Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 6:1 (2023) ► pp.146–182

The neural correlates of second language syntax

Implicit and explicit instruction

| Tarbiat Modares University, Iran
| Tarbiat Modares University, Iran
An important dimension that characterizes the contextual differences in second language acquisition (SLA) is the degree to which instruction is implicit or explicit. However, whether these differences in context play a role in determining the neural activity to process L2 grammar has not been well characterized. The present study investigated this issue by comparing the neural regions activated in response to novel L2 syntactic rules acquired under conditions of implicit and explicit instruction. In addition, participants’ declarative and procedural memories were measured to better understand the mediating effect of memory during learning under different conditions. Explicitly and implicitly instructed learners showed statistically indistinguishable behavioral performance. Region of interest (ROI) analysis also revealed that the task activated both declarative and procedural memory structures suggesting that instructional context did not affect the recruitment of memory systems when processing L2 syntax.
Keywords: implicit instruction, explicit instruction, L2 syntax, declarative memory, procedural memory
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of literature
    • 2.1Theories of L2 neurocognition: The declarative/procedural model
    • 2.2Relevant empirical neurocognitive research on the implicit-explicit issue
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Materials: The mini-language (Mini-French)
    • 3.3Procedure
      • 3.3.1Training and practice phase
      • 3.3.2Testing phase
        • 3.3.2.1Grammaticality judgment task (GJT)
        • 3.3.2.2Measure of declarative memory learning ability
        • 3.3.2.3Measure of procedural memory learning ability
        • 3.3.2.4Debriefing questionnaire
    • 3.4MRI data acquisition
    • 3.5Analyses
      • 3.5.1Behavioral data analysis
      • 3.5.2fMRI data analysis
        • 3.5.2.1Region of interest (ROI) analyses
        • 3.5.2.2Analyses of the relationship between the brain and behavior
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Behavioral results
    • 4.2fMRI results
      • 4.2.1Relationship between the brain and behavior
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Limitations and future research
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Conflict of interest statement
  • References
Published online: 7 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00019.vei
References (69)
References
Abutalebi, J. (2008). Neural aspects of second language representation and language control. Acta Psychologica, 128 (3), 466–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andringa, S., & Curcic, M. (2015). How explicit knowledge affects online L2 processing: Evidence from differential object marking acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37 (2), 237–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andringa, S., de Glopper, K., & Hacquebord, H. (2011). Effect of explicit and implicit instruction on free written response task performance. Language learning, 61 (3), 868–903. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, F. G., Turner, B. O., & Horvitz, J. C. (2010). Cortical and basal ganglia contributions to habit learning and automaticity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (5), 208–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batterink, L., & Neville, H. (2013). Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25 (6), 936–951. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M. A. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33 (2), 247–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brill-Schuetz, K., & Morgan-Short, K. (2014). The role of procedural memory in adult second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27 (1), 3–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dale, A. M. (1999). Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 8 (2–3), 109–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Destrebecqz, A., Peigneux, P., Laureys, S., Degueldre, C., Del Fiore, G., Aerts, J., ... & Maquet, P. (2005). The neural correlates of implicit and explicit sequence learning: Interacting networks revealed by the process dissociation procedure. Learning & Memory, 12 (5), 480–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. (2004). Effects of instruction on learning a second language: A critique of instructed SLA research. In VanPatten, B., Williams, J., Rott, S., & M. Overstree (Eds.), Form–meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 189–212). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Doyon, J., Bellec, P., Amsel, R., Penhune, V., Monchi, O., Carrier, J., ... & Benali, H. (2009). Contributions of the basal ganglia and functionally related brain structures to motor learning. Behavioural Brain Research, 199 (1), 61–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27 (2), 141–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3–25). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., Park, J. H., Gass, S., & Ellis, R. (2015). Timed and untimed grammaticality judgments measure distinct types of knowledge: Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37 (2), 269–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, U. & Novella, M. (2015). Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning: Norris & Ortega (2000) revisited and updated. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 443–482). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granena, G. (2013). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA language aptitude test. What aptitude does the LLAMA measure? In G. Granena, & M. H. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grey, S., & Tagarelli, K. M. (2018). Psycholinguistic Methods. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 287–312). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grey, S., Tagarelli, K. M., Turkeltaub, P. E., & Ullman, M. T. (2013). The functional neuroanatomy of adult second language: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Poster presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from [URL]
