High Variability [Pronunciation] Training (HVPT)
A proven technique about which every language teacher and learner ought to know
Ron I. Thomson | Brock University
This article is a critical research synthesis of 32 studies that used the High Variability Phonetic Training (HVPT) technique to teach learners to better perceive and produce L2 sounds. Taken together, the studies surveyed provide compelling evidence that HVPT is a very effective pronunciation training tool, and that resulting improvement is long-lasting. The analysis of this research also helps to explain why very few teachers have heard of this empirically-driven approach to pronunciation instruction: HVPT studies are largely published in technically oriented journals; few are accessible to language teachers. A variety of obstacles to the widespread use of HVPT are discussed, and some possible solutions are provided.
Keywords: foreign accent, L2 pronunciation, intelligibility, High Variability Phonetic Training (HVPT), Computer assisted pronunciation training
Published online: 01 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.17038.tho
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.17038.tho
References
References
Avery, P., & Ehrlich, S.
(1992) Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y. I.
(1999) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985. 
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. I.
(1997) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299–2310.
Carlet, A.
(2017) L2 perception and production of English consonants and vowels by Catalan speakers: The effects of attention and training task in a cross-training study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Cebrian, J., & Carlet, A.
(2014) Second-language learners’ identification of target-language phonemes: A short-term phonetic training study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(4), 474–499.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
(2015) Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Flege, J. E.
(1987) A critical period for learning to pronounce foreign languages? Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 162–177.
Flege, J.
(1995a) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Flege, J. E.
(1995b) Two procedures for training a novel second language phonetic contrast. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 425–442.
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R.
[ p. 228 ]
(1995) Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125–3134.
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S., & Jang, S.
(1997) Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470.
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C.
(2000) An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(5), 2711–2724.
Hazan, V., Sennema, A., Iba, M., & Faulkner, A.
(2005) Effect of audiovisual perceptual training on the perception and production of consonants by Japanese learners of English. Speech Communication, 47(3), 360–378.
Hirata, Y.
(2004) Training native English speakers to perceive Japanese length contrasts in word versus sentence contexts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4), 2384–2394.
Hwang, H., & Lee, H. Y.
(2015) The effect of high variability phonetic training on the production of English vowels and consonants. In the Scottish Consortium for ICPhS (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Paper number 466. Glasgow, UK: Glasgow University.
Iverson, P., & Evans, G. B.
(2009) Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 126(8), 866–877.
Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K.
(2005) Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English/r/-/l/to Japanese adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(5), 3267–3278.
Iverson, P., Pinet, M., & Evans, B. G.
(2012) Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(1), 145–160.
Lambacher, S. G., Martens, W. L., Kakehi, K., Marasinghe, C. A., & Molholt, G.
(2005) The effects of identification training on the identification and production of American English vowels by native speakers of Japanese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(2), 227–247.
Lengeris, A., & Hazan, V.
(2010) The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6), 3757–3768.
Lenneberg, E. H.
(1967) The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59–67.
Liberman, M.
(2008, July 6). HVPT. [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=328
Lim, S. J., & Holt, L. L.
(2011) Learning foreign sounds in an alien world: Videogame training improves non-native speech categorization. Cognitive Science, 35(7), 1390–1405.
Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B.
(1993) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(3), 1242–1255.
Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y. I., & Yamada, T.
(1994) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and/l/ III: Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(4), 2076–2087.
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B.
(1991) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and/l/: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874–886.
Major, R. C.
[ p. 229 ]
(1987) Foreign accent: Recent research and theory. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 25(4), 185–202.
Nishi, K., & Kewley-Port, D.
(2007) Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: Influence of training sets. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(6), 1496–1509.
(2008) Nonnative speech perception training using vowel subsets: Effects of vowels in sets and order of training. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(6), 1480–1493.
Perrachione, T. K., Lee, J., Ha, L. Y., & Wong, P. C.
