Article published in:
Aptitude-treatment interaction in second language learning
Edited by Robert M. DeKeyser
[Journal of Second Language Studies 2:2] 2019
► pp. 233–257

The associations between individual differences in working memory and the effectiveness of immediate and delayed corrective feedback

| The University of Auckland
| Florida State University | Zhengzhou University
This paper reports on a study investigating the role of working memory in predicting L2 development under immediate and delayed corrective feedback (CF) conditions. A total of 106 seventh-grade EFL learners were assigned to three groups: Immediate CF, Delayed CF, and Task Only. Each group underwent three treatment sessions during which they performed six focused communicative tasks – two in each session – involving the use of the English past tense. The Immediate CF group received feedback on their erroneous use of the target structure during their task performance in Session 1; the Delayed CF group did not receive feedback until the final treatment session; and the Task Only group performed the communicative tasks without receiving any feedback. Treatment effects were measured through a grammaticality judgement test and an elicited imitation test. Working memory was measured by means of an operation span test. The results revealed that working memory was a significant predictor only of the effects of delayed CF, not those of immediate CF or task only. The findings suggest that delayed CF may have imposed a heavier processing burden on the learners’ working memory due to the need to match the delayed feedback with the errors in their procedural knowledge manifested in previous sessions. Based on the results of this and other empirical studies, the authors argue for the superiority of immediate feedback over delayed feedback.
Keywords: corrective feedback, feedback timing, immediate and delayed feedback, working memory, form-focused instruction, child language acquisition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Working memory and its mediating effects on CF
    • 2.2CF timing
      • 2.2.1The concept of CF timing
      • 2.2.2Theoretical perspectives of CF timing
      • 2.2.3Empirical findings of the timing effects of feedback
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Procedure
    • 3.3Target structure
    • 3.4Treatment tasks
      • 3.4.1Task procedure
      • 3.4.2Task texts
    • 3.5Feedback treatment
    • 3.6Measurements
      • 3.6.1Working memory test
      • 3.6.2Language achievement tests
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Descriptive statistics
    • 4.2Inferential statistics
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1The lack of working memory effects in Task Only
    • 5.2Differential roles of working memory under immediate and delayed CF conditions
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 08 October 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19002.fu
References
Anderson, D., Magill, R., & Sekiya, H.
(2001) Motor learning as a function of KR schedule and characteristics of task-intrinsic feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33(1), 59–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D., Magill, R., Sekiya, H., & Ryan, G.
(2005) Support for an explanation of the guidance effect in motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37(3), 231–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arroyo, D. C., & Yilmaz, Y.
(2018) An open for replication study: The role of feedback timing in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Learning, 68(4), 942–972. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A.
(2000) The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G.
(1974) Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 81, pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Case, R., Kurland, M., & Goldberg, J.
(1982) Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 331, 386–404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conlin, J., Gathercole, S., & Adams, J.
(2005) Children’s working memory: Investigating performance limitations in complex span tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90(4), 303–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conway, A., Kane, M., Bunting, M., Hambrick, D., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R.
(2005) Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(2007) Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62(Suppl. 2), 189–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C., & Varela, E.
(1998) Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(02), 141–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 339–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erlam, R., & Loewen, S.
(2010) Implicit and explicit recasts in L2 oral French interaction. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(6), 887–916. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S., Pickering, S., Knight, C., & Stegmann, Z.
(2004) Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from national curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goo, J.
(2012) Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., & Han, Z.
(2007) Recasts in communicative EFL classes: Do teacher intent and learner interpretations overlap? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 269–297). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., Payant, C., & Pearson, P.
(2015) The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 371, 549–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S.
(1981) A functional reference grammar of Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, S.
(2013a) The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. Modern Language Journal, 971, 634–654. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013b) The differential roles of language analytic ability and working memory in mediating the effects of two types of feedback on the acquisition of an opaque linguistic structure. In C. Sanz & B. Lado (Eds.), Individual differences, L2 development & language program administration: From theory to application (pp. 32–52). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Li, S., Zhu, Y., & Ellis, R.
(2016) The effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic structure. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 276–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, S.
(2017) The effects of cognitive aptitudes on the process and product of L2 interaction. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors (pp. 41–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., & Fu, M.
(2018) Strategic and unpressured within-task planning and their associations with working memory. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 230–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y.
(2019) The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1–30.Google Scholar
Linck, J., Osthus, P., Koeth, J., & Bunting, M.
(2014) Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 211, 861–883. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fuji, A., & Tatsumi, T.
(2002) Individual differences in working memory, noticing of feedback, and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Sachs, R.
(2012) Older learners in SLA research: A first look at working memory, feedback, and L2 development. Language Learning, 621, 704–740. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mifka-Profozic, N.
(2013) The effectiveness of corrective feedback and the role of individual differences in language learning. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, P.
(2014) Delayed Versus Immediate Corrective Feedback on Orally Produced Passive Errors in English (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Révész, A.
(2012) Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 621, 93–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roche, K., & Chainay, H.
(2013) Visually guided grasping of common objects: Effects of priming. Visual Cognition, 21(8), 1010–1032. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salmoni, A., Schmidt, R., & Walter, C.
(1984) Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 355–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C., Lin, H., Lado, B., Stafford, C., & Bowden, H.
(2014) One size fits all? Learning conditions and working memory capacity in ab initio language development. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 669–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R., Young, D., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D.
(1989) Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(2), 352–359.Google Scholar
Schooler, L., & Anderson, J.
(2008) The disruptive potential of immediate feedback. Retrieved from http://​repository​.emu​.edu​/cgi​/viewcontent​.cgi​?article​=1079​&context​=psychology
Skinner, B.
(1954) The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86–97.Google Scholar
Spada, N., Shiu, J., & Tomita, Y.
(2015) Validating an elicited imitation task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Comparisons with other validation studies. Language Learning, 65(3), 723–751. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, E., Kofler, M., Soto, E., Schaefer, H., & Sarver, D.
(2018) Assessing working memory in children with ADHD: Minor administration and scoring changes may improve digit span backward’s construct validity. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 721, 166–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y., & Lyster, R.
(2010) Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(02), 235–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y.
(2013) Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 341, 344–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y.
(2015) The effects of explicit and implicit recasts on the acquisition of two grammatical structures and the mediating role of working memory (Unpublished PhD dissertation). The University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Mohammad Javad Ahmadian & Michael H. Long
2021.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, Crossref logo
Gries, Stefan Th.
2021. What do (most of) our dispersion measures measure (most)? Dispersion?. Journal of Second Language Studies Crossref logo
Lee, Andrew H.
2021. The effects of proactive form-focused instruction and individual differences on second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882110510 ff. Crossref logo
Révész, Andrea
2021.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 605 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.