Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 9:1 (2023) ► pp.4770
References (60)
References
Akiyama, Y. (2017). Learner beliefs and corrective feedback in telecollaboration: A longitudinal investigation. System, 64 1, 58–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al-Busaidi, S., & Al-Saqqaf, A. H. (2015). English spelling errors made by Arabic-speaking students. English Language Teaching, 8 (7), 181–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berggren, J. (2015). Learning from giving feedback: A study of secondary-level students. ELT Journal, 69 (1), 58–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coté, R. A. (2014). Peer feedback in anonymous peer review in an EFL writing class in Spain. GiST Education and Learning Research Journal, 9 1, 67–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (1), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39 (3), 379–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Comprehensibility as a factor in listener interaction preferences: Implications for the workplace. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66 (2), 181–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63 (2), 163–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (3), 50–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, J. C., & Grabinger, S. (2003). Preparing students for lifelong learning: A review of instructional features and teaching methodologies. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 16 (2), 6–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evers, K., & Chen, S. (2020). Effects of an automatic speech recognition system with peer feedback on pronunciation instruction for adults. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26 (3), 402–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujii, A., Ziegler, N., & Mackey, A. (2016). Peer interaction and metacognitive instruction in the EFL classroom. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger. (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 63–89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, D., Rueckert, D., Kim, D. -J., & Seo, D. (2013). Students’ perceptions and experiences of mobile learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17 (3), 52–73. [URL]
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning. In C. A. Chapelle. (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 743–750). Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. (2016). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R (2nd ed.). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, A. H., & Lyster, R. (2016a). The effects of corrective feedback on instructed L2 speech perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38 (1), 35–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b). Effects of different types of corrective feedback on receptive skills in a second language: A speech perception training study. Language Learning, 66 (4), 809–833. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36 (3), 345–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, G. Y. (2018). Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system. Computers & Education, 116 1, 81–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6 (2), 100–115. [URL]
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18 (1), 30–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luo, B. (2016). Evaluating a computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) technique for efficient classroom instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29 (3). 451–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacMahon, M. K. C. (1991). The woman behind ‘Arthur’. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 21 (1), 29–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, I. A., & Sippel, L. (2021a). Is giving better than receiving?: The effects of peer and teacher feedback on L2 pronunciation skills. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 7 (1), 62–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021b). Providing vs. receiving peer feedback: Learners’ beliefs and experiences. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45 (1), 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29 (2), 191–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64 (4), 878–912. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Ranta, L., & Lyster, R. (2018). Form-focused instruction. In P. Garrett & J. Cots. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 40–56). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roach, P. (2004). British English: Received pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 34 (2), 239–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rouhi, A., & Azizian, E. (2013). Peer review: Is giving corrective feedback better than receiving it in L2 writing? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93 1, 1349–1354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K. (2011). Examining the role of explicit phonetic instruction in native-like and comprehensible pronunciation development: An instructed SLA approach to L2 phonology. Language Awareness, 20 (1), 45–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). The acquisitional value of recasts in instructed second language speech learning: Teaching the perception and production of English /ɹ/ to adult Japanese learners. Language Learning, 63 (3), 499–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021a). Effects of corrective feedback on second language pronunciation development. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in second language learning and teaching (pp. 407–428). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021b). What characterizes comprehensible and native-like pronunciation among English-as-a-second-language speakers? Meta-analyses of phonological, rater, and instructional factors. TESOL Quarterly, 55 (3), 866–900. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62 (2), 595–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., & Wu, X. (2014). Communicative focus on form and second language suprasegmental learning: Teaching Cantonese learners to perceive Mandarin tones. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36 (4), 647–680. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Sun, H., & Tierney, A. (2019). Explicit and implicit aptitude effects on second language speech learning: Scrutinizing segmental and suprasegmental sensitivity and performance via behavioural and neurophysiological measures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22 (5), 1123–1140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, M. (2013). Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97 (3), 611–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Oral peer corrective feedback: Multiple theoretical perspectives. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava. (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 19–34). Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2016). Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34 (4), 591–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharbawi, S. (2012). Revisiting the vowels of Brunei English. World Englishes, 31 (2), 177–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sippel, L. (2019). The impact of peer corrective feedback on vocabulary development. Foreign Language Annals, 52 (3), 595–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sippel, L., & Jackson, C. N. (2015). Teacher vs. peer oral corrective feedback in the German language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 48 (4), 688–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sippel, L., & Martin, I. A. (2022). Immediate and long-term improvement in lexical stress perception: The role of teacher and peer feedback. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36 (3), 326–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toth, P. D. (2008). Teacher- and learner-led discourse in task-based grammar instruction: Providing procedural assistance for L2 morphosyntactic development. Language Learning, 58 (2), 237–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (1), 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villamil, O. S., & De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5 (1), 51–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Y. (2019). Review of Chinese English learners’ prosodic acquisition. English Language Teaching, 12 (8), 89–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15 (3), 179–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, S., & Hu, G. (2017). Understanding university students’ peer feedback practices in EFL writing: Insights from a case study. Assessing Writing, 33 1, 25–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, R., & Yuan, Z. M. (2020). Examining the effects of explicit pronunciation instruction on the development of L2 pronunciation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42 (4), 905–918. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Q., & Carless, D. (2018). Dialogue within peer feedback processes: Clarification and negotiation of meaning. Higher Education Research & Development, 37 (4), 883–897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar