Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 4:2 (2018) ► pp.208–231

High Variability [Pronunciation] Training (HVPT)

A proven technique about which every language teacher and learner ought to know

| Brock University
This article is a critical research synthesis of 32 studies that used the High Variability Phonetic Training (HVPT) technique to teach learners to better perceive and produce L2 sounds. Taken together, the studies surveyed provide compelling evidence that HVPT is a very effective pronunciation training tool, and that resulting improvement is long-lasting. The analysis of this research also helps to explain why very few teachers have heard of this empirically-driven approach to pronunciation instruction: HVPT studies are largely published in technically oriented journals; few are accessible to language teachers. A variety of obstacles to the widespread use of HVPT are discussed, and some possible solutions are provided.
Keywords: L2 pronunciation, foreign accent, intelligibility, High Variability Phonetic Training (HVPT), computer assisted pronunciation training
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Origins of HVPT
  • 3.Details of studies surveyed
    • 3.1Learner ages and language experience
    • 3.2Learner L1s and target L2 sounds
    • 3.3Experimental groups and sample sizes
    • 3.4Number of stimulus talkers and phonetic contexts
    • 3.5Duration of training
    • 3.6Delayed post-tests
    • 3.7Testing of production
  • 4.Overview of findings
    • 4.1Impact of individual and group differences
    • 4.2Generalizability
      • 4.2.1To new talkers
      • 4.2.2To the same sound targets in new words
      • 4.2.3To larger stretches of discourse
      • 4.2.4To untrained sound categories
      • 4.2.5To pronunciation
    • 4.3Retention
    • 4.4HVPT versus LVPT
    • 4.5HVPT versus other techniques
    • 4.6Limits on variability and its effectiveness
    • 4.7Modifications to canonical HVPT
  • 5.Critique of methods and gaps in findings
    • 5.1Individual differences
    • 5.2Learners’ L1s and target L2 sounds
    • 5.3Experimental groups and sample sizes
    • 5.4Number of stimulus talkers and phonetic contexts
    • 5.5Presentation of stimuli
    • 5.6Modifications to canonical HVPT
    • 5.7Duration of training
    • 5.8Delayed post-tests
    • 5.9Testing of production
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 1 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.17038.tho
References (51)
References
Avery, P., & Ehrlich, S. (1992). Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y. I. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. I. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299–2310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlet, A. (2017). L2 perception and production of English consonants and vowels by Catalan speakers: The effects of attention and training task in a cross-training study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Cebrian, J., & Carlet, A. (2014). Second-language learners’ identification of target-language phonemes: A short-term phonetic training study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(4), 474–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). A critical period for learning to pronounce foreign languages? Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 162–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. (1995a). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995b). Two procedures for training a novel second language phonetic contrast. Applied Psycholinguistics, 161, 425–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125–3134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(5), 2711–2724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hazan, V., Sennema, A., Iba, M., & Faulkner, A. (2005). Effect of audiovisual perceptual training on the perception and production of consonants by Japanese learners of English. Speech Communication, 47(3), 360–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirata, Y. (2004). Training native English speakers to perceive Japanese length contrasts in word versus sentence contexts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4), 2384–2394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hwang, H., & Lee, H. Y. (2015). The effect of high variability phonetic training on the production of English vowels and consonants. In the Scottish Consortium for ICPhS (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Paper number 466. Glasgow, UK: Glasgow University.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., & Evans, G. B. (2009). Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 126(8), 866–877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English/r/-/l/to Japanese adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(5), 3267–3278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, P., Pinet, M., & Evans, B. G. (2012). Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(1), 145–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambacher, S. G., Martens, W. L., Kakehi, K., Marasinghe, C. A., & Molholt, G. (2005). The effects of identification training on the identification and production of American English vowels by native speakers of Japanese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(2), 227–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lengeris, A., & Hazan, V. (2010). The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6), 3757–3768. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, M. (2008, July 6). HVPT. [Blog post]. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Lim, S. J., & Holt, L. L. (2011). Learning foreign sounds in an alien world: Videogame training improves non-native speech categorization. Cognitive Science, 35(7), 1390–1405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(3), 1242–1255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y. I., & Yamada, T. (1994). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and/l/ III: Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(4), 2076–2087. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and/l/: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874–886. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Major, R. C. (1987). Foreign accent: Recent research and theory. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 25(4), 185–202.Google Scholar
Nishi, K., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: Influence of training sets. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(6), 1496–1509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Nonnative speech perception training using vowel subsets: Effects of vowels in sets and order of training. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(6), 1480–1493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrachione, T. K., Lee, J., Ha, L. Y., & Wong, P. C. (2011). Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1), 461–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, J. S., Jenkins, J. J., & Strange, W. (2006). Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1684–1696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qian, M., Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., & Levis, J. (2018). A system for adaptive high-variability segmental perceptual training: Implementation, effectiveness, transfer. Language Learning and Technology, 22(1), 69–96.Google Scholar
Rato, A., Rauber, A. S., Kluge, D. C., & dos Santos, G. R. (2015). Designing speech perception tasks with TP. Investigating English pronunciation: Trends and directions. In J. A. Mompean & J. Fouz-González, (Eds.), Investigating English pronunciation: Trends and directions. (pp. 295–313). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rato, A., & Rauber, A. (2015). The effects of perceptual training on the production of English vowel contrasts by Portuguese learners. In the Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Paper number 656. Glasgow, UK: Glasgow University.Google Scholar
Shin, D. J., & Iverson, P. (2013). Training Korean second language speakers on English vowels and prosody. In Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA 2013, 19(1). Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajima, K., Kato, H., Rothwell, A., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Munhall, K. G. (2008). Training English listeners to perceive phonemic length contrasts in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(1), 397–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R. I. (2007). Modeling L1/L2 interactions in the perception and production of English vowels by Mandarin L1 speakers: A training study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta.Google Scholar
(2011). Computer assisted pronunciation training: Targeting second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 281, 744–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012a). Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A computer-mediated approach. Language Learning, 621, 1231–1258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b). English Accent Coach: Not quite a fairy godmother for pronunciation instruction, but a step in the right direction. CONTACT, 38(1), 18–24.Google Scholar
(2013). ESL teachers’ beliefs and practices in pronunciation teaching: Confidently right or confidently wrong? In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Aug. 2012. (pp. 224–233). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
(2014). Myth 6: Accent reduction and pronunciation instruction are the same thing. In L. Grant (Ed.). Pronunciation myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. (pp.160–187). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(2016a). Does training to perceive L2 English vowels in one phonetic context transfer to other phonetic contexts? Canadian Acoustics, 44(3), 198–199.Google Scholar
(2016b). Learning to perceive English sounds using computer-assisted pronunciation training. AL Forum, November, 2016. Alexandria, VA: TESOL International Association.Google Scholar
(2018). English Accent Coach [Computer program]. Version 2.3. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Is phonemic training using nonsense or real words more effective? In J. Levis, H. Le, I. Lucic, E. Simpson, & S. Vo (Eds.). Proceedings of the 7th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Oct. 2015. (pp. 88–97). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Wang, X., & Munro, M. J. (2004). Computer-based training for learning English vowel contrasts. System, 32(4), 539–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(6), 3649–3658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, J. W. S. (2014). The effects of high and low variability phonetic training on the perception and production of English vowels/e/-/æ/by Cantonese ESL learners with high and low L2 proficiency levels. In the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Singapore, 14–18 September.Google Scholar
Ylinen, S., Uther, M., Latvala, A., Vepsäläinen, S., Iverson, P., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Näätänen, R. (2010). Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: A study of Finnish second-language users of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1319–1332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (76)

Cited by 76 other publications

Almusharraf, Asma, Amal Aljasser, Hassan Saleh Mahdi, Haifa Al-Nofaie & Elham Ghobain
2024. Exploring the effects of modality and variability on EFL learners’ pronunciation of English diphthongs: a student perspective on HVPT implementation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
Jones, Johnathan
2024. Exploring open consonantal environments for at-home testing of vowel perception in advanced L2 speakers. Applied Linguistics Review 15:3 ► pp. 771 ff. DOI logo
Kocjančič, Tanja, Tomáš Bořil & Susanna Hofmann
2024. Acoustic and Articulatory Visual Feedback in Classroom L2 Vowel Remediation. Language and Speech DOI logo
Levis, John
2024. The effectiveness of pronunciation instruction. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation DOI logo
Llanes, Àngels & Elsa Tragant
2024. Measuring the effects of repeated exposure to children’s graded readers. Language Teaching Research 28:5 ► pp. 1842 ff. DOI logo
Maczuga, Paulina, Johannes Knaus & Mary Grantham O’Brien
2024. A principled approach to teaching German lexical stress assignment. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 10:1 ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Mahdi, Hassan Saleh, Reem Alkhammash & Anwar A. H. Al-Athwary
2024. Using high variability phonetic training as a contextualized tool in the development of English consonant clusters pronunciation among Saudi EFL learners. Education and Information Technologies 29:6 ► pp. 6821 ff. DOI logo
Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim
2024. EFL Learners' Perspectives on Online Pronunciation Instruction. In Teacher and Student Perspectives on Bilingual and Multilingual Education [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim & Hung Phu Bui
2024. EFL Learners’ Perceptions of Pronunciation Corrective Feedback: Insights from Synchronous High Variability Phonetic Training. In Innovations in Technologies for Language Teaching and Learning [Studies in Computational Intelligence, 1159], ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Mora, Joan C. & Jonás Fouz-González
2024. Contrastive input enhancement in captioned video for L2 pronunciation learning. In Audiovisual Input and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 61], ► pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
dela Cruz, John Wayne N.