Hamrick, P. (2015). Declarative and procedural memory abilities as individual differences in incidental language learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 44 1, 9–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, A., Li, P., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (5), 220–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickok, G., & Small, S. L. (2016). Neurobiology of language: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hsieh, H.-C., Moreno, N., & Leow, R. P. (2015). Awareness, type of medium, and L2 development: Revisiting Hsieh (2008). In R. P. Leow, L. Cerezo, & M. Baralt (Eds.), A psycholinguistic approach to technology and language learning (pp. 131–150). Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002). Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage, 17 (2), 825–841. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkinson, M., & Smith, S. (2001). A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Medical Image Analysis, 5 (2), 143–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., & VanPatten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S. (2009). Grammaticality judgment tests and the measurement of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning testing and teaching (pp. 94–112). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lum, J. A., & Kidd, E. (2012). An examination of the associations among multiple memory systems, past tense, and vocabulary in typically developing 5-year-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55 (4), 989–1006. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Maie, R., & Godfroid, A. (2022). Controlled and automatic processing in the acceptability judgment task: An eye-tracking study. Language Learning, 72 (1), 158–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual. Swansea: Lognostics.Google Scholar
Morgan-Short, K. (2020). Insights into the neural mechanisms of becoming bilingual: A brief synthesis of second language research with artificial linguistic systems. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23 (1), 87–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Deng, Z., Brill-Schuetz, K. A., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., Wong, P. C., & Wong, F. C. (2015). A view of the neural representation of second language syntax through artificial language learning under implicit contexts of exposure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37 (2), 383–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Hamrick, P., & Ullman, M. T. (2022). Declarative and procedural memory as predictors of second language development. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp. 67–81). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60 (1), 154–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 (4), 933–947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19 (1), 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 (3), 417–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: implications for bilingualism. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of second languages (pp. 393–419). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Perani, D., & Abutalebi, J. (2005). The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15 (2), 202–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64 1, 878–912. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Presson, N., Davy, C., & MacWhinney, B. (2013). Experimentalized CALL for adult second language learners. Innovative research and practices in second language acquisition and bilingualism, 38 1, 139–164.Google Scholar
Roberts, L., González Alonso, J., Pliatsikas, C., & Rothman, J. (2018). Evidence from neurolinguistic methodologies: Can it actually inform linguistic/language acquisition theories and translate to evidence-based applications? Second Language Research, 34 (1), 125–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C. & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence vs. explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54 (1), 35–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63). Honolulu, Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
(2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebastian, R., Laird, A. R., & Kiran, S. (2011). Meta-analysis of the neural representation of first language and second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32 (4), 799–819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. M. (2002). Fast robust automated brain extraction. Human Brain Mapping, 17 (3), 143–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sok, S., Kang, E. Y., & Han, Z. (2019). Thirty-five years of ISLA on form-focused instruction: A methodological synthesis. Language Teaching Research, 23 (4), 403–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language learning, 60 (2), 263–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagarelli, K. M. (2014). The neurocognition of adult second language learning: An fMRI study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Georgetown University.
Tagarelli, K. M., Grey, S., Ullman, M. T., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2012). A comprehensive neuroanatomical meta-analysis of second language functional imaging studies. Poster presented at the 4th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neurobiology of Language, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Tagarelli, K. M., Shattuck, K. F., Turkeltaub, P. E., & Ullman, M. T. (2019). Language learning in the adult brain: A neuroanatomical meta-analysis of lexical and grammatical learning. NeuroImage, 193 1, 178–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2001a). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2 (10), 717–726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001b). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4 (2), 105–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/ procedural model. Cognition, 92 (1), 231–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory and practice (pp. 141–178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(2015). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 135–158). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2016). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge and use. In G. Hickok & S. A. Small (Eds.), The neurobiology of language (pp. 953–968). Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically motivated theory of first and second language. In B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 128–161). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T., & Lovelett, J. T. (2016). Implications of the declarative/procedural model for improving second language learning: The role of memory enhancement techniques. Second Language Research, 0267658316675195.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T., Earle, F. S., Walenski, M., & Janacsek, K. (2020). The neurocognition of developmental disorders of language. Annual Review of Psychology, 71 1, 389–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Rothman, J. (2014). Against ‘rules’. In A. Benati, C. Laval & M. J. Arche (Eds.), The grammar dimension in instructed second language acquisition: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 15–35). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wickens, T. D. (2002). Elementary signal detection theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woolrich, M. W., Ripley, B. D., Brady, M., & Smith, S. M. (2001). Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. Neuroimage, 14 (6), 1370–1386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Worsley, K. J. (2001). Statistical analysis of activation images. Functional MRI: An Introduction to Methods, 14 (1), 251–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, S., Liu, D., & Li, Z. (2022). Testing the Bottleneck Hypothesis: Chinese EFL learners’ knowledge of morphology and syntax across proficiency levels. Second Language Research, Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, J., & Li, P. (2012). Brain networks of explicit and implicit learning. PloS one, 7 (8), e42993. DOI logoGoogle Scholar