Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation
Vol. 3:2 (2017) ► pp.199–217

Linguistic correlates of comprehensibility in second language Japanese speech

| | Birkbeck, University of London |
| | Georgetown University |
This study examined phonological, temporal, lexical and grammatical correlates of native speakers’ perception of second language (L2) comprehensibility (i.e., ease of understanding). L2 learners of Japanese with various proficiency levels engaged in oral picture description tasks which were judged by native speaking raters for comprehensibility, and then submitted to pronunciation, fluency, and lexicogrammar analyses. According to correlation analyses and linear mixed-models, the native speaking judges’ comprehensibility ratings were significantly linked not only with actual usage of words in context (lexical appropriateness) but also with the surface details of words (pitch accent, speech rate, lexical variation). Similar to previous L2 English studies (e.g., Isaacs & Trofimovich, 2012), the influence of segmental and morphological errors in the comprehensibility of L2 Japanese speech appeared to be minor.
Keywords: comprehensibility, second language speech, Japanese, pronunciation, fluency, vocabulary, grammar
Article outline
  • 1.Background
    • 1.1Second language comprehensibility
    • 1.2Rater backgrounds
  • 2.Motivation for current study
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
      • 3.1.1Speakers
      • 3.1.2Raters
    • 3.2Speech materials
    • 3.3Global analyses
    • 3.4Linguistic analyses of L2 Japanese
      • 3.4.1Segmentals
      • 3.4.2Pitch accent
      • 3.4.3Intonation
      • 3.4.4Fluency
      • 3.4.5Vocabulary
      • 3.4.6Grammar
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Inter-rater reliability
    • 4.2Experts vs. novices
    • 4.3Linguistic correlates of comprehensibility
    • 4.4Linear mixed-effects model analyses
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Limitations
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.2.02sai
References (43)
References
Akagi, H., Uchida, N., & Furuichi, Y. (2010). Rizumu de minitsuku nihongo no hatsuon [Learning Japanese pronunciation with rhythms]. Tokyo: Three A Network.Google Scholar
Akiyama, Y., & Saito, K. (2016). Development of comprehensibility and its linguistic correlates: A longitudinal study of video-mediated telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 1001, 585–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, K., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of non-native pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 421, 529–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K. (2015). Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility? Modern Language Journal, 991, 80–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A. F., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). Facets of speaking proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 341, 5–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 121, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 481, 393–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., & Ehrensberger-Dow, M. (2002). “They speaked and wrote real good”: Judgements of non-native and native grammar. Language Awareness, 111, 84–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). L2 fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 541, 655–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 971, 3125–3134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foote, J., Holtby, A., & Derwing, T. M. (2011). Survey of the teaching of pronunciation in adult ESL programs in Canada, 2010. TESL Canada Journal, 291, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Wigglesworth, G. (2016). Capturing accuracy in second language performance: The case for a weighted clause ratio. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 98–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahn, L. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 381, 201–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatakeyama, M. (2014, March). Corpus analysis of vocabulary by OPI proficiency levels: Interviews from Database of Japanese Language Learners Conversation (DJLLC). Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Association of Japanese Teachers, Philadelphia, PA.
Hulstijn, J. H., Schoonen, R., De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., & Florijn, A. (2012). Linguistic competences of learners of Dutch as a second language at the B1 and B2 levels of speaking proficiency of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Language Testing, 291, 203–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, T. (2008). Towards defining a valid assessment criterion of pronunciation proficiency in non-native English-speaking graduate students. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 641, 555–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, T., & Thomson, R. I. (2013). Rater experience, rating scale length, and judgments of L2 pronunciation: Revisiting research conventions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 101, 135–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 341, 475–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jułkowska, I. A., & Cebrian, J. (2015). Effects of listener factors and stimulus properties on the intelligibility, comprehensibility and accentedness of L2 speech. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 11, 211–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Pickering, L. (2010). Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of English language learner proficiency in oral English. Modern Language Journal, 941, 554–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 641, 459–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koizumi, R., & In’nami, Y. (2013). Vocabulary knowledge and speaking proficiency among second language learners from novice to intermediate levels. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 41, 900–913. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 391, 367–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Major, R., Fitzmaurice, S., Bunta, F., & Balasubramanian, C. (2002). The Effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 361, 173–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McBride, K. (2015). Which features of Spanish learners' pronunciation most impact listener evaluations? Hispania, 981, 14–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 451, 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 231, 451–468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 341, 520–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, M. G. (2014). L2 learners’ assessments of accentedness, fluency, and comprehensibility of native and nonnative German speech. Language Learning, 641, 715–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., Iwashita, N., Norris, J. M., & Rabie, S. (2002, October). An investigation of elicited imitation tasks in crosslinguistic SLA research. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Toronto.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I., & Flege, J. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accents in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 291, 191–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., & Shintani, N. (2016). Do native speakers of North American and Singapore English differentially perceive second language comprehensibility? TESOL Quarterly, 501, 421–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2015). Using listener judgements to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 371, 217–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Webb, S. (2017). Re-examining phonological and lexical correlates of second language comprehensibility: The role of rater experience. In T. Isaacs & P. Trofimovich (Eds.), Second language pronunciation assessment: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 261, 173–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toda, T. (2003). Acquisition of special morae in Japanese as a second language. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 7(2), 70–83.Google Scholar
Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. (1982). The comprehensibility of non-native speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 114–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warner, N., & Arai, T. (2001). The role of the mora in the timing of spontaneous Japanese speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(3), 1144–1156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Myford, C. (2013). Raters’ L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance. Language Testing, 301, 231–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 241, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (15)

