Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Aptitude-treatment interaction in second language learning
Edited by Robert M. DeKeyser
[Journal of Second Language Studies 2:2] 2019
► pp. 165–168
Introduction

Aptitude-treatment interaction in second language learning

Introduction to the special issue

| University of Maryland, College Park


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 8 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00007.int
References

References

Cronbach, L. J.
(1957) The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 121, 671–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1975) Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 301, 116–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E.
(1977) Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York, NY: Irvington.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M.
(2012) Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62(Suppl. 2), 189–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(2017) Knowledge and skill in SLA. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), Handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 15–32). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hauptman, P. C.
(1971) A structural approach versus a situational approach to foreign-language teaching. Language Learning, 211, 235–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B.
(1980) Theory and research in second-language learning: An emerging paradigm. Language Learning, 301, 331–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(Ed.) (2002) Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1989) Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Vatz, K., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., & Doughty, C. J.
(2013) Aptitude-treatment interaction studies in second language acquisition. In G. Granena & M. H. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 273–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Elek, T., & Oskarsson, M.
(1975) Comparative method experiments in foreign language teaching. The final report of the GUME/Adults project. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Wesche, M.
(1981) Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learner problems. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 119–154). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Mohammad Javad Ahmadian & Michael H. Long
2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Bahari, Akbar
2023. CANDA: computer-assisted nonlinear dynamic approach for the L2 teaching in blended and distance learning. Interactive Learning Environments 31:2 ► pp. 752 ff. DOI logo
Bokander, Lars
2020. Language Aptitude and Crosslinguistic Influence in Initial L2 Learning. Journal of the European Second Language Association 4:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
DeKeyser, Robert & Shaofeng Li
2021. EPILOGUE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:3 ► pp. 692 ff. DOI logo
Révész, Andrea
2021. Methodological Approaches to Investigating Task-Based Language Teaching. In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 605 ff. DOI logo
Suzuki, Yuichi
2021. Individual differences in memory predict changes in breakdown and repair fluency but not speed fluency: A short-term fluency training intervention study. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:4 ► pp. 969 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.