Complications in the L2 acquisition of the simple spatial prepositions in and on
Crosslinguistic differences in image schema and family resemblance
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methods
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Materials
- 2.3Procedure
- 3.Results
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusions
-
References
References (33)
Boers, F.
(
2013)
Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary: Assessment and integration.
Language Teaching, 46(2), 208–224.
Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M.
(
1998)
A cognitive semantic approach to teaching prepositions.
ELT Journal, 52(3), 197–204.
Chilton, P.
(
2014)
Language, space, and mind: The conceptual geometry of linguistic meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Correa-Beningfield, M., Kristiansen, G., Navarro-Ferrando, I., & Vandeloise, C.
(
2005)
Image schemas vs. “complex primitives” in cross-cultural spatial cognition. In
B. Hampe &
J. E. Grady (Eds.),
From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 343–376). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cronbach, L. J.
(
1977)
Educational psychology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Deane, P. D.
(
2005)
Multimodal spatial representation: On the semantic unity of over
. In
B. Hampe &
J. E. Grady (Eds.),
From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 235–282). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dodge, E., & Lakoff, G.
(
2005)
Image schemas: From linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In
B. Hampe &
J. E. Grady (Eds.),
From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 57–91). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Evans, V., & Tyler, A.
(
2005)
Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The English prepositions of verticality.
Rev. Brasileira de Linguistica Applicada, 5(2), 11–42.
Feist, M. I., & Gentner, D.
(
2012)
Multiple influences on the use of English spatial prepositions: The case of “in” and “on”. In
C. Boonthum-Denecke,
P. M. McCarthy, &
T. A. Lamkin (Eds.),
Cross-disciplinary advances in applied natural language processing: Issues and approaches (pp. 305–323). Hersey, PA: IGI Global.
Garrod, S., Ferrier, G., & Campbell, S.
(
1999)
In and on: Investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions.
Cognition, 72(2), 167–189.
Gentner, D., & Bowerman, M.
(
2009)
Why some spatial semantic categories are harder to learn than others: The typological prevalence hypothesis. In
J. Guo,
E. Lieven,
S. Ervin-Tripp,
N. Budwig,
S. Özçaliskan, &
K. Nakamura (Eds.),
Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 465–480). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
Grady, J. E.
(
2005)
Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition. In
B. Hampe &
J. E. Grady (Eds.),
From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 35–55). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hart, C.
(
2014)
Discourse, grammar and ideology: Functional and cognitive perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Johnson, M.
(
1987)
The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Johnson, M.
(
2005)
The philosophical significance of image schemas. In
B. Hampe &
J. E. Grady (Eds.),
From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 15–33). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kosslyn, S. M.
(
1980)
Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lakoff, G.
(
1987)
Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Landau, B., & Jackendoff, R.
(
1993) “
What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition.
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(2), 217–265.
Langacker, R. W.
(
1991)
Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lindstromberg, S.
(
1996)
Prepositions: Meaning and method.
ELT Journal, 50(3), 225–236.
Machin, D.
(
2009)
Multimodality and theories of the visual. In
C. Jewitt (Ed.),
Handbook of multimodality (pp. 181–190). London: Sage.
Mandler, J. M., & Pagan-Canovas, C.
(
2014)
On defining image schemas.
Language and Cognition, 6(4), 510–523.
McDonough, L., Choi, S., & Mandler, J. M.
(
2003)
Understanding spatial relations: Flexible infants, lexical adults.
Cognitive Psychology, 46(3), 229–259.
Odlin, T.
(
2005)
Crosslinguistic influence and conceptual transfer: What are the concepts? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 251, 3–25.
Pinker, S.
(
1999)
Words and rules: The ingredients of language. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Quirk, R., & Greenbaum, S.
(
1973)
A university grammar of English. London: Longman.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B.
(
1975)
Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.
Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605.
Shintani, M., Mori, K., & Ohmori, T.
(
2016)
Image schema-based instruction in English grammar. In
P. Clements,
A. Krause, &
H. Brown (Eds.),
Focus on the learner (pp. 285–296). Tokyo: JALT.
Taferner, R. & Yamada, J.
Talmy, L.
(
2000)
Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Talmy, L.
(
2005)
The fundamental system of spatial schemas in language. In
B. Hampe &
J. E. Grady (Eds.),
From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 199–234). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tyler, A., & Evans, V.
(
2003)
Lexical meaning and experience: The semantics of English prepositions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zlatev, J.
(
2005)
What’s in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language. In
B. Hampe &
J. E. Grady (Eds.),
From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 314–341). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Taferner, Robert Horst & Jun Yamada
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.