Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 4:1 (2021) ► pp.65–95

Eye-tracking as a window into assembled phonology in native and non-native reading

| Southern Illinois University Carbondale
| University of Pittsburgh

The past 30 years of reading research has confirmed the importance of bottom-up processing. Rather than a psycholinguistic guessing game (Goodman, 1967), reading is dependent on rapid, accurate recognition of written forms. In fluent first language (L1) readers, this is seen in the automatic activation of a word’s phonological form, impacting lexical processing (Perfetti & Bell, 1991; Rayner, Sereno, Lesch & Pollatsek, 1995). Although the influence of phonological form is well established, less clear is the extent to which readers are sensitive to the possible pronunciations of a word (Lesch & Pollatsek, 1998), derived from the varying consistency of grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences (GPCs) (e.g., although ‘great’ has only one pronunciation, [ɡɹeɪt], the grapheme <ea> within it has multiple possible pronunciations: [i] in [plit] ‘pleat’, [ɛ] in [bɹɛθ] ‘breath’; Parkin, 1982). Further, little is known about non-native readers’ sensitivity to such characteristics. Non-native readers process text differently from L1 readers (Koda & Zehler, 2008; McBride-Chang, Bialystok, Chong & Li, 2004), with implications for understanding L2 reading comprehension (Rayner, Chace, Slattery & Ashby, 2006). The goal of this study was thus to determine whether native and non-native readers are sensitive to the consistency of a word’s component GPCs during lexical processing and to compare this sensitivity among readers from different L1s.

Keywords: ESL, reading, phonological activation, assembled phonology, eye-tracking
Article outline
  • 1.L1 English lexical processing
  • 2.L2 lexical processing
  • 3.The current study
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Materials
    • 4.3Procedure
    • 4.4Measures and analyses
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Comprehension accuracy
    • 5.2Eye-gaze measures
    • 5.3Summary
  • 6.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19026.mar
References
Abu-Rabia, S.
(1999) The effect of Arabic vowels on the reading comprehension of second- and sixth-grade native Arab children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(1), 93–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Reading in a root–based–morphology language: The case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(3), 299–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akamatsu, N.
(2003) The effects of first language orthographic features on second language reading in text. Language Learning, 53(2), 207–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alario, F. X., De Cara, B., & Ziegler, J. C.
(2007) Automatic activation of phonology in silent reading is parallel: Evidence from beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97(3), 205–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J.
(2010) Phonology is fundamental in skilled reading: Evidence from ERPs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 95–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J., & Clifton, C.
(2005) The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading. Cognition, 96(3), B89–B100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J., Dix, H., Bontrager, M., Dey, R., & Archer, A.
(2013) Phonemic awareness contributes to text reading fluency: Evidence from eye movements. School Psychology Review, 42(2), 157–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J., & Martin, A. E.
(2008) Prosodic phonological representations early in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(1), 224–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J., & Rayner, K.
(2004) Representing syllable information during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 391–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J., Rayner, K., & Clifton, C.
(2005) Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(6), 1065–1086. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J., Sanders, L. D., & Kingston, J.
(2009) Skilled readers begin processing sub-phonemic features by 80ms during visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 84–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J., Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Rayner, K.
(2006) Vowel processing during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(2), 416–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J., Yang, J., Evans, K. H. C., & Rayner, K.
(2012) Eye movements and the perceptual span in silent and oral reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(4), 634–640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P.
(2010) Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R.
(2007) The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barber, H. A., Otten, L. J., Kousta, S.-T., & Vigliocco, G.
(2013) Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task. Brain and Language, 125(1), 47–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. J., & MacWhinney, B.
(2000) Phonological priming in children’s picture naming. Journal of Child Language, 27(2), 335–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. L., & Haynes, M.
(1985) Literacy background and reading development in a second language. In H. Carr (Ed.), The development of reading skills (pp. 19–34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chace, K. H., Rayner, K., & Well, A. D.
(2005) Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: Effects of reading skill. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 59(3), 209–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Y. R.
(1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chateau, D., & Jared, D.
(2003) Spelling–sound consistency effects in disyllabic word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(2), 255–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M.
(1993) Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100(4), 589–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K.
(1994) Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(6), 1197–1211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. C.
(2001) DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniels, P. T., & Bright, W.
(1996) The world’s writing systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darcy, I., Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., Glover, J., Kaden, C., McGuire, M., & Scott, J. H.
(2012) Direct mapping of acoustics to phonology: On the lexical encoding of front rounded vowels in L1 English– L2 French acquisition. Second Language Research, 28(1), 5–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de León Rodríguez, D., Buetler, K. A., Eggenberger, N., Laganaro, M., Nyffeler, T., Annoni, J.-M., & Müri, R. M.
(2016) The impact of language opacity and proficiency on reading strategies in bilinguals: An eye movement study. Frontiers in Psychology, 71, 649. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de León Rodríguez, D., Buetler, K. A., Eggenberger, N., Preisig, B. C., Schumacher, R., Laganaro, M., … Müri, R. M.
(2016) The modulation of reading strategies by language opacity in early bilinguals: An eye movement study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 567–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, S.
(2006) Chinese (Mandarin): Phonology. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (2nd Edition, pp. 351–355). Boston, MA: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P. E.
(2010) Uses of eye-tracking data in second language sentence processing research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 301, 149–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duyck, W., Vanderelst, D., Desmet, T., & Hartsuiker, R. J.
(2008) The frequency effect in second-language visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 850–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C.
(1999) Phases of development in learning to read words. In J. O. R. Beard (Ed.), Reading development and the teaching of reading: A psychological perspective (pp. 79–108). Oxford, England: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
(2015) How children learn to read words. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Reading (pp. 293–310). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fender, M.
(2003) English word recognition and word integration skills of native Arabic- and Japanese-speaking learners of English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(02), 289–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Spelling knowledge and reading development: Insights from Arab ESL learners. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(1), 19–42.Google Scholar
Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J.
(1992) Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked non-word priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 45(3), 353–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, J.
(2008) Face to face with the ghost in the machine: Psycholinguistics and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 361–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folk, J. R.
(1999) Phonological codes are used to access the lexicon during silent reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 892–906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Godfroid, A.
(2020) Eye tracking in second language acquisition and bilingualism: A research synthesis and methodological guide. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K.
(2011) Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(2), 186–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodman, K. S.
(1967) Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(4), 126–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grant, A., Gottardo, A., & Geva, E.
(2012) Measures of reading comprehension: Do they measure different skills for children learning English as a second language? Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1899–1928. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamada, M., & Koda, K.
(2008) Influence of first language orthographic experience on second language decoding and word learning. Language Learning, 58(1), 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawelka, S., Gagl, B., & Wimmer, H.
(2010) A dual-route perspective on eye movements of dyslexic readers. Cognition, 115(3), 367–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R.
(2006) Native speakers of Arabic and ESL texts: Evidence for the transfer of written word identification processes. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 321–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. M., Dixon, P., Petersen, A., Twilley, L. C., & Ferreira, F.
(1995) Evidence for the use of phonological representations during transsaccadic word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 82–97.Google Scholar
Holes, C.
(2004) Modern Arabic: Structures, functions, and varieties. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Inhoff, A. W.
(1984) Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(5), 612–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R.
(1998) Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 29–54). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inhoff, A. W., & Topolski, R.
(1994) Use of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading and in on-line and delayed naming tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(5), 689–713. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. F.
(2009) Random effect: Should I stay or should I go? Retrieved from [URL]
Jared, D.
(2002) Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 723–750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S.
(1990) The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(6), 687–715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S.
(1990) Naming multisyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 92–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kissling, E. M.
(2012) Cross-linguistic differences in the immediate serial recall of consonants versus vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(03), 605–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koda, K.
(1989) Effects of L1 orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(2), 201–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990) The use of L1 reading strategies in L2 reading: Effects of L1 orthographic structures on L2 phonological recoding strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(04), 393–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koda, K., & Zehler, A. M.
(2008) Learning to read across languages: Cross-linguistic relationships in first- and second-language literacy development. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y.-A., Binder, K. S., Kim, J.-O., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K.
(1999) Activation of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 948–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A.
(1998) Evidence for the use of assembled phonology in accessing the meaning of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(3), 573–592.Google Scholar
Leung, C. Y., Sugiura, M., Abe, D., & Yoshikawa, L.
(2014) The perceptual span in second language reading: An eye-tracking study using a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4(05), 585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luegi, P., Costa, A., & Faria, I.
(2011) Using eye-tracking to detect reading difficulties. Journal of Eye Tracking, Visual Cognition and Emotion, 1(1), 41–49.Google Scholar
Luo, C. R., Johnson, R. A., & Gallo, D. A.
(1998) Automatic activation of phonological information in reading: Evidence from the semantic relatedness decision task. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 833–843. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McBride-Chang, C., Bialystok, E., Chong, K. K. Y., & Li, Y.
(2004) Levels of phonological awareness in three cultures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89(2), 93–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McBride-Chang, C., & Ho, C. S.-H.
(2005) Predictors of beginning reading in Chinese and English: A 2-year longitudinal study of Chinese kindergartners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 117–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonald, S. A.
(2006) Effects of number-of-letters on eye movements during reading are independent from effects of spatial word length. Visual Cognition, 13(1), 89–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miellet, S., & Sparrow, L.
(2004) Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: Evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading. Brain and Language, 90(1), 299–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H., & Geva, E.
(1999) The contribution of phonological and orthographic processing skills to adult ESL reading: Evidence from native speakers of Farsi. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(02), 241–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, R. L., Jared, D., & Haigh, C. A.
(2012) Does phonology play a role when skilled readers read high-frequency words? Evidence from ERPs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(9), 1361–1384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ota, M., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Haywood, S. L.
(2009) The KEY to the ROCK: Near-homophony in nonnative visual word recognition. Cognition, 111(2), 263–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parkin, A.
(1982) Phonological recoding in lexical decision: Effects of spelling-to-sound regularity depend on how regularity is defined. Memory & Cognition, 10(1), 43–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pasquarella, A., Gottardo, A., & Grant, A.
(2012) Comparing factors related to reading comprehension in adolescents who speak English as a first (L1) or second (L2) language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(6), 475–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A.
(2003) The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Bell, L.
(1991) Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(4), 473–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L.
(2002) The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Stafura, J.
(2014) Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H.
(1998) The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(1), 101–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I.
(1992) Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam: North-Holland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K.
(1996) Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K.
(1992) Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 148–162.Google Scholar
Prior, A.
(2012) Reading in more than one language: Behavior and brain perspectives. In D. Molfese, Z. Breznitz, V. W. Berninger, & O. Rubinsten (Eds.), Listening to many voices: Reading, writing, mathematics and the brain (pp. 131–156). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rau, A. K., Moll, K., Snowling, M. J., & Landerl, K.
(2015) Effects of orthographic consistency on eye movement behavior: German and English children and adults process the same words differently. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1301, 92–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K.
(1975) The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J.
(2006) Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 241–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A.
(1995) Phonological codes are automatically activated during reading: Evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. Psychological Science, 6(1), 26–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., & Bélanger, N. N.
(2010) Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 834–839. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A.
(2013) Using eye-tracking to investigate topics in L2 acquisition and L2 processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(02), 213–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A., & Meara, P.
(1991) The case of the invisible vowels: Arabic speakers reading English words. Reading in a Foreign Language, 7(2), 531–540.Google Scholar
Sagarra, N., & Seibert Hanson, A.
(2011) Eyetracking methodology: A user’s guide for linguistic research. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 41, 543–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saigh, K., & Schmitt, N.
(2012) Difficulties with vocabulary word form: The case of Arabic ESL learners. System, 40(1), 24–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L.
(1989) A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
(1984) When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(3), 383–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K.
(2000) Spelling-sound regularity effects on eye fixations in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(2), 402–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L.
(2008) On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K.
(2010) The influence of text legibility on eye movements during reading. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(8), 1129–1148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson-Panos, K., & Thomas-Ružić, M.
(1983) The least you should know about Arabic: Implications for the ESL writing instructor. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 609–623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tolchinsky, L., Levin, I., Aram, D., & McBride-Chang, C.
(2012) Building literacy in alphabetic, abjad and morphosyllabic systems. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1573–1598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tolentino, L. C., & Tokowicz, N.
(2009) Are pumpkins better than heaven? An ERP investigation of order effects in the concrete-word advantage. Brain and Language, 110(1), 12–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D.
(1995) The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 107–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuninetti, A., Warren, T., & Tokowicz, N.
(2015) Cue strength in second-language processing: An eye-tracking study. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(3), 568–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Orden, G. C.
(1987) A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 181–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., & Geva, E.
(2003) Spelling performance of Chinese children using English as a second language: Lexical and visual–orthographic processes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(01), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., & Koda, K.
(2005) Commonalities and differences in word identification skills among learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 55(1), 71–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A.
(2003) Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87(2), 129–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wheat, K. L., Cornelissen, P. L., Frost, S. J., & Hansen, P. C.
(2010) During visual word recognition, phonology is accessed within 100 ms and may be mediated by a speech production code: Evidence from magnetoencephalography. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(15), 5229–5233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitford, V., O’driscoll, G. A., Pack, C. C., Joober, R., Malla, A., & Titone, D.
(2013) Reading impairments in schizophrenia relate to individual differences in phonological processing and oculomotor control: Evidence from a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 57–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitford, V., & Titone, D.
(2012) Second-language experience modulates first- and second-language word frequency effects: Evidence from eye movement measures of natural paragraph reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 73–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Second-language experience modulates eye movements during first- and second-language sentence reading: Evidence from a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1118–1129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. D.
(1988) The MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine readable dictionary, Version 2. Behavior Research Methods, 20(1), 6–11.Google Scholar
Winke, P. M., Godfroid, A., & Gass, S. M.
(2013) Introduction to the special issue: Eye-movement recordings in second language research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(02), 205–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M. K., Farnsworth, T., & Herman, J.
(2008) Validity issues in assessing English language learners’ language proficiency. Educational Assessment, 13(2–3), 80–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U.
(2005) Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Montant, M., & Jacobs, A. M.
(1997) The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(4), 533–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G., & Jacobs, A.
(1997) What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29(4), 600–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar