Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 7:2 (2021) ► pp.212–239

Teacher cognition of pronunciation teaching

The techniques teachers use and why

ORCID logo | Auckland University of Technology (AUT), New Zealand
Recent advances in our empirically-based understanding of the role of instruction in pronunciation learning have been accompanied by growing recognition of the need for more knowledge about teachers’ cognitions of pronunciation teaching. That is, we want to know what they do and why because it informs teacher educators and researchers and provides a useful forum for teacher reflective practice. This paper draws on semi-structured interviews (N = 19), classroom observations (N = 6) and follow-up discussions to report on the pronunciation techniques the participants say they use, what they were observed using, and their related knowledge and beliefs. The following thematic areas emerged: Ways of presenting pronunciation; Listen-and-repeat practice; Explicit/analytic practice activities; Sounds and spelling; Use of phonemic symbols; Speech perception and awareness raising. The findings are discussed in terms of factors driving teacher behaviour, advice that can be given to language teachers and teacher educators and areas that need further research.
Keywords: pronunciation teaching, teacher cognition, pronunciation teaching techniques, teacher beliefs, teacher practices
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Theory and research related to pronunciation teaching techniques
    • 1.2Teacher cognition of pronunciation teaching techniques
    • 1.3Aims and research questions
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
      • Interview participants
      • Observation participants
    • 2.2Data collection and analysis
      • 2.2.1Interviews
      • 2.2.2Observations and follow-up discussions
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Presenting pronunciation: Intuitive/imitative – explicit/analytic
      • Interview data
      • Observation data
    • 3.2Intuitive/imitative practice
      • Interview data
      • Observation data
    • 3.3Explicit/analytic practice activities
      • Interview data
      • Observation data
    • 3.4Sounds and spelling
      • Interview data
      • Observation data
    • 3.5Use of phonemic symbols
      • Interview data
      • Observation data
    • 3.6Speech perception and awareness raising
      • Interview data
      • Observation data
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Teachers’ beliefs and actions
    • 4.2Motivations for teachers’ choices
    • 4.3Implications
  • 5.Conclusion
    • 5.1Limitations and further research
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 28 January 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20004.cou
References (40)
References
Baker, A. (2014). Exploring teachers’ knowledge of second language pronunciation techniques: Teacher cognitions, observed classroom practices, and student perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 481, 136–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Research on teacher cognition and pronunciation instruction: Implications for teachers. Retrieved from [URL]
Burns, A., Freeman, D., & Edwards, E. (2015). Theorizing and studying the language-teaching mind: Mapping research on language teacher cognition. Modern Language Journal, 991, 585–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buss, L. (2016). Beliefs and practices of Brazilian EFL teachers regarding pronunciation. Language Teaching Research 20(5): 619–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., Goodwin, J., & Griner, B. (2010). Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Couper, G. (2011). What makes pronunciation teaching work? Testing for the effect of two variables: Socially Constructed Metalanguage and Critical Listening. Language Awareness, 20(3), 159–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Applying theories of language and learning to teaching pronunciation. In M. Reed, & J. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 413–432). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016a). Teacher cognition of pronunciation teaching amongst English language teachers in Uruguay. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 2(1), 29–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b). New Zealand teacher cognition of pronunciation teaching: Survey results. TESOLANZ Journal, 241, 20–37.Google Scholar
(2017). Teacher cognition of pronunciation teaching: Teachers’ concerns and issues. TESOL Quarterly, 51(4), 820–843. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Teachers’ cognitions of corrective feedback on pronunciation: Their beliefs, perceptions and practices. System 841, 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darcy, I. (2018). Powerful and effective pronunciation instruction: How can we achieve it? The CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 13–45.Google Scholar
Derwing, T., & Munro, M. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Foote, J. A., Waugh, E., & Fleming, J. (2014). Opening the window on comprehensible pronunciation after 19 years: A workplace training study. Language Learning, 641, 526–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, H. (2001). Teaching pronunciation: A handbook for teachers and trainers. Sydney, Australia: TAFE NSW Access Division. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from [URL]
(2009). Pronunciation as categorization: The role of contrast in teaching English /r/ and /l/. In A. Mahboob & C. Lipovsky (Eds.), Studies in applied linguistics and language learning (pp. 289–306). Newcastle, Australia: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Grant, L. (Ed.). (2014). Pronunciation myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R. (2018). How does orthography affect pronunciation in a second language? Retrieved from [URL]
