Article published in:Studies of Bilingual Processing Presented to Kenneth I. Forster
Edited by Nan Jiang
[Journal of Second Language Studies 4:2] 2021
► pp. 204–223
Why do non-native English speakers show masked form priming when native speakers do not?
Native English speakers do not show masked priming effects in lexical decision when a prime word is related to its target purely on the basis of orthographic form (e.g., pillow-PILL, protest-PROTECT). There is strong evidence, however, that non-native English speakers do show such form priming. This paper explores the possible cognitive mechanisms behind this difference between native and non-native speakers. Taft and Li (2020) found that only non-native speakers (with Chinese as their first language) showed priming when the nonword prime ended in the same embedded word as the word target (e.g., plerough-THOROUGH), but a newly reported experiment goes on to show priming for native speakers as well when the shared letter-combination is not itself a word (e.g., celtoise-TORTOISE). This contrast in results leads to the interpretation that native speakers have a specific mechanism for activating embedded words that is important when recognizing polymorphemic words through their stems. It is suggested that non-native speakers, or at least those with Chinese as their first language, do not engage or are slow in engaging such a mechanism. The form priming that they demonstrate arises from facilitated processing of the repeated letters rather than the pre-activation of a lexical representation.
Keywords: bilingual lexical processing, masked form priming, embedded word processing, lexical processing, polysyllabic word recognition
- Masked form priming for native speakers
- Masked form priming for non-native speakers
- Explaining L2 form priming
- Embedded word processing
- Taft and Li (2020)
- The experiment
Published online: 06 May 2021
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.
Beyersmann, E., Casalis, S., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J.
Beyersmann, E., Cavalli, E., Casalis, S., & Colé, P.
Beyersmann, E., & Grainger, J.
Ciaccio, L. A., & Clahsen, H.
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E.
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J.
Finley, A., & Penningroth, S.
Fiorentino, R., & Fund-Reznicek, E.
Foote, R., Qasem, M., & Trentman, E.
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C.
Forster, K. I., & Veres, C.
Grainger, J., & Beyersmann, E.
Hasenäcker, J., Beyersmann, E., & Schroeder, S.
Heyer, V., & Clahsen, H.
Kim, S. Y., Wang, M., & Taft, M.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P., & Christensen, R.
Li, J. & Taft, M.
Li, J., Taft, M., & Xu, J.
Li, M., Jiang, N., & Gor, K.
Morris, J., Porter, J. H., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J.
New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C.
Qiao, X., & Forster, K. I.
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H.
Silva, R., & Clahsen, H.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I.
Taft, M., & Li, J.
Taft, M., Li, S., & Beyersmann, E.
Taft, M., Xu, J., & Li, S.