or accentedness, while the treatment group trended toward increased comprehensibility. Intermediate students showed minimal improvements in phonological error rates. L1 had a negligible impact on accentedness and comprehensibility, but Chinese-speaking students committed more syllable-structure errors. Associations between phonological errors and comprehensibility/accentedness varied by outcome task and L1.
Keywords: accentedness, comprehensibility, cross-linguistic influence, Korean, phonological errors, pronunciation instruction
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Perspectives on L2 pronunciation
      • 1.1.1Phonological production
      • 1.1.2Global listener perceptions
    • 1.2Factors affecting L2 pronunciation learning: Proficiency, L1, and outcome task
      • 1.2.1Proficiency
      • 1.2.2L1
      • 1.2.3Outcome task
    • 1.3The present study
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Description of pronunciation instruction
    • 2.3Instruments
      • 2.3.1Outcome tasks
    • 2.4Procedures
    • 2.5Analyses
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1RQ1: Pronunciation development
    • 3.2RQ2: Factors influencing pronunciation development
      • Comprehensibility
      • Accentedness
      • Phonological productions
    • 3.3RQ3: Relationships among pronunciation measures
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Limitations
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 March 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.17010.isb
References (57)
References
Bassetti, B., & Atkinson, N. (2015). Effects of orthographic forms on pronunciation in experienced instructed second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 361, 67–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P. (2006). Perceptual paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual differences. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 441, 231–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.04, retrieved 1 November 2015 from [URL]
Couper, G. (2006). The short and long-term effects of pronunciation instruction. Prospect, 21(1), 46–66.Google Scholar
Crowther, D., Isaacs, T., Trofimovich, P., & Saito, K. (2015). Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T. (2015). Second language comprehensibility revisited: Investigating the effects of learner background. TESOL Quarterly, 491, 814–837. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the New Statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2009). Comprehensibility as a factor in listener interaction preferences: Implications for the workplace. Canadian Modern Language Review, 21, 181–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 359–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Weibe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1988). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(1), 70–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Hardison, D. M. (2004). Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 34–52.Google Scholar
Jung, M.-S. (2003). Ilponinkwa Cwungkwukinuy Hankwuke ekyang [The intonation of Japanese and Chinese Korean-learners]. Hankwuke Kyoywuk, 14(1), 233–247.Google Scholar
Kang, O. (2012). Impact of rater characteristics and prosodic features of speaker accentedness on ratings of international teaching assistants’ oral performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(3), 249–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Pickering, L. (2010). Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 554–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, S., Blanchet, J., & Trofimovich, P. (2014). Learner pronunciation, awareness, and instruction in French as a second language. Foreign Language Annals, 47(1), 79–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. (2010). L2 Korean phonology. Berlin: VDM.Google Scholar
Kim, M. (2007). Aspects of Korean second language phonology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
Kissling, E. M. (2013). Teaching pronunciation : Is explicit phonetics instruction beneficial for FL learners ? Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 720–744. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). What predicts the effectiveness of foreign-language pronunciation instruction ? Investigating the role of perception and other individual differences. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(4), 532–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 345–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. (2012). Orthographic influence on the phonological development of L2 learners of Korean (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
Lee, S.-Y., Moon, J., & Long, M. H. (2009). Linguistic correlates of proficiency in Korean as a second language. Language Research, 45(2), 319–348.Google Scholar
Levis, J. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J., Sonsaat, S., Link, S., Barriuso, T. A. (2016). Native and nonnative teachers of L2 pronunciation: Effects on learner performance. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 894–931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., & Cunnings, I. (2015). The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 651(Suppl. 1), 185–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lord, G. (2008). Podcasting communities and second language pronunciation. Foreign Language Annals, 41(2), 374–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 341, 520–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). A prospectus for pronunciation research in the 21st century: A point of view. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1(1), 11–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Morton, S. L. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 111–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2012). Influence.ME: Tools for detecting influenctial data in mixed effects models. R Journal, 4(2), 38–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, M. G. (2014). L2 learners’ assessments of accentedness, fluency, and comprehensibility of native and nonnative German speech. Language Learning, 64(4), 715–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oh, J. S., Jun, S.-A., Knightly, L. M., & Au, T. K. M. (2003). Holding on to childhood language memory. Cognition, 861, B53–B64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okuno, T., & Hardison, D. M. (2016). Perception-production link in L2 Japanese vowel duration: Training with technology. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 61–80.Google Scholar
Olson, D. (2014a). Benefits of visual feedback on segmental production in the L2 classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 173–192.Google Scholar
(2014b). Phonetics and technology in the classroom: A practical approach to using speech analysis software in L2 pronunciation instruction. Hispania, 97(1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 291, 191–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Saito, K. (2013). Reexamining effects of form-focused instruction on L2 pronunciation development: The role of explicit phonetic information. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 351, 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Communicative focus on second language phonetic form: Teaching Japanese learners to perceive and produce English /ɹ/ without explicit instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 361, 377–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /r/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 371, 217–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Webb, S., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Lexical correlates of comprehensibility versus accentedness in second language speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 597–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shin, J., Kiaer, J., & Cha, J. (2013). The sounds of Korean. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Southwood, M. H., & Flege, J. E. (1999). Scaling foreign accent: Direct magnitude estimation versus interval scaling. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 131, 335–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. (1994). Assessment of L2 proficiency in second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 441, 307–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction : A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2012). Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 905–916. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Myford, C. (2013). Raters’ L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance. Language Testing, 30(2), 231–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Isbell, Daniel R., Junkyu Lee & Juhyun Jang
2024. Linguistic influences on comprehensibility and accentedness in second language Korean speech. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:4 ► pp. 1575 ff. DOI logo
Crowther, Dustin & Daniel R. Isbell
2023. Second language speech comprehensibility: A research agenda. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Crowther, Dustin, Daniel R. Isbell & Hitoshi Nishizawa
2023. Second language speech comprehensibility and acceptability in academic settings: Listener perceptions and speech stream influences. Applied Psycholinguistics 44:5 ► pp. 858 ff. DOI logo
Huensch, Amanda & Charlie Nagle
2023. Revisiting the moderating effect of speaker proficiency on the relationships among intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:2 ► pp. 571 ff. DOI logo
Isbell, Daniel R. & Mari Sakai
2022. Pronunciation Assessment in Classroom Contexts. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Uchihara, Takumi
2022. Is it possible to measure word-level comprehensibility and accentedness as independent constructs of pronunciation knowledge?. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1:2 ► pp. 100011 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John
2021. L2 pronunciation research and teaching. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 7:2 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Crowther, Dustin
2020. Rating L2 speaker comprehensibility on monologic vs. interactive tasks. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 6:1 ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Crowther, Dustin & Susan M. Gass
2019. Speaking. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning, ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2019. Teaching-oriented research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.