Henderson, A., Frost, D., Tergujeff, E., Kautzsch, A., Murphy, D., Kirkova-Naskova, A., Waniek-Klimczak, E., Levey, D., Cunningham, U., & Curnick, L. (2012). The English pronunciation teaching in Europe survey: Selected results. Research in Language, 10(1), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hismanoglu, M., & Hismanoglu, S. (2010). Language teachers’ preferences of pronunciation teaching techniques: Traditional or modern? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 983–989. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, S., Blanchet, J., & Trofimovich, P. (2014). Learner pronunciation, awareness, and instruction in French as a second language. Foreign Language Annals 47(1), 79–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubanyiova, M., & Feryok, A. (2015). Language teacher cognition in applied linguistics research: Revisiting the territory, redrawing the boundaries, reclaiming the relevance. The Modern Language Journal, 991, 435–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 361, 345–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M. & Silpachai, A. O. (2018). Prominence and information structure in pronunciation teaching materials. In J. Levis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching conference, ISSN 2380-9566, University of Utah, September, 2017 (pp. 216–229). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Macdonald, S. (2002). Pronunciation views and practices of reluctant teachers. Prospect, 17(3), 3–18.Google Scholar
Mompean, J. (2014). Cognitive Linguistics and phonology. In J. Littlemore & J. Taylor (Eds.), Bloomsbury companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 253–276). London, England: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. (2014). Intelligible, comprehensible, non-native models in ESL/EFL pronunciation teaching. System, 421, 258–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.). (2017). Teaching the pronunciation of English: Focus on whole courses. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennington, M., & Rogerson-Revell, P. (2017). English pronunciation teaching and Research: Contemporary perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69(3). 652–708. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smotrova, T. (2017). Making pronunciation visible: Gesture in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1): 59–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starfield, S. (2010). Ethnographies. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Continuum companion to research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 50–65). London, England: Continuum.Google Scholar
Szyska, M. (2016). English pronunciation teaching at different educational levels: Insights into teachers’ perceptions and actions. Research in Language 14 (2): 165–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tergujeff, E. (2012). English pronunciation teaching: Four case studies from Finland. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 31: 599–607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R. (2012). Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A computer-mediated approach. Language Learning, 621, 1231–1258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R., & Derwing, T. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics 36(3), 326–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zielinski, B., & Yates, L. (2014). Myth 2: Pronunciation instruction is not appropriate for beginning-level learners. In L. Grant (Ed.), Pronunciation myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching (pp. 56–79). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Ahmed, Hafiz Nauman & Saqib Mahmood
2024. Focus on form, forms, or meaning in grammar instruction: a study of Pakistani university EFL teachers’ cognition and practices. Language Learning in Higher Education 14:2 ► pp. 435 ff. DOI logo
Blake, John, Natalia Bogach, Akemi Kusakari, Iurii Lezhenin, Veronica Khaustova, Son Luu Xuan, Van Nhi Nguyen, Nam Ba Pham, Roman Svechnikov, Andrey Ostapchuk, Dmitrei Efimov & Evgeny Pyshkin
2024. An Open CAPT System for Prosody Practice: Practical Steps towards Multilingual Setup. Languages 9:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Gordon, Joshua & Roger Segura Arias
2024. “The Most Important Thing Is to Make Them Aware”: A Case Study of Teacher Metalanguage Knowledge and Explicit L2 Pronunciation Instruction. TESOL Quarterly 58:4 ► pp. 1666 ff. DOI logo
Playsted, Skye, Damon P. Thomas & Jane Wilkinson
2024. Exploratory practice puzzling as praxis-oriented pronunciation teacher learning in Australian adult migrant EAL education. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Topal, Ibrahim Halil
2024. An edusemiotic approach to teaching intonation in the context of English language teacher education. Semiotica 2024:259 ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Pyshkin, Evgeny, Akemi Kusakari, John Blake, Nam Ba Pham & Natalia Bogach
2023. 2023 14th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Sweeting, Arizio M. & Michael D. Carey
2023. What pronunciation specialists believe CELTA tutors need to know to prepare student teachers to teach pronunciation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
Couper, Graeme
2022. Effective Feedback for Pronunciation Teaching. In Second Language Pronunciation, ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Kochem, Tim & John Levis
2022. Evolving Teaching Practices of Pre-service Language Teachers in L2 Pronunciation: A Case Study. Recherches anglaises et nord-américaines :55 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.