Article published in:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 1:1 (2018) ► pp. 141165

Full-text

The effects of transliterations, thematic organization, and working memory on adult L2 vocabulary learning
References

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G.
(1991) Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bassetti, B.
(2008) Orthographic input and second language phonology. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 191–206). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, W. F., & Nakamura, G. V.
(1984) The nature and functions of schemas. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report, no. 325.Google Scholar
[ p. 162 ]
Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
(2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, T. H.
(2003, July). The effects of semantic and thematic grouping on learning efficiency and retention of the L2 vocabulary. Tokyo, Japan: Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Clauson, G.
(2002) Studies in Turkic and Mongolic linguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center
(2005) Iraqi basic language survival guide. Presidio of Monterey, CA.Google Scholar
Degani, T., & Tokowicz, N.
(2010) Ambiguous words are harder to learn. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 299–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Degani, T., Tseng, A. M., & Tokowicz, N.
(2014) Together or apart? Learning of ambiguous words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 749–765. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elgort, I.
(2011) Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 61, 367–413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W.
(1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, M., & Nicol, J.
(2003) Semantic category effects in second language word learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 369–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Folse, K. S.
(2004) Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., & Cheng, H. -W.
(2016) The influence of the Pinyin and Zhuyin writing systems on the acquisition of Mandarin word forms by native English speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 (785). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu, C.
(2008) Use orthography in L2 auditory word learning: Who benefits? Reading and Writing, 21, 823–841. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M.
(2012) Cognitive mechanisms of word learning in bilingual and monolingual adults: The role of phonological memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 470–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E.
(1994) Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
(2013) lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R package version 2.0–3. 2013. Available from: http://​CRAN​.R–project​.org​/package​=lmerTest
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F.
(2014) Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J.
(1977) Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 163 ]
Nelson, J. R., Balass, M., & Perfetti, C. A.
(2005) Differences between written and spoken input in learning new words. Written Language & Literacy, 8, 25–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, M. S.
(2015) Orthographic input and the acquisition of second language phonology: A review. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 40(3), 389–401.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. & Hart, L.
(2002) The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 67–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Powell, M. J. D.
(June 2009) The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Cambridge University. DAMTP 2009/NA06. Retrieved 2014-02-14.Google Scholar
Psychological Software Tools, Inc.
(2000) E-Prime [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Roediger, III, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D.
(2006) The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
RStudio Team
(2016) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA. http://​www​.rstudio​.com/.
Stroop, J. R.
(1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tinkham, T.
(1997) The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. Second Language Research, 13, 138–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tokowicz, N., Michael, E. B., & Kroll, J. F.
(2004) The roles of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 255–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W.
(1989) Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D.
(1996) The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Experimental Psychology, 49A, 51–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Rice, Caitlin A. & Natasha Tokowicz
2020. A REVIEW OF LABORATORY STUDIES OF ADULT SECOND LANGUAGE VOCABULARY TRAINING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:2  pp. 439 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.