Cited by 15 other publications

Díez-Ortega, María & Kristopher Kyle
2024. Measuring the development of lexical richness of L2 Spanish: A longitudinal learner corpus study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 46:1 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Ghaffarvand-Mokari, Payam
2024. Effects of listeners’ dialectal variation on comprehensibility and accentedness judgements of second language speech. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 10:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Isbell, Daniel R., Junkyu Lee & Juhyun Jang
2024. Linguistic influences on comprehensibility and accentedness in second language Korean speech. International Journal of Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Yenkimaleki, Mahmood & Vincent J. van Heuven
2024. The effect of fluency training on interpreter trainees’ speech fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Crowther, Dustin & Daniel R. Isbell
2023. Second language speech comprehensibility: A research agenda. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Saito, Kazuya, Konstantinos Macmillan, Magdalena Kachlicka, Takuya Kunihara & Nobuaki Minematsu
2023. Automated assessment of second language comprehensibility: Review, training, validation, and generalization studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:1 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Gayed, John Maurice, May Kristine Jonson Carlon, Angelu Mari Oriola & Jeffrey S. Cross
2022. Exploring an AI-based writing Assistant's impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 3 ► pp. 100055 ff. DOI logo
Suzukida, Yui & Kazuya Saito
2022. What is second language pronunciation proficiency? An empirical study. System 106 ► pp. 102754 ff. DOI logo
Derwing, Tracey M., Erin Waugh & Murray J. Munro
2021. Pragmatically speaking. Applied Pragmatics 3:2 ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Huensch, Amanda & Charlie Nagle
2021. The Effect of Speaker Proficiency on Intelligibility, Comprehensibility, and Accentedness in L2 Spanish: A Conceptual Replication and Extension of Munro and Derwing (1995a). Language Learning 71:3 ► pp. 626 ff. DOI logo
Saito, Kazuya
2021. What Characterizes Comprehensible and Native‐like Pronunciation Among English‐as‐a‐Second‐Language Speakers? Meta‐Analyses of Phonological, Rater, and Instructional Factors. TESOL Quarterly 55:3 ► pp. 866 ff. DOI logo
Nagle, Charles L. & Amanda Huensch
2020. Expanding the scope of L2 intelligibility research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 6:3 ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Nagle, Charles L. & Amanda Huensch
2022. Expanding the scope of L2 intelligibility research. In The Evolution of Pronunciation Teaching and Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 121], ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Crowther, Dustin & Susan M. Gass
2019. Speaking. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning, ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Levis, John M.
2018. Technology and second language pronunciation. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 4:2 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.