Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 9:2 (2023) ► pp.208233
Baese-Berk, M. M.
(2019) Interactions between speech perception and production during learning of novel phonemic categories. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 81(4), 981–1005. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohn, O.-S.
(1995) Cross-language speech perception in adults: first language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research (pp. 279–304). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E.
(1995) Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research (pp. 233–276). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S.
(2021) The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In R. Wayland (Ed.) Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardison, D. M., & Saigo, M. M.
(2010) Development of perception of second language Japanese geminates: Role of duration, sonority, and segmentation strategy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31 (1), 81–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirata, Y.
(2004) Training native English speakers to perceive Japanese length contrasts in word versus sentence contexts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116 (4), 2384–2394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirata, Y., Whitehurst, E., & Cullings, E.
(2007) Training native English speakers to identify Japanese vowel length contrast with sentences at varied speaking rates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121 (6), 3837–3845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isei-Jaakkola, T.
(2004) Lexical quantity in Japanese and Finnish. University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kirmse, U., Ylinen, S., Tervaniemi, M., Vainio, M., Schröger, E., & Jacobsen, T.
(2008) Modulation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) to vowel duration changes in native speakers of Finnish and German as a result of language experience. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 67 (2), 131–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, J.
(1970) Aspects of quantity in standard Finnish. Studia Philologica Jyväskyläensia VI. University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
McAllister, R., Flege, J. E., & Piske, T.
(2002) The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics, 30 (2), 229–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meister, E., Nemoto, R. & Meister, L.
(2015) Production of Estonian quantity contrasts by Japanese speakers. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH (Vol. 61, pp. 330–334). International Speech and Communication Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
(1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okuno, T.
(2014) Acquisition of L2 Vowel Duration in Japanese by Native English Speakers. Dissertation Abstracts International. Michigan State University.
Okuno, T., & Hardison, D. M.
(2016) Perception-production link in L2 Japanese vowel duration: Training with technology. Language Learning and Technology, 20 (2), 61–80.Google Scholar
Rogers, T. T., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L.
(2009) U-shaped curves in development: a PDP approach. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5(1), 137–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saloranta, A., Alku, P., & Peltola, M. S.
(2017) Learning and generalization of vowel duration with production training: behavioral results. Linguistica Lettica, 251, 67–87.Google Scholar
(2020) Listen-and-repeat training improves perception of second language vowel duration: Evidence from mismatch negativity (MMN) and N1 responses and behavioral discrimination. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 1471(November 2019), 72–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, A., & Strange, W.
(1982) The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 243–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suomi, K., Toivanen, J., & Ylitalo, R.
(2008) Finnish Sound Structure. Phonetics, phonology, phonotactics and prosody. Oulu University Press.Google Scholar
Tajima, K., Kato, H., Rothwell, A., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Munhall, K. G.
(2008) Training English listeners to perceive phonemic length contrasts in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123 (1), 397–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsukada, K.
(2012) Comparison of native versus nonnative perception of vowel length contrasts in Arabic and Japanese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(3), 501–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tulaja, L.
(2019) Dänische L2-Aussprache von Lernern mit Deutsch als Ausgangssprache : Fehler und Fehlerschwere [German L2 Danish Learners’ Pronunciation : Typical Errors and Error Gravity]. Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiik, K.
(1965) Finnish and English vowels: A comparison with special reference to the learning problems met by native speakers of Finnish learning English. University of Turku.Google Scholar
Ylinen, S., Shestakova, A., Alku, P., & Huotilainen, M.
(2005) The perception of phonological quantity based on durational cues by native Speakers, second-language users and nonspeakers of Finnish. Language and Speech, 48 (3), 313–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar