Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 2:1 (2019) ► pp.140–164

Topic prominence in L2 acquisition

Evidence of Chinese-to-English typological transfer

| Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center
This study investigated the topic-prominent characteristics of the interlanguage development of native speakers of Chinese learning English as a foreign language (EFL). Two groups of Chinese EFL learners – an intermediate group and an advanced group – were recruited to complete two production tasks: a written Chinese-to-English translation task and an oral story-retelling task. The findings showed that Chinese EFL learners at each proficiency level transferred Chinese topic-prominent structures to their target language production at a varying degree. The topic-prominent constructions in the learners’ production, based on a hierarchy of difficulty, were placed on two slightly different Gradation Zones, one for written production and the other for oral production. Gradation Zones were a generalized reflection of how discourse and pragmatic relations in topic-prominent Chinese were gradually reanalyzed as syntactic relations with the development of learners’ English proficiency level. There was a tendency for topic-prominent features to decrease and subject-prominent features to increase as EFL learners’ proficiency level progressed. It was also argued that sources of these topic-prominent properties in interlanguage were an interaction of factors, including degree of markedness, perceptual saliency, second language (L2) input, and language production task type.
Keywords: topic prominence, subject prominence, English as a foreign language, interlanguage, typological transfer, gradation zone, markedness, perceptual saliency
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Language typology: Chinese as a topic-prominent language
    • 2.2Topic-prominent features of Chinese
      • Non-verb-agreement
      • Sentence-initial position
      • Non-dummy-subject
      • Double-nominative constructions
      • Time and locative phrases
    • 2.3Studies on typological transfer of Chinese TP features in English L2 acquisition
  • 3.Research design and methodology
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Instruments and procedure
    • 3.3Test items
      • Absence of existential construction (aec)
      • Absence of dummy subject ‘it’ (ads)
      • Pseudo passive (pp)
      • Double nominative (dn)
      • Verbal subject (vs) (Green, 1996; Li, 2010)
      • Subject-predicate disagreement (spd) (Fuller & Gundel, 1987; Jin, 1994)
      • Zero anaphora subject (zas) and Zero anaphora object (zao)
    • 3.4Data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Written production analysis
    • 4.2Oral production analysis
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 18 April 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.17016.gon
References (65)
References
Bland, S. (1981). Topic/comment sentences in English. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, 21, 32–49.Google Scholar
Cai, J. T. (1998). The influence of Chinese topic-prominent features on Chinese EFL learners’ compositions. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 30(4), 17–21.Google Scholar
(2002). Topic structure transfer: An analysis of subjects loss in English output. Foreign Language Education, 23(4), 1–6.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In W. Chafe (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C., & Parker, K. (1990). Discourse markedness and structural markedness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 121, 43–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, P. (1987). Discourse and analysis of Chinese zero anaphor. Chinese, 51, 16–22.Google Scholar
Chen, P. T. (2009). Topic and topic-comment structures in first language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese. In Y. Xiao (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st North American Conference on Chinese linguistics (NACCL-21) (pp. 165–177). Smithfield, RD: Bryant University.Google Scholar
den Dikken, M. (2005). A comment on the topic of topic-comment. Lingua, 115(5), 691–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ding, S. (1961). Xiandai hanyu yufa jianghua [Talks on modern Chinese grammar]. Shanghai: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 271, 315–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuller, J. W., & Gundel, J. K. (1987). Topic-prominence in interlanguage. Language Learning, 27(1), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gasde, H.-D., & Paul, W. (1996). Functional categories, topic prominences, and complex sentences in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics, 341, 263–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (Eds.). (1992). Language transfer in language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givon, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givon (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 1–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, C. F. (1996). The origins and effects of topic-prominence in Chinese-English interlanguage. IRAL, 21, 119–134.Google Scholar
Green, C. F., Christopher, E. R., & Mei, J. (2000). The incidence and effects on coherence of marked themes in interlanguage texts: A corpus-based enquiry. English for Specific Purposes, 191, 99–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J. K. (1988). Universals of topic-comment structure. In M. Hammond, E. A. Moravcsik & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (pp. 209–239). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Z. (2000). Persistence of the implicit influence of NL: The case of the pseudo-passive. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 78–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, X. H. (1956). Studies of the problems of Chinese syntax. Shanghai, China: Xin Zhishi Publishing House.Google Scholar
Householder, F. W., & Cheng, R. L. (1967). Universe-scope relations in Chinese and Japanese. New York, NY: University of York.Google Scholar
Huang, S. F. (1973). Movement in Mandarin syntax. Bulletin of the College of Liberal Arts. National Taiwan University, No. 22.Google Scholar
Hwang, M. O. (1983). Topic continuity and discontinuity in Korean narrative. Korean Linguistics, 31, 47–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (1984). The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors in second language acquisition: The case of pronominal copies in relative clauses. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Second language: A crosslinguistic perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Jiang, Z. (1991). Some aspects of the syntax of topic and subject in Chinese. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Jin, H. G. (1994). Topic-prominence and subject-prominence in L2 acquisition: Evidence of English-to-Chinese typological transfer. Language Learning, 44(1), 101–122.Google Scholar
