Article published in:
Aptitude-treatment interaction in second language learning
Edited by Robert M. DeKeyser
[Journal of Second Language Studies 2:2] 2019
► pp. 281–316

Working memory and planning time as predictors of fluency and accuracy

| VOXY
| University of Maryland, College Park

Working memory, which accounts for the ability to process information in the face of interference, is critical to second language acquisition (SLA) and use. The interaction of working memory capacity (WMC) with specific pedagogical interventions is a logical place for empirical SLA research, both to examine the cognitive processes underpinning second language performance and to identify instructional treatments that may serve learners differently based on their WMC. This study considers WMC along with two different types of pre-task planning time (guided and unguided) as predictors of the attempted accuracy and fluency of learners’ discourse. Seventy-two intermediate ESL students from seven classes at a community college participated by completing two different working memory span tasks, as well as two different “There-and-Then” oral story-telling tasks. The treatment condition of the story-telling tasks was manipulated so that learners’ performance could be considered in terms of provision of pre-task planning (+/− planning), type of planning (guided vs. unguided), and order of planning (planning first or planning second). Task order had a clear effect on learners’ production, regardless of the provision of planning time. Guided planning time promoted a focus on attempted accuracy and unguided planning time fostered fluency. Finally, this study indicates that task conditions can affect high- and low-WMC learners in different ways: the former are more likely to comply with complex story-telling instructions, requiring them to focus on grammatical form at the expense of fluency, whereas the latter are less likely to comply with the same instructions.

Keywords: tasks, ESL, planning, working memory capacity, aptitude
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Task demands, cognition, and L2 performance
    • 1.2Working memory and SLA
    • 1.3Planning and SLA
    • 1.4The present study
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Instruments
    • 2.3Procedures
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Descriptive statistics and initial analyses of variables
    • 3.2Planning order/conditions and WMC: Initial analyses
    • 3.3The order of the provision of planning time
      • 3.3.1Descriptive statistics split by planning order
      • 3.3.2Between-groups data analysis without the influence of task repetition
      • 3.3.3Repeated measures analyses: No planning first
      • 3.3.4Repeated measures analyses for participants who began with planning time
    • 3.4Summary of relationship among variables and planning conditions
    • 3.5Working memory
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1The influence of task order on learner fluency
    • 4.2Guided and unguided planning as predictors of fluency
    • 4.3Guided and unguided planning as predictors of attempted accuracy
    • 4.4WMC and learner production
    • 4.5Synthesis of results by planning condition and WMC
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 08 October 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19004.bro
References
Atkins, S. M., Harbison, J. I., Bunting, M. F., Teubner-Rhodes, S., & Dougherty, M. R.
(2009) Measuring working memory with automated block span and automated letter-number sequencing. Poster presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA. DOI logo
Baddeley, A. & Hitch, G.
(1974) Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 81, pp. 47–90). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W.
(2005) Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N.
(1999) An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crookes, G.
(1989) Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 111, 367–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P.
(1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 191, 450–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M. & Green, I.
(1986) Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(1), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M.
(2009) Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In. M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 119–138). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. & Koeth, J.
(2011) Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 21, pp. 395–406). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W.
(1999) Individual differences in WMC and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. W.
(2010) Role of working memory capacity in cognitive control. Current Anthropology, 51(s1), 17–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, R.
(2007a) The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning time and (+/− Here and Now): Effects on L2 oral production. In M. Garcia-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 44–68). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2007b) Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. IRAL, 451, 215–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, R., & Muñoz, C.
(2010) Differences in attainment and performance of a second language: The role of WMC. International Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 19–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guará-Tavares, M. G.
(2009) The relationship among pre-task planning, working memory capacity, and L2 speech performance: A pilot study. Linguagem & Ensino, 12(1), 165–194.Google Scholar
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M.
(1992) L2 WMC and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 141, 25–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M.
(2011) Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching: Reviews and Studies, 42(2), 137–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W.
(2001) A controlled-attention view of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1301, 169–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W.
(2007) Variation in WMC as variation in executive attention & control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 21–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kawauchi, C.
(2005) The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners with low and high intermediate proficiency. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 143–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A.
(2008) Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 261–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J. & Trebits, A.
(2011) Working memory capacity and narrative task performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 267–286). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F.
(2014) Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 211, 861–883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T.
(2002) Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback, and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.) Individual differences and instructed second language learning (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehnert, U.
(1998) The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 201, 52–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L.
(2008) Balancing communication and grammar in beginning‐level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12(1), 11‐37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielson, K.
(2014) Can planning time compensate for individual differences in working memory capacity? Language Teaching Research, 18(3), 272–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
(1999) Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 109–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, S.
(2010) The influence of pretask instructions and pretask planning on focus on form during Korean EFL task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 9–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. & Ross, B.
(2005) Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 proficiency development. Language Learning and Technology, 19(3), 35–54.Google Scholar
Payne, J. & Whitney, P.
(2002) Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 201, 7–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rai, M. K., Loschky, L. C., Harris, R. J., Peck, N. R. & Cook, L. G.
(2011) Effects of stress and working memory capacity on foreign language readers’ inferential processing during comprehension. Language Learning, Language Learning, 61(1), 187–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(1995a) Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45(2), 281–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995b) Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45(1), 99–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for investigating task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA. In P. Robinson. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005a) Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 251, 46–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005b) Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 431, 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Aptitudes, abilities, contexts, and practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language. Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 256–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sangarun, J.
(2005) The effects of focusing on meaning and form in strategic planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 111–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Theorising and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed second language learning (pp. 69–93). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, flueny, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. & P. Foster
(1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 491, 93–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. & Foster, P.
(2001) Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprenger, A. M., Atkins, S. M., Colflesh, G. J. H., Briner, T. L., Buchanan, J. B., Chavis, S. E., Chen, S., Iannuzzi, G. L., Kashtelyan, V., Dowling, E., Bolger, D. J., Bunting, M. F., & Dougherty, M. R.
in preparation). A four-dimensional video game for measuring cognitive ability.
Sunderman, G. & Kroll, J.
(2009) When study-abroad experience fails to deliver: The internal resources threshold effect. Applied Psycholinguistics, 301, 70–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, N. & Engle, R.
(2007) The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 1141, 104–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, G.
(1997) An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14(1), 85–106.Google Scholar
Williams, J.
(2011) Working memory and SLA. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 427–441). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R.
(2003) The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 241, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Mohammad Javad Ahmadian & Michael H. Long
2021. . In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Chen, Mo & Wenya Li
2022. The Influence of Form-Focused Instruction on the L2 Chinese Oral Production of Korean Native Speakers. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Johnson, Mark D & Mahmoud Abdi Tabari
2022. Task Planning and Oral L2 Production: A Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics 43:6 ► pp. 1143 ff. DOI logo
Rezaei, Amir & Antonella Valeo
2022. Investigating the impact of task complexity on uptake and noticing of corrective feedback recasts. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo
Révész, Andrea
2021. Methodological Approaches to Investigating Task-Based Language Teaching. In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 605 ff. DOI logo
Sadeghi, Michael & Mostafa Pourhaji
2021. The contributions of working memory and pre-task explicit instruction to L2 oral performance. System 96 ► pp. 102409 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Peijian Paul
2022. The Influence of Cognitive, Affective, and Sociocultural Individual Differences on L2 Chinese Speech Performance: A Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes Approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research DOI logo
Suzuki, Yuichi
2021. Individual differences in memory predict changes in breakdown and repair fluency but not speed fluency: A short-term fluency training intervention study. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:4 ► pp. 969 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.