References

References

Baese-Berk, M.
(2018) Perceptual learning for native and non-native speech. In K. D. Federmeier & D. G. Watson (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Current topics in language (pp. 1–29). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergeron, A., & Trofimovich, P.
(2017) Linguistic dimensions of accentenedness and comprehensibility: Exploring task and listener effects in second language French. Foreign Language Annals, 50, 547–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berry, G. M., & Ernestus, M.
(2018) Phonetic alignment in English as a lingua franca: Coming together while splitting apart. Second Language Research, 34, 343–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, S. E., Kuhlen, A. K., & Charoy, J.
(2018) Discourse and dialogue. In S. L. Thompson-Schill (Ed.), The Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 145–209). Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F.
(2004) Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3647–3658. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T.
(2019) VocabProfilers [computer program]. https://​www​.lextutor​.ca​/vp
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K.
(2015b) Does speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? The Modern Language Journal, 99, 80–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Linguistic dimensions of L2 accentedness and comprehensibility vary across speaking tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 443–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T.
(2015a) Second language comprehensibility revisited: Investigating the effects of learner background. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 814–837. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
(2007) A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
(1997) Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dragojevic, M., Giles, H., Beck, A.-C., & Tatum, N. T.
(2017) The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes. Communication Monographs, 84, 385–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ETS
(2017) TOEFL iBT® and IELTS® academic module scores: Score comparison tool. http://​www​.ets​.org​/toefl​/institutions​/scores​/compare
Flege, J., & Fletcher, K.
(1992) Talker and listener effects on the perception of degree of foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 370–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Galindo Ochoa, J. A.
(2017) The effect of task repetition on Colombian EFL students’ accuracy and fluency (Unpublished master’s thesis). Concordia University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Garrod, S., Tosi, A., & Pickering, M. J.
(2018) Alignment during interaction. In. S.-A. Rueschemeyer & M. G. Gaskell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 575–593). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, W., & Brown, A.
(2009) Working with qualitative data. Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., & Ogay, T.
(2007) Communication Accommodation Theory. In B. B. Whaley & W. Santer (eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 293–309). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Graf, L. K. M., Mayer, S., & Landwehr, J. R.
(2018) Measuring processing fluency: One versus five items. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28, 393–411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kang, O.
(2012) Impact of rater characteristics and prosodic features of speaker accentedness on ratings of international teaching assistants’ oral performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9, 249–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F.
(2015) Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. Psychological Review, 122, 148–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F.
(2016) What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 31, 32–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsuura, H., Chiba, R., & Fujieda, M.
(1999) Intelligibility and comprehensibility of American and Irish Englishes in Japan. World Englishes, 18, 49–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J.
(2018) Dimensions of pronunciation. In O. Kang, R. I. Thomson, & J. M. Murphy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of contemporary English pronunciation (pp. 413–431). Routledge.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
(1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C., Trofimovich, P., & Bergeron, A.
(2019) Toward a dynamic view of second language comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 647–672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newman, E. J., Sanson, M., Miller, E. K., Quigley-McBride, A., Foster, J. L., Bernstein, D. M., & Garry, M.
(2014) People with easier to pronounce names promote truthiness of claims. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e88671. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, M. G.
(2014) L2 learners’ assessments of accentedness, fluency, and comprehensibility of native and nonnative German speech. Language Learning, 64, 715–748. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pakhomov, S. V., Kaiser, E. A., Boley, D. L., Marino, S. E., Knopman, D. S., & Birnbaum, A. K.
(2011) Effects of age and dementia on temporal cycles in spontaneous speech fluency. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 619–635. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://​www​.R​-project​.org
Reber, R., & Greifeneder, R.
(2017) Processing fluency in education: How metacognitive feelings shape learning, belief formation, and affect. Educational Psychologist, 52, 84–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2005) Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., & Shintani, N.
(2016) Do native speakers of North American and Singapore English differentially perceive comprehensibility in second language speech? TESOL Quarterly, 50, 421–446. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
(2017) Using listener judgements to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38, 439–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, C. A., & Jaeger, A. J.
(2015) If it’s hard to read, it changes how long you do it: Reading time as an explanation for perceptual fluency effects on judgment. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 206–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, C. A., & Khan, S.
(2016) Instructor accents in online education and their effect on learning and attitudes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 494–502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, B. E., Elliott, N. C., & Baese-Berk, M. M.
(2017) Comprehensibility and intelligibility of international student speech: Comparing perceptions of university EAP instructors and content faculty. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 26, 42–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B.
(2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Song, H., & Schwarz, N.
(2008) If it’s hard to read, it’s hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science, 19, 986–988. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
(2012) Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 905–916. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xie, X., Weatherholtz, K., Bainton, L., Rowe, E., Burchill, Z., Liu, L., & Jaeger, T. F.
(2018) Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented speech and its transfer to an unfamiliar talker. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143, 2013–2031. CrossrefGoogle Scholar