Article published in:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 4:1 (2021) ► pp. 4864
References

References

Almbark, R.
(2012) The perception and production of SSBE vowels by Syrian Arabic learners: The foreign language model (Doctoral dissertation, University of York, York, UK). Retrieved from http://​etheses​.whiterose​.ac​.uk​/3736/
Antoniou, M.
(2010) One head, two languages: Speech production and perception in Greek–English bilinguals (Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney) Retrieved from http://​researchdirect​.westernsydney​.edu​.au​/islandora​/object​/uws:8854
Best, C. T.
(1995) A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception: New Directions in Research and Theory. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 171–204). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C.
(1999) Development of Language-Specific Influences on Speech Perception and Production in Pre-verbal Infancy. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1261–1263). Department of Linguistics, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Strange, W.
(1992) Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20(3), 305–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M.
(2007) Non-native and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D., & Molis, M.
(2001) On the Evidence for Maturational Constraints in Second-Language Acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 235–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(2009) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://​www​.fon​.hum​.uva​.nl​/praat/
Bongaerts, T.
(1999) Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late learners. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133–160). Mawhaw: LEA.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E.
(1997) Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(4), 447–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., Yeni-Komshian, G., Zurif, E. & Carbone, E.
(1973) The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: the case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 5, 421–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B.
(2009) The relationship between speech perception and production in second language learners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 2754. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J.
(2003) Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In A. Meyer & N. Schiller (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 319–355). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W.
(1987) Production and perception of English Stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 67–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E.
(1995) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 233–277). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T.
(1997) Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 169–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C.
(1980) Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 113–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgiou, G. P.
(2019a) ‘Bit’ and ‘beat’ are heard as the same: Mapping the vowel perceptual patterns of Greek-English bilingual children. Language Sciences, 72, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019b) EFL teachers’ cognitions about pronunciation in Cyprus. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(6), 538–550. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019c) Cue-reliance and vowel perceptual patterns of Cypriot Greek children who learn English. Journal of Experimental Phonetics, 28, 229–253.Google Scholar
(2018) Discrimination of L2 Greek vowel contrasts: Evidence from learners with Arabic L1 background. Speech Communication, 102, 68–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grasseger, H.
(1991) Perception and production of Italian plosives by Italian learners. Actes du XIIème Congrès international des sciences phonétiques (pp. 290–293). Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence, Service des Publications.Google Scholar
Guillelmon, D., & Grosjean, F.
(2001) The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 29(3), 503–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, J. C. L., & Park, S.-G.
(1997) Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(3), 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jilka, M.
(2009) Talent and proficiency in language. In G. Dogil, S. Reiterer (Eds.), Language Talent and Brain Activity (pp. 1–16). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L.
(1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P.
(2003) Phonetic data analysis: an introduction to field work and instrumental techniques. USA: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar
Leppik, K., & Lippus, P.
(2014) A comparative study of Estonian and Spanish vowels in L1 and L2 production. In K. Jähi & L. Taimi (Eds), XXVIII Fonetiikan päivät, Turku 25–26, lokakuuta 2013. Konferenssijulkaisu. Turku, Finland: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Levy, E. S. & Law II, F. F.
(2010) Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: Language experience, consonantal context, and the perception-production relationship. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 1290–1305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A. & Mattingly, I.
(1985) The Motor Theory of Speech Perception Revised. Cognition, 21, 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A., K. Harris, H. Hoffman, & Griffith, B.
(1957) The Discrimination of Speech Sounds Within and Across Phoneme Boundaries. J. Exp Psych, 54, 358–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mack, M.
(1990) Phonetic transfer in a French-English bilingual child. In P. H. Nelde (Ed.), Language Attitudes and Language Conflict (pp. 107–124). Bonn: Duemmler.Google Scholar
Papachristou, V.
(2011) Explicit vs. implicit pronunciation teaching to Greek children: The case of the acquisition of English vowels. Selected papers from the 19th International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics (pp. 371–381). Thessaloniki, Greece.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A. & Strange, W.
(1982) The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 243–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Themistocleous, C.
(2017) Modern Greek vowels and the nature of acoustic gradience. Phonetica, 74(3), 157–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Flege, J. E., & Liu, S.
(2000) Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Lang. Cognition, 3(2), 131–149.Google Scholar