Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 5:2 (2022) ► pp.171205
References (34)
References
Adelman, James S., Gordon D. A. Brown, & José F. Quesada. 2006. Contextual Diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science 19(9). 814–823. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics with R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Demythologizing the word frequency effect: A discriminative learning perspective. The Mental Lexicon 5(3). 436–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Petar Milin, & Michael Ramscar. 2016. Frequency in lexical processing. Aphasiaology 30(11). 1174–1220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balota, David A. & Daniel H. Spieler. 1998. The utility of item level analyses in model evaluation: a reply to Seidenberg and Plaut. Psychological Science 9(3). 238–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bestgen, Yves & Sylviane Granger. 2009. Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach. Journal of Second Language Writing 261. 28–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc & Boris New. 2009. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41(4). 977–990. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc, Pawel Mandera, Samantha F. McCormick, & Emmanuel Keuleers. 2019. Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods 511. 467–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, John B. 1970. An alternative to Juilland’s usage coefficient for lexical frequencies and a proposal for a standard frequency index. Computer Studies in the Humanities and Verbal Behaviour 3(2). 61–65.Google Scholar
Durrant, Phil & Norbert Schmitt. 2009. To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations? International Review of Applied Linguistics 471. 157–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. 2007a. Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics 27(1). 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b. The Associative-Cognitive CREED. In Bill VanPatten & Jessica Williams. (eds.), Theories of second language acquisition: an introduction, 77–95. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., Rita Simpson-Vlach, & Carson Maynard. 2008. Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 42(3). 375–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evert, Stefan. 2009. Corpora and collocations. In Anke Lüdeling & Merja. Kytö. (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 21, 1212–1248. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2008. Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4). 403–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora: further explorations. In Stefan Th. Gries, Stefanie Wulff, & Mark Davies. (eds.), Corpus linguistic applications: current studies, new directions, 197–212. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019a. Ten lectures on corpus-linguistic approaches: Applications for usage-based and psycholinguistic research. Leiden & Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019b. 15 years of collostructions: some long overdue additions/corrections (to/of actually all sorts of corpus-linguistics measures). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24(3). 385–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. Analyzing dispersion. In Magali Paquot & Stefan Th. Gries. (eds.), A practical handbook of corpus linguistics, 99–118. Berlin & New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan, Th. 2021. What do (some of) our association measures measure (most)? Association? Journal of Second Language Studies. Available online: 12 November 2021. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juilland, Alphonse G., Dorothy R. Brodin, & Catherine Davidovitch. 1970. Frequency dictionary of French words. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kromer, Victor. 2003. An usage measure based on psychophysical relations. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 10(2). 177–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakes, Michael P. & Malcolm Farrow. 2007. Use of the Chi-Squared Test to examine vocabulary differences in English language corpora representing seven different countries. Literary and Linguistic Computing 22(1). 85–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pecina, Pavel. 2009. Lexical association measures and collocation extraction. Language Resources and Evaluation 44(1–2). 137–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Stephen. 2004. Understanding Inverse Document Frequency: on theoretical arguments of IDF. Journal of Documentation 60(5). 503–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosengren, Inger. 1971. The quantitative concept of language and its relation to the structure of frequency dictionaries. Études de linguistique appliquée (Nouvelle Série) 11. 103–127.Google Scholar
Savický, Petr & Jaroslava Hlaváčová. 2002. Measures of word commonness. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 9(3), 215–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans Joerg. 2010. Entrenchment, salience, and basic levels. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 117–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna. 2015. Collocation in beginner learner writing: A longitudinal study. System 531. 148–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spärck Jones, Karen. 1972. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in information retrieval. Journal of Documentation 28(1). 11–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spieler, Daniel H. & David A. Balota. 1997. Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science 8(6). 411–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Benjamin V., Daniel Brennerm, D. Kyle Danielson, Matthew C. Kelley, Filip Nenadić, & Michelle Sims. 2019. The Massive Auditory Lexical Decision (MALD) database. Behavior Research Methods 511. 1187–1204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zagorsky, Jay L. 2007. Do you have to be smart to be rich? The impact of IQ on wealth, income and financial distress. Intelligence 35(5). 489–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Dubois, Tanguy, Magali Paquot & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2024. Future-time reference in spoken EFL. Journal of Second Language Studies DOI logo
Nelson, Robert N.
2024. Groundhog Day is Not a Good Model for Corpus Dispersion. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wulff, Stefanie & Stefan Th. Gries
2024.  CLLT ‘versus’ Corpora and IJCL: a (half serious) keyness analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20:3  pp. 461 ff. DOI logo
Jeaco, Stephen
2023. How can we communicate (visually) what we (usually) mean by collocation and keyness?. Journal of Second Language Studies 6:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th.
2022. Toward more careful corpus statistics: uncertainty estimates for frequencies, dispersions, association measures, and more. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1:1  pp. 100002 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th.
2025. Corpus Linguistics: Quantitative Methods. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Th Gries, Stefan
2024.  Corrections to Nelson (2023): DP norm and D KLnorm are Not Wrong on Pi at All . Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 31:1  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.