Article published in:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 3:1 (2020) ► pp. 130
References

References

Baddeley, A.
(1986) Working memory. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D., & Waters, G.
(2013) Memory mechanisms supporting syntactic comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(2), 243–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S.
(1999) Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 77–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K.
(2006) Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.Google Scholar
Coady, J.
(1993) Research on ESL/EFL vocabulary acquisition: Putting it in context. Second Language Reading and Vocabulary Learning, 3, 3–23.Google Scholar
Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W.
(2005) Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and users guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, E.
(2008) Questions with long-distance dependencies: A usage-based perspective. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3), 391–425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, E., Rowland, C., & Theakston, A.
(2009) The acquisition of questions with long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3), 571–597. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A.
(1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M.
(1996) Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Pinar, P.
(2010) Effects of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-gaps by Chinese-English second language speakers. Second Language Research, 26(4), 443–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R.
(1999) Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 309–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P.
(2006) Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(32), 12203–12208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Fine, A. B., Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H.
(2016) Reading span task performance, linguistic experience, and the processing of unexpected syntactic events. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(3), 413–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H.
(2012) Individual differences in sentence processing. In M. Spivey, M. Joanisse, & K. McRae (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 353–364). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Felser, C., & Roberts, L.
(2007) Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23(1), 9–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Felser, C., Roberts, L., Marinis, T., & Gross, R.
(2003) The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of english. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), 453–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D.
(1978) The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6(4), 291–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A.
(2004) The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 136–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Comparison of four scoring methods for the reading span test. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 581–590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D.
(2014) Working memory and language. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, E.
(1998) Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Havik, E., Roberts, L., Van Hout, R., Schreuder, R., & Haverkort, M.
(2009) Processing subject-object ambiguities in the L2: A self-paced reading study with German L2 learners of Dutch. Language Learning, 59(1), 73–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2015) Individual differences in the second language processing of object–subject ambiguities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 129–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iacobucci, D., Schneider, M. J., Popovich, D. L., & Bakamitsos, G. A.
(2016) Mean centering helps alleviate “micro” but not “macro” multicollinearity. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1308–1317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(2007) A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research, 1146, 2–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. N., & Van Hell, J. G.
(2011) The effects of L2 proficiency level on the processing of wh-questions among Dutch second language speakers of English. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49(3), 195–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. F., & Tily, H.
(2011) On language utility: Processing complexity and communicative efficiency. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(3), 323–335.Google Scholar
Juffs, A.
(2004) Representation, processing and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102(2), 199–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21(2), 121–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Processing reduced relative vs. main verb ambiguity in English as a second language: a replication study with working memory. In S. M. R. Slabakova & P. Prevost (Eds.), Inquiries in Linguistic Development in Honor of Lydia White (pp. 213–232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M.
(1995) Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 483–516. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 46(2), 283–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2), 137–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A.
(1992) A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W.
(2004) The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, E.
(2013) The role of verbal working memory in children’s sentence comprehension: A critical review. Topics in Language Disorders, 33(3), 208–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. H., & Christianson, K.
(2017) Working memory effects on L1 and L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses by Korean L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 33(3), 365–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Bruun Brockhoff, P., & Haubo Bojesen Christensen, R.
(2017) lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models [Computer software manual].Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M.
(2012) Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of english. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A.
(2006) Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 447–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., … Doughty, C. J.
(2013) Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F.
(2014) Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–883. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, M. C.
(2015) The emergence of language comprehension. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 81–92). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H.
(2002) Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109(1), 35–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(2012) The logic of the unified model. In Susan M. Gass & Alison Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 211–227). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mathot, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J.
(2012) Opensesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & Perfetti, C. A.
(1983) The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: A replication. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15(1), 3–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ministerium für Schule und Weiterbildung des Landes Nordrhein-Westphalen
(2014) Kernlehrplan für die Sekundarstufe ii Gymnasium in Nordrhein-Westphalen: Englisch. Retrieved from: https://​www​.schulentwicklung​.nrw​.de​/lehrplaene​/upload​/klpSII​/e​/KLPGOStEnglisch​.pdf> (9 June 2018).
Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H.
(2012) Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study. Language Learning, 62(1), 302–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ouellette, G. P.
(2006) What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, B. R., Gao, X., Noh, S. R., Anderson, C. J., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L.
(2012) The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: Evidence for efficiency and reserve. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19(1–2), 122–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Vidal, C.
(2014) Language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (AILA Applied Linguistics Series 13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Wlotko, E. W., & Hart, L. A.
(2005) Word learning and individual differences in word learning reflected in event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1281–1292.Google Scholar
R Core Team
(2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Roberts, L.
(2012) Individual differences in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 62(s2), 172–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Sentence processing in bilinguals. In R. P. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence processing (pp. 233–258). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, L., & Felser, C.
(2011) Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(2), 299–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2001) Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17(4), 368–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodrıguez, G. A.
(2008) Second language sentence processing: Is it fundamentally different? (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Sharwood-Smith, M.
(2017) Working with working memory and language. Second Language Research, 33(3), 291–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shipley, W. C.
(1940) A self-administering scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. The Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 371–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(2002) Theorizing and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F.
(1989) Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stone, J. M., & Towse, J.
(2015) A working memory test battery: Java-based collection of seven working memory tasks. Journal of Open Research Software, 3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M.
(1994) Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W.
(1989) Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Van Leeuwe, J.
(2008) Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22(3), 407–423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Von Bastian, C. C., Locher, A., & Ruflin, M.
(2013) Tatool: A java-based open-source programming framework for psychological studies. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 108–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D.
(1996a) The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of just and carpenter (1992). Psychological Review, 103(4), 761–772. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996b) The Measurement of Verbal Working Memory Capacity and Its Relation to Reading Comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49(1), 51–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 550–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C.
(2009) Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58(2), 250–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z.
(2016) Working memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated approach. Bristol: Multilingual matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z., Mota, M. B., & McNeill, A.
(2015) Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N.
(2012) Working memory and SLA. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zhou, H., Rossi, S., & Chen, B.
(2017) Effects of working memory capacity and tasks in processing L2 complex sentence: evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 595. CrossrefGoogle Scholar