Exploring same- and different grade peer interactions among EFL young learners
Tomas Kos | Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany
Grounded in the sociocultural theoretical framework, this study compared peer interaction among same-grade (similar
proficiency) and different grade (different proficiency) pairs in terms of patterns of interaction established and learning opportunities
that such interactions afford. The same learners (N = 24) aged between 10 and 12 interacted with the
same and different grade partners during common classroom lessons in two EFL classrooms. Findings reveal
that grade matched pairs tended to establish patterns of interaction conducive to learning while different grade pairs tended not to.
However, the relationship between patterns of interaction and learning opportunities is not clear-cut.
Ahmadian, M., & Tajabadi, A. (2017). Patterns
of interaction in young EFL learners’ pair work: the relationship between pair dynamics and vocabulary
acquisition. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language
Studies,
22
(3), 98–114.
Azkarai, A., & Kopinska, M. (2020). Young
EFL learners and collaborative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task
motivation. System,
94
1,
Berman, M. (1998). A
Multiple Intelligences Road to an ELT
Classroom. Carmarthen: Crown House.
Butler, Y. G., & Zeng, W. (2014). Young
foreign language learners’ interactions during task-based paired assessments. Language
Assessment
Quarterly,
11
(1), 45–75.
Butler, Y. G., & Zeng, W. (2015). Young
foreign language learners’ interactional development in task-based paired assessment in their first and foreign languages: a
case of English learners in
China. Education,
13
(3), 292–321.
Chen, W. (2017). The effect of conversation engagement on L2 learning opportunities. ELT Journal, 711, 329–340.
Chen, W. (2018). Patterns
of pair interaction in communicative tasks: the transition process and effect on L2 teaching and
learning. ELT
Journal,
72
(4), 425–434.
Damon, W. & Phelps, E. (1989). Strategic
uses of peer learning in children’s education. In T. J. Berndt & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer
relationships in child
development (pp. 135–157). New York: Wiley.
Dao, P., & McDonough, K. (2017). The
effect of task role on Vietnamese EFL learners’ collaboration in mixed proficiency
dyads. System,
65
1, 15–24.
Davin, J. K., & Donato, R. (2013). Student
collaboration and teacher-directed classroom dynamic assessment: A complementary
pairing. Foreign Language
Annals,
46
(1), 5–22.
Doff, S. & Giesler, T. (2014). Jack in search of Jill. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der individuellen Förderung im Englischunterricht. In Thorsten Bohlet al. (Eds.), Friedrich Jahresheft “Fördern” pp. (79–56). Seelze: Friedrich.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective
scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian
approaches to second language research. Vygotskian approaches to second language
research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford: University Press.
Frank