Jung, E. H. (2004). Topic and subject prominence in interlanguage development. Language Learning, 54(4), 713–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. Y. (1989). Nominal reference in discourse: Introduction and tracking referents in Korean spoken narratives. In S. Juno (Ed.), Proceedings of Harward Workshop on Korean linguistics. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
LaPolla, R. J. (1990). Grammatical relations in Chinese: Synchronic and diachronic considerations. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
(1993). Arguments against ‘subject’ and ‘direct object’ as viable concepts in Chinese. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, 63(4), 759–813.Google Scholar
LaPolla, R. J., & Poa, D. (2006). Describing word order. In F. Ameka, A. Dench & N. Evans (Eds.), Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing (pp. 269–295). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology. In C. Li & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Subject and topic (pp. 457–489). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, S., & Yang, L. (2014). Topic prominence in Chinese EFL learners’ inerlanguage. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 109–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). A discourse perspective of topic-prominence in Chinese EFL learners’ interlanguage. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(4), 190–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, X. (2010). The influence of Chinese topic-prominent features on the acquisition of four types of English subjects. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 80–94.Google Scholar
Lv, S. X. (1984). Hanyu Yufa Luwenji [A collection of essays on Chinese grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshu Guan.Google Scholar
Ma, J. (1983/1898). Mashi Wentong [Ma’s Grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Meng, W. Z. (1984). Zhuwei Weiyu Ju de Fanwei [On the subject-predicate predicate structure]. Beijing: Beijing University Press.Google Scholar
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-Linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qu, Y. (1994). Object noun phrase dislocation in Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Register, N. (1990). Influences of typological parameters on L2 learners’ judgment of null pronouns in English. Language Learning, 40(3), 369–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, W. E. (1983). Language typology and language transfer. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 358–370). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schachter, J., & Rutherford, W. (1979). Discourse function and language transfer. Working Paper on Bilingualism, 191, 1–12.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1966). A psycholinguistic study of language transfer. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Shi, D. (2000). Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language, 76(2), 383–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simargool, N. (2008). Interlanguage passive construction. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 97–103.Google Scholar
Tai, J. H-Y. (1973). A note on the ba-construction. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Language and Linguistics. San Diego, California.
Teng, S.-H. (1974). Double nominatives in Chinese. Language, 501, 455–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsao, F.-F. (1979). A functional study of topic in Chinese: The first step towards discourse analysis. Taipei: Student Book C.Google Scholar
(1990). Sentence and clause structure in Chinese: A functional perspective. Taipai: Student Books.Google Scholar
Wen, X. (1994). Topic prominence in the acquisition of Chinese existential sentences by English speakers. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 10(2), 127–145.Google Scholar
White, L. (1987). Markedness and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 91, 261–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Y. (2002). The syntactic development of school-age Chinese-speaking children learning English. IRAL, 401, 235–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, L. (2014). Topic prominence. In S.-Y. Wang & C. Sun (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics (pp. 393–403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, L., & Langendoen, T. (1985). Topic structures in Chinese. Language, 611, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, L. (2008). Topic prominence in typological interlanguage development of Chinese students’ English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Shanghai Foreign Studies University.Google Scholar
Yang, L., & Li, S. (2012). Topic prominence in typological interlanguage development of Chinese students’ English. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 7(4), 126–141.Google Scholar
Yang, L., Yu, S., & Wang, J. (2003). Typological error analysis on interlanguage data. Teaching English in China, 9(3), 48–52.Google Scholar
Yip, V. (1995a). Interlanguage and learnability from Chinese to English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995b). Interlanguage and typology: The case of topic-prominence. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker & M. S. Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage (pp. 17–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, B. (1997). Asymmetry of null subjects and null objects in Chinese speakers’ L2 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 191, 467–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, A. L., & Su, X. J. (2002). Topic-prominence structures and interlanguage. Journal of Foreign Languages, 41, 30–37.Google Scholar
Zhu, D. X. (1985). Yufu Dawen [Grammar: questions and answers]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshu Guan.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Jiang, Shan & Huiping Zhang
2022. The features and factors in the acquisition of English existential constructions at the syntax–pragmatics interface by Chinese learners. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Gao, Bei & Balakrishnan Nagaraj
2021. [Retracted] Analysis of the Needs of English‐Chinese Translation Courses and Research on Teaching Strategies under the Background of Wireless Communication and Big Data. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2021:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.