Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 1:1 (2018) ► pp.106–140

Early and late learners decompose inflected nouns, but can they tell which ones are inflected correctly?

| University of Maryland, College Park
| University of Pittsburgh | National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation
| University of Maryland, College Park

An auditory lexical decision task tests morphological decomposition and sensitivity to violations in inflection in late second language learners, early learners (heritage speakers), and native speakers of Russian. Two datasets compared reaction times and error rates to real Russian inflected nouns and nonce nouns. Two parameters of real nouns were manipulated: case (the nominative, or the oblique case), and inflection (overt or zero). Nonce nouns had (a) real stems and inflections combined in an illegal way (lemoning), and (b) inflected nonce stems (lemosing). Results suggest that heritage and late learners process inflectional morphology; however, their processing of inflected words is unreliable: they are willing to accept words with incongruent inflections. While no major differences were found in the processing patterns of early and late learners, a developmental trajectory was observed in both groups of learners: their sensitivity to violations in inflection improved with proficiency.

Keywords: heritage speakers, second language learners, morphology, lexical access, inflection, decomposition, second language processing, nonnative proficiency, lexical decision task, auditory word recognition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Nonnative processing of Russian nominal inflection
    • 1.2Processing nonwords and nonnative sensitivity to morphological violations
  • 2.The present study
    • 2.1Method
      • 2.1.1Participants
      • 2.1.2Materials
      • 2.1.3Procedure
    • 2.2Results
      • 2.2.1Dataset 1: Real words: Case and inflection
        • Error rate
        • Reaction times
        • Summary
      • 2.2.2Dataset 2: Real and nonce nouns
        • Dataset 2.1: 1st declension nouns
          • Error rate
          • Reaction times
        • Dataset 2.2: 2nd declension nouns
          • Error rate
          • Reaction time
          • Summary
  • 3.Discussion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 7 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.17021.gor
References
Akaike, H.
(1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 191, 716–723. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R.
(1997) Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a dual parallel route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 371, 94–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipović Đurđević, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M.
(2011) An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 1181, 438–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. [URL]
Butterworth, B.
(1983) Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Development, writing and other language processes (pp. 257–294). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C.
(1988) Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 281, 297–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Balkhair, L., Schutter, J-S., & Cunnings, I.
(2013) The time course of morphological processing in a second language. Second Language Research, 291, 7–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R.
(2010) Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 601, 21–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., Besner, D., Jonasson, J. T., & Davelaar, E.
(1979) Phonological encoding in the lexical decision task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 311, 489–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coughlin, C. E., & Tremblay, A.
(2013) Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 341, 647–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Morphological decomposition in native and non-native French speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 181, 524–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diependaele, K., Lemhöfer, K., & Brysbaert, M.
(2013) The word frequency effect in first- and second-language word recognition: A lexical entrenchment account. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 661, 843–863. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estivalet, G. L., & Meunier, F. E.
(2015) Decomposability and mental representation of French verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 91, Article 4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fang, Y.
(2011) Asymptotic equivalence between cross-validations and Akaike information criteria in mixed-effects models. Journal of Data Science, 91, 15–21.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Kostić, A., Basnight-Brown, D. M., Filipović Đurđević, D., & Pastizzo, M. J.
(2010) Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 131, 119–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foote, R.
(2015) The storage and processing of morphologically complex words in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. FirstView Article. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C.
(2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 35(1), 116–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gor, K.
(2015) Phonology and morphology in lexical processing. In J. W. Schwieter (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingual processing (pp. 173–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gor, K., Chrabaszcz, A., & Cook, S.
(2017a) Processing of nonnative inflected words: Beyond affix stripping. Journal of Memory and Language, 931, 315–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b) A case for agreement: Processing of case inflection by early and late learners. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gor, K., & Cook, S.
(2010) Non-native processing of verbal morphology: In search of regularity. Language Learning, 601, 88–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gor, K., & Jackson, S.
(2013) Morphological decomposition and lexical access in a native and second language: A nesting doll effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 281, 1065–1091. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gor, K., Kireev, M., Chrabaszcz, A., & Medvedev, S.
