Introduction published in:
Aptitude-treatment interaction in second language learning
Edited by Robert M. DeKeyser
[Journal of Second Language Studies 2:2] 2019
► pp. 165168
References

[ p. 168 ]References

Cronbach, L. J.
(1957) The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1975) Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E.
(1977) Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York, NY: Irvington.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M.
(2012) Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62(Suppl. 2), 189–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(2017) Knowledge and skill in SLA. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), Handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 15–32). London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hauptman, P. C.
(1971) A structural approach versus a situational approach to foreign-language teaching. Language Learning, 21, 235–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B.
(1980) Theory and research in second-language learning: An emerging paradigm. Language Learning, 30, 331–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(Ed.) (2002) Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1989) Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Vatz, K., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., & Doughty, C. J.
(2013) Aptitude-treatment interaction studies in second language acquisition. In G. Granena & M. H. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 273–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Elek, T., & Oskarsson, M.
(1975) Comparative method experiments in foreign language teaching. The final report of the GUME/Adults project. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Wesche, M.
(1981) Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learner problems. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 119–154). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Mohammad Javad Ahmadian & Michael H. Long
2021.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, Crossref logo
Bahari, Akbar
2020. CANDA: computer-assisted nonlinear dynamic approach for the L2 teaching in blended and distance learning. Interactive Learning Environments  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Bokander, Lars
2020. Language Aptitude and Crosslinguistic Influence in Initial L2 Learning. Journal of the European Second Language Association 4:1  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
DeKeyser, Robert & Shaofeng Li
2021. EPILOGUE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:3  pp. 692 ff. Crossref logo
Révész, Andrea
2021.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching,  pp. 605 ff. Crossref logo
Suzuki, Yuichi
2021. Individual differences in memory predict changes in breakdown and repair fluency but not speed fluency: A short-term fluency training intervention study. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:4  pp. 969 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.