2023. Plurilingual Strategies for Teaching Pronunciation in TESOL: A Research-Based and Action-Oriented Approach. In Handbook of Multilingual TESOL in Practice, ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
EXARE, Christelle & Jacqueline VAISSIÈRE
2023. Comment favoriser l’apprentissage des sons de l’anglais par de jeunes locuteurs non natifs ?. Espaces Linguistiques :5 DOI logo
Lee, KyungA
2023. An analysis of English as a foreign language learners’ perceptual confusions and phonemic awareness of English fricatives. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 15:3 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Di, Tamara Jones & Marnie Reed
2023. Phonetics in Language Teaching, DOI logo
Mora, Joan C. & Ingrid Mora-Plaza
2023. From Research in the Lab to Pedagogical Practices in the EFL Classroom: The Case of Task-Based Pronunciation Teaching. Education Sciences 13:10 ► pp. 1042 ff. DOI logo
Nagle, Charlie
2023. Reconceptualizing the (book) review. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 9:1 ► pp. 130 ff. DOI logo
Nagle, Charlie & Phil Hiver
2023. Optimizing second language pronunciation instruction: Replications of Martin and Sippel (2021), Olson and Offerman (2021), and Thomson (2012). Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Naito, Yuka
2023. Does Musical Training Influence Perceptual Learning of Japanese Pitch Accent? The Case of Native Italian Speakers. In Advances in Second/Foreign Language Acquisition, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Saito, Kazuya, Takumi Uchihara, Kotaro Takizawa & Yui Suzukida
2023. Individual differences in L2 listening proficiency revisited: Roles of form, meaning, and use aspects of phonological vocabulary knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sweeting, Arizio M. & Michael D. Carey
2023. What pronunciation specialists believe CELTA tutors need to know to prepare student teachers to teach pronunciation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
Black-Rotchin, Sivan & Walcir Cardoso
2022. The development of the FineTune app. In Intelligent CALL, granular systems and learner data: short papers from EUROCALL 2022, ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Brekelmans, Gwen, Nadine Lavan, Haruka Saito, Meghan Clayards & Elizabeth Wonnacott
2022. Does high variability training improve the learning of non-native phoneme contrasts over low variability training? A replication. Journal of Memory and Language 126 ► pp. 104352 ff. DOI logo
Carlet, Angélica & Juli Cebrian
2022. The roles of task, segment type, and attention in L2 perceptual training. Applied Psycholinguistics 43:2 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Chun, Dorothy M. & Yan Jiang
2022. Using Technology to Explore L2 Pronunciation. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Chung, Rhonda & Walcir Cardoso
2022. Ecological CALL: development of a self-location tool for attuning to the ‘chorus of voices’. In Intelligent CALL, granular systems and learner data: short papers from EUROCALL 2022, ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Demir, Yusuf & Galip Kartal
2022. MAPPING RESEARCH ON L2 PRONUNCIATION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44:5 ► pp. 1211 ff. DOI logo
Derwing, Tracey M., John M. Levis & Sinem Sonsaat‐Hegelheimer
2022. Bridging the Research‐Practice Gap in L2 Pronunciation. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Martin, Ines A. & Solène Inceoglu
2022. The Laboratory, the Classroom, and Online. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 254 ff. DOI logo
Mora, Joan C., Mireia Ortega, Ingrid Mora-Plaza & Cristina Aliaga-García
2022. Training the pronunciation of L2 vowels under different conditions: the use of non-lexical materials and masking noise. Phonetica 79:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
O'Brien, Mary Grantham
2022. Making the Teaching of Suprasegmentals Accessible. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Saito, Kazuya, Keiko Hanzawa, Katya Petrova, Magdalena Kachlicka, Yui Suzukida & Adam Tierney
2022. Incidental and Multimodal High Variability Phonetic Training: Potential, Limits, and Future Directions. Language Learning 72:4 ► pp. 1049 ff. DOI logo
Schwab, Sandra & Volker Dellwo
2022. Explicit versus non-explicit prosodic training in the learning of Spanish L2 stress contrasts by French listeners. Journal of Second Language Studies 5:2 ► pp. 266 ff. DOI logo
Sonsaat‐Hegelheimer, Sinem & Shannon McCrocklin
2022. Research‐informed Materials for Pronunciation Teaching. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Trouvain, Jürgen
2022. Das IFCASL-Korpus als phonetisches Lernerkorpus. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 50:1 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Uchihara, Takumi, Stuart Webb, Kazuya Saito & Pavel Trofimovich
2022. THE EFFECTS OF TALKER VARIABILITY AND FREQUENCY OF EXPOSURE ON THE ACQUISITION OF SPOKEN WORD KNOWLEDGE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44:2 ► pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Wojtkowiak, Ewelina
2022. The Effects of Intensive Phonetic Training on the Acquisition of English Stops. In Theoretical and Practical Developments in English Speech Assessment, Research, and Training [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Bu, Lindsay, Marisa Nagano, Daphna Harel & Tara McAllister
2021. Effects of Practice Variability on Second-Language Speech Production Training. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 73:5 ► pp. 384 ff. DOI logo
Couper, Graeme
2021. Pronunciation Teaching Issues: Answering Teachers’ Questions. RELC Journal 52:1 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Couper, Graeme
2022. Effective Feedback for Pronunciation Teaching. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Fouz-González, Jonás & Jose A Mompean
2021. Phonetic symbols vs keywords in perceptual training: the learners’ views. ELT Journal 75:4 ► pp. 460 ff. DOI logo
Fouz-González, Jonás & Jose A. Mompean
2021. EXPLORING THE POTENTIAL OF PHONETIC SYMBOLS AND KEYWORDS AS LABELS FOR PERCEPTUAL TRAINING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:2 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Georgiou, Georgios P.
2021. Effects of Phonetic Training on the Discrimination of Second Language Sounds by Learners with Naturalistic Access to the Second Language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 50:3 ► pp. 707 ff. DOI logo
Kirkova-Naskova, Anastazija, Alice Henderson & Jonás Fouz-González
2021. Chapter 1. Advancing towards research-informed pronunciation pedagogy. In English Pronunciation Instruction [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 19], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Munro, Murray J.
2021. On the Difficulty of Defining “Difficult” in Second-Language Vowel Acquisition. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
Ortega, Mireia, Ingrid Mora Plaza & Joan C. Mora
2021. Chapter 14. Differential effects of lexical and non-lexical high-variability phonetic training on the production of L2 vowels. In English Pronunciation Instruction [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 19], ► pp. 328 ff. DOI logo
O’Brien, Mary Grantham
2021. Ease and Difficulty in L2 Pronunciation Teaching: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Communication 5 DOI logo
Thomson, Ron I.
2021. Commentary: When the Easy Becomes Difficult: Factors Affecting the Acquisition of the English /iː/-/ɪ/ Contrast and On the Difficulty of Defining “Difficult” in Second-Language Vowel Acquisition. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
Thomson, Ron I.
2022. Perception in Pronunciation Training. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Xiaojuan, Bing Cheng & Yang Zhang
2021. The Role of Talker Variability in Nonnative Phonetic Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 64:12 ► pp. 4802 ff. DOI logo
Hodgetts, John
2020. Suprasegmental Instruction and Intelligibility. In Pronunciation Instruction in English for Academic Purposes [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Hodgetts, John
2020. Conclusion and Recommendations for Future Practice. In Pronunciation Instruction in English for Academic Purposes [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Hodgetts, John
2020. Results, Analysis, and Discussion. In Pronunciation Instruction in English for Academic Purposes [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Hodgetts, John
2020. Pronunciation Instruction: Background, Techniques and Relevant Studies. In Pronunciation Instruction in English for Academic Purposes [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Iino, Atsushi, Yukiko Yabuta & Brian Wistner
2020. Effects and users’ reactions to the use of CAPT and HVPT on Japanese EFL learners’ segmental perception and production. In CALL for widening participation: short papers from EUROCALL 2020, ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Meigh, Kimberly M. & Elisabeth Kee
2020. Dissimilar Phonemes Create a Contextual Interference Effect During a Nonword Repetition Task. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Silpachai, Alif
2020. The role of talker variability in the perceptual learning of Mandarin tones by American English listeners. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 6:2 ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Derwing, Tracey M. & Ronald I. Thomson
2019. Reflections on the Development of L2 Pronunciation Research in Canada. The Canadian Modern Language Review 75:4 ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Iino, Atsushi
2019. Effects of HVPT on perception and production of English fricatives by Japanese learners of English. In CALL and complexity – short papers from EUROCALL 2019, ► pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2018. Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Setting Priorities. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Author’s Preface. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. The Intelligibility-Based Classroom. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Index. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Segmentals and Intelligibility. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Teaching for Intelligibility. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Introduction. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Rhythm and Intelligibility. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Consonant Clusters and Intelligibility. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Intelligibility, Comprehensibility, and Spoken Language. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Intonation and Intelligibility. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Series Editors’ Preface. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Word Stress and Intelligibility. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. What Should and Should Not Be Taught. In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation, ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020.  L ist of Sources . In Applying Phonetics, ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. . Experimental and Clinical Transplantation 22:Suppl 1 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Virtual Reality, Artificial Intelligence, and Language Learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 19], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.