Article published in:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 3:2 (2017) ► pp. 167–198

Processing time and comprehensibility judgments in non-native listeners’ perception of L2 speech

| | Universitat de Barcelona
|
This study investigated the relationship between processing time and comprehensibility judgments in non-native listeners’ perception of L2 speech as a function of an L1- match between speaker and listener and non-native listeners’ proficiency. Instructed L2-English learners differing in L1 (Catalan, German) and L2-proficiency (Low, High), and native-English listeners performed speeded speech processing tasks with English word and sentence stimuli spoken by L1-Catalan, L1-German and native English speakers, and rated the sentence stimuli for comprehensibility. The results showed significant moderate correlations between processing times and comprehensibility judgments mediated by an interaction between listeners’ L1 and their L2 proficiency. Non-native English was processed faster and judged to be more comprehensible by non-native listeners if produced by L1-matched speakers. When non-native English was produced by L1-matched speakers, low-proficiency listeners found it easier to process and understand than native English, whereas high-proficiency listeners showed a processing advantage over native English listeners
Keywords: processing time, comprehensibility, accent, L2 proficiency, L2 speech, non-native listeners
Published online: 04 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.2.01lud
References

References

Adank, P., Evans, B., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scott, S.
(2009) Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(2), 520–529.Google Scholar
Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R.
(2003) The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(3), 1600–1610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broersma, M., & Scharenborg, O.
(2010) Native and non-native listeners’ perception of English consonants in different types of noise. Speech Communication, 52(11), 980–995. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D.
(2011) Vocabulary size is associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(3), 433–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F.
(2004) Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(6), 3647–3658. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., & Titone, D.
(1993) Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32(2), 193–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K.
(2015a) Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T.
(2015b) Second language comprehensibility revisited: Investigating the effects of learner background. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 814–837. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
(1997) Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G.
(1998) Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48, 393–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J.
(2002) The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 175–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Munro, M. J.
(1994) The word unit in second language speech production and perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(4), 381–411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Floccia, C., Butler, J., Goslin, J., & Ellis, L.
(2009) Regional and foreign accent processing in English: Can listeners adapt? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38(4), 379–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Floccia, C., Goslin, J., Girard, F., & Konopczynski, G.
(2006) Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1276–1293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goslin, J., Duffy, H., & Floccia, C.
(2012) An ERP investigation of regional and foreign accent processing. Brain and language, 122(2), 92–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Smith, B., Bent, T., & Bradlow, A.
(2008) The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for NSs of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 664–679. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P.
(2012) Deconstructing comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 475–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J.
(2002) A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23, 83–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ju, M., & Luce, P. A.
(2004) Falling on sensitive ears: Constraints on bilingual lexical activation. Psychological Science, 15(5), 314–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P.
(2008) Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(3), 459–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W.
(2012) The influence of sentence context and accented speech on lexical access in second-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(3), 508–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M.
(2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Pronunciation and the assessment of spoken language. In R. Hughes (Ed.), Spoken English, TESOL and applied linguistics: Challenges for theory and practice (pp. 245–270). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meara, P., & Miralpeix, I.
(2016) Tools for researching vocabulary. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
(1995a) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 285–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995b) Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 289–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning, 48(2), 159–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M., Derwing, T., & Morton, S.
(2006) The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 111–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P.
(2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortmeyer, C., & Boyle, J.
(1985) The effect of accent differences on comprehension. RELC Journal, 16(2), 48–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinet, M., Iverson, P., & Huckvale, M.
(2011) Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: The role of L2 experience and acoustic similarity in the talker-listener accent interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(3), 1653–1662. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
(2015a) Using listener judgments to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Webb, S., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
(2016) Lexical correlates of comprehensibility versus accentedness in second language speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 597–609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Frenkiel-Fishman, S.
(2005) Attention control and ability level in a complex cognitive skill: Attention shifting and second-language proficiency. Memory and Cognition, 33(4), 644–653. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Hulstijn, J.
(2005) Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In J. Kroll & A. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 371–388). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stibbard, R., & Lee, J.
(2006) Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 433–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Wijngaarden, S. J., Steeneken, H. J. M., & Houtgast, T.
(2002) Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for NNLs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(4), 1906–1916. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weber, A., Broersma, M., & Aoyagi, M.
(2011) Spoken-word recognition in foreign-accented speech by L2 listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 479–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Saito, Kazuya
2020. Multi‐ or Single‐Word Units? The Role of Collocation Use in Comprehensible and Contextually Appropriate Second Language Speech. Language Learning 70:2 ► pp. 548 ff. Crossref logo
Saito, Kazuya & Yuwei Liu
2021. Roles of collocation in L2 oral proficiency revisited: Different tasks, L1 vs. L2 raters, and cross-sectional vs. longitudinal analyses. Second Language Research ► pp. 026765832098805 ff. Crossref logo
Saito, Kazuya, Mai Tran, Yui Suzukida, Hui Sun, Viktoria Magne & Meltem Ilkan
2019. HOW DO SECOND LANGUAGE LISTENERS PERCEIVE THE COMPREHENSIBILITY OF FOREIGN-ACCENTED SPEECH?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:5 ► pp. 1133 ff. Crossref logo
Saito, Kazuya, Pavel Trofimovich, Mariko Abe & Yo In'nami
2020. Dunning-Kruger effect in second language speech learning: How does self perception align with other perception over time?. Learning and Individual Differences 79 ► pp. 101849 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.