(2017c) An fMRI study of morphological decomposition in the recognition of case-inflected nouns: Dissociation of inflection and case. Paper presented at the 10th International Morphological Processing Conference, SISSA, Trieste, Italy, June 22-24, 2017.
Hopp, H.
(2010) Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between nonnative and native speakers. Lingua, 1201, 901–931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 291, 33–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacob, G., & Kırkıcı, B.
(2016) The processing of morphologically complex words in a specific speaker group. The Mental Lexicon, 111, 308–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N., Hu, G., Chrabaszcz, A., & Ye, L.
(2015) The activation of grammaticalized meaning in L2 processing: Toward an explanation of the morphological congruency effect. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(1), 81–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirkici, B., & Clahsen, H.
(2013) Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 161, 776–791. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P., & Christensen, R.
(2015) lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-25. [URL]
Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M.
(2003) How word frequency affects morphological processing in monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 61, 213–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, M., Vorobyev, V., Hugdahl, K., Tuokkola, T., & Laine, M.
(2006) Neural correlates of morphological decomposition in a morphologically rich language: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 981, 182–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, M., Vorobyev, V., Soveri, A., Hugdahl, K., Tuokkola, T., & Laine, M.
(2009) Language-specific activations in the brain: Evidence from inflectional processing in bilinguals. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 221, 495–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lukatela, G., Gligorijevic, B., Kostić, A., & Turvey, M. T.
(1980) Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory and Cognition, 81, 415–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, A.
(2013) No escape from morphemes in morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(7), 905–916. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Foote, R.
(2014) Age of acquisition interactions in bilingual lexical access: A study of the weaker language of L2 learners and heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 181, 274–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S.
(2008) Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 581, 503–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neubauer, K., & Clahsen, H.
(2009) Decomposition of inflected words in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 311, 403–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portin, M., Lehtonen, M., Harrer, G., Wande, E., Niemi, J., & Laine, M.
(2008) L1 effects on the processing of inflected nouns in L2. Acta Psychologica, 1281, 452–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portin, M., Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M.
(2007) Processing of inflected nouns in late bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 281, 135–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Scontras, G., Fuchs, Z., & Polinsky, M.
(2015) Heritage language and linguistic theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.1545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharoff, S.
(2001) The frequency dictionary for Russian. Available at [URL]> (4 December 2007).
(2006) Methods and tools for development of the Russian Reference Corpus. Language and Computers, 561, 167–180.Google Scholar
Slioussar, N., & Cherepovskaia, N.
(2014) Case errors in processing: Evidence from Russian. In Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The First Hamilton Meeting 2013 (pp. 319–338). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Slioussar, N., Stetsenko, A., & Matyushkina, T.
(2015) Producing case errors in Russian. In Y. Oseki, M. Esipova, & S. Harves (Eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The First New York Meeting 2015. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R.
(1979) Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 181, 399–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taft, M.
(1979) Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 71, 263–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 571, 745–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Cross-morphemic transposed letter effects argue against a single decompositional pathway. Paper presented at the 10th International Morphological Processing Conference, SISSA, Trieste, Italy, June 22–24, 2017.
Tockowitz, N., & MacWhinney, B.
(2005) Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to viola-tions in second language grammar: An event related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 173–204.Google Scholar
Vaida, F., & Blanchard, S.
(2005) Conditional Akaike information for mixed-effects models. Biometrika, 921, 351–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voga, М., Anastassiadis-Symeonidis, А., & Giraudo, H.
(2014) Does morphology play a role in L2 processing? Two masked priming experiments with Greek speakers of ESL. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 371, 338–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, M. J., Sibley, D. E., Balota, D. A., Ratcliff, R., & Rueckl, J.
(2015) Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 411, 597–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Chrabaszcz, Anna, Nina Ladinskaya & Anastasiya Lopukhina
2023. Acquisition of Russian noun case by bilingual children: lexical cues to case assignment in real and novel words. Language Acquisition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Durand López, Ezequiel M.
2021. Morphological processing and individual frequency effects in L1 and L2 Spanish. Lingua 257 ► pp. 103093 ff. DOI logo
Jegerski, Jill & Irina A. Sekerina
2021. The Psycholinguistics of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Research Approaches to Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 373 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.