(2011) Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1), 461–472.
Pruitt, J. S., Jenkins, J. J., & Strange, W.
(2006) Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1684–1696.
Qian, M., Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., & Levis, J.
(2018) A system for adaptive high-variability segmental perceptual training: Implementation, effectiveness, transfer. Language Learning and Technology, 22(1), 69–96.
Rato, A., Rauber, A. S., Kluge, D. C., & dos Santos, G. R.
(2015) Designing speech perception tasks with TP. Investigating English pronunciation: Trends and directions. In J. A. Mompean & J. Fouz-González, (Eds.), Investigating English pronunciation: Trends and directions. (pp. 295–313). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rato, A., & Rauber, A.
(2015) The effects of perceptual training on the production of English vowel contrasts by Portuguese learners. In the Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Paper number 656. Glasgow, UK: Glasgow University.
Shin, D. J., & Iverson, P.
(2013) Training Korean second language speakers on English vowels and prosody. In Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA 2013, 19(1). Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America.
Tajima, K., Kato, H., Rothwell, A., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Munhall, K. G.
(2008) Training English listeners to perceive phonemic length contrasts in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(1), 397–413.
Thomson, R. I.
(2007) Modeling L1/L2 interactions in the perception and production of English vowels by Mandarin L1 speakers: A training study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta.
(2011) Computer assisted pronunciation training: Targeting second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 28, 744–765.
(2012a) Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A computer-mediated approach. Language Learning, 62, 1231–1258.
(2012b) English Accent Coach: Not quite a fairy godmother for pronunciation instruction, but a step in the right direction. CONTACT, 38(1), 18–24.
(2013) ESL teachers’ beliefs and practices in pronunciation teaching: Confidently right or confidently wrong? In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Aug. 2012 (pp. 224–233). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
(2014) Myth 6: Accent reduction and pronunciation instruction are the same thing. In L. Grant (Ed.). Pronunciation myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. (pp.160–187). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
(2016a) Does training to perceive L2 English vowels in one phonetic context transfer to other phonetic contexts? Canadian Acoustics, 44(3), 198–199.
(2016b) Learning to perceive English sounds using computer-assisted pronunciation training. AL Forum, November 2016 Alexandria, VA: TESOL International Association.
(2018) English Accent Coach [Computer program]. Version 2.3. Retrieved from www.englishaccentcoach.com
Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M.
(2015) The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344.
(2016) Is phonemic training using nonsense or real words more effective? In J. Levis, H. Le, I. Lucic, E. Simpson, & S. Vo (Eds.). Proceedings of the 7th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Oct. 2015 (pp. 88–97). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
Wang, X., & Munro, M. J.
(2004) Computer-based training for learning English vowel contrasts. System, 32(4), 539–552.
Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A.
(1999) Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(6), 3649–3658.
Wong, J. W. S.
(2014) The effects of high and low variability phonetic training on the perception and production of English vowels/e/-/æ/by Cantonese ESL learners with high and low L2 proficiency levels. In the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Singapore, 14–18 September.
Ylinen, S., Uther, M., Latvala, A., Vepsäläinen, S., Iverson, P., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Näätänen, R.
(2010) Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: A study of Finnish second-language users of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1319–1332.
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. ix ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. xi ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. 1 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. 11 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. 33 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. 61 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. 86 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. 100 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. 127 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. 150 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. 185 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. 217 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. 239 ff.
No author info given
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
► pp. 295 ff.
Derwing, Tracey M. & Ronald I. Thomson
2019. Reflections on the Development of L2 Pronunciation Research in Canada.
The Canadian Modern Language Review 75:4 ► pp. 329 ff.
Iino, Atsushi
2019.
In CALL and complexity – short papers from EUROCALL 2019,
► pp. 186 ff.
Levis, John M.
2018.
In Intelligibility, Oral Communication, and the Teaching of Pronunciation,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 january 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.