Article published in:
Aptitude-treatment interaction in second language learning
Edited by Robert M. DeKeyser
[Journal of Second Language Studies 2:2] 2019
► pp. 169196
Anderson, J. R.
(2015) Cognitive psychology and its implications (8th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Bender, R., & Lange, S.
(2001) Adjusting for multiple testing – when and how? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 541, 343–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y.
(1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 289–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bird, S.
(2010) Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 311, 635–650. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, K. C., & Shuell, T. J.
(1981) Effects of massed and distributed practice on the learning and retention of second-language vocabulary. The Journal of Educational Research, 741, 245–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. K., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Kang, S. H. K., & Pashler, H.
(2012) Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 241, 369–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B.
(1981) Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83–118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D.
(2006) Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 1321, 354–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H.
(2008) Spacing effects in learning a temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 191, 1095–1102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E.
(1977) Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York, NY: Irvington.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M.
(2012) Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in sla. Language Learning, 621, 189–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M., & Koeth, J.
(2010) Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 21, pp. 395–406). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S.
(2015) The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. J.
(2019) Cognitive language aptitude. Language Learning, 691, 101–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R.
(1997) Morphology and longer distance dependencies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 191, 145–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R.
(2005) Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 91, 147–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Field, A.
(2009) Discovering statistics using SPPS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C.
(2003) DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 351, 116–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goo, J.
(2012) Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 341, 445–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granena, G.
(2013) Cognitive aptitudes for L2 learning and the llama language aptitude test. In G. Granena, & Long, M. H. (Ed.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 105–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Cognitive aptitudes for implicit and explicit learning and information-processing styles: An individual differences study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 371, 577–600. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kempe, V., & Brooks, P. J.
(2008) Second language learning of complex inflectional systems. Language Learning, 581, 703–746. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. W., Ritter, F. E., & Koubek, R. J.
(2013) An integrated theory for improved skill acquisition and retention in the three stages of learning. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 141, 22–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, S.
(2013) The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 971, 634–654. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 361, 385–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., … Doughty, C. J.
(2013) Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 631, 530–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F.
(2014) Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 211, 861–883. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meara, P. M.
(2005) Llama language aptitude tests: The manual. Swansea, UK: Lognostics. Retrieved from http://​www​.lognostics​.co​.uk​/tools​/llama​/llama​_manual​.pdf
Miles, S. W.
(2014) Spaced vs. massed distribution instruction for L2 grammar learning. System, 421, 412–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., Brill-Schuetz, K. A., Carpenter, H., & Wong, P. C. M.
(2014) Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 171, 56–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakata, T.
(2015) Effects of expanding and equal spacing on second language vocabulary learning: Does gradually increasing spacing increase vocabulary learning? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 371, 677–711. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(1997) Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult sla. Language Learning, 471, 45–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Aptitudes, abilities, contexts, and practice. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 256–286). New York, NY: Cambridge Universtiy Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J.
(2015) Learning second language syntax under massed and distributed conditions. TESOL Quarterly, 491, 857–866. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C., Lin, H.-J., Lado, B., Stafford, C. A., & Bowden, H. W.
(2016) One size fits all? Learning conditions and working memory capacity in ab initio language development. Applied Linguistics, 371, 669–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M.
(1993) Relationships among second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude, and intelligence: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Learning, 431, 313–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C.
(2016) Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 381, 607–646. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, R., & Huang, H. Y.
(2018) Learning vocabulary through assisted repeated reading: How much time should there be between repetitions of the same text? TESOL Quarterly, 521, 971–994. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y.
(2007) The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on esl learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 411, 255–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Theorising and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In G. Granena, D. O. Jackson, & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 17–40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snow, R. E.
(1987) Aptitude complexes. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction (pp. 13–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y.
(2017) The optimal distribution of practice for the acquisition of L2 morphology: A conceptual replication and extension. Language Learning, 671, 512–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. M.
(2017a) Effects of distributed practice on the proceduralization of morphology. Language Teaching Research, 211, 166–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017b) Exploratory research on L2 practice distribution: An aptitude x treatment interaction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 381, 27–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S.
(2007) Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Toppino, T. C., & Gerbier, E.
(2014) About practice: Repetition, spacing, and abstraction. The Psychology of Learning & Motivation, 601, 113–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T.
(2015) The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiologically-motivated theory of first and second language. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 135–158). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T., & Lovelett, J. T.
(2018) Implications of the declarative/procedural model for improving second language learning: The role of memory enhancement techniques. Second Language Research, 341, 39–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W.
(2005) An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 371, 498–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vatz, K., Tare, M., Jackson, S., & Doughty, C.
(2013) Aptitude-treatment interaction studies in second language acquisition: Findings and methodology. In G. Granena & M. H. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 273–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wesche, M.
(1981) Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learning problems. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 119–154). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N.
(2016) Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 381, 239–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y.
(2013) Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 341, 344–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Kim, Su Kyung & Stuart Webb
2022. The Effects of Spaced Practice on Second Language Learning: A Meta‐Analysis. Language Learning 72:1  pp. 269 ff. Crossref logo
Serfaty, Jonathan & Raquel Serrano
2022. Lag effects in grammar learning: A desirable difficulties perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Serrano, Raquel & Hsiao-yun Huang
2021. Time distribution and intentional vocabulary learning through repeated reading: a partial replication and extension. Language Awareness  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Suzuki, Yuichi
2021. Individual differences in memory predict changes in breakdown and repair fluency but not speed fluency: A short-term fluency training intervention study. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:4  pp. 969 ff. Crossref logo
Suzuki, Yuichi & Keiko Hanzawa
2021. MASSED TASK REPETITION IS A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD FOR FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT. Studies in Second Language Acquisition  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
2019. Optimizing Second Language Practice in the Classroom: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology. The Modern Language Journal Crossref logo
Ton, Nu Linh Thoai
2020. Bridging Second Language Acquisition Research and English Language Teaching: An Interview with Robert DeKeyser. RELC Journal 51:2  pp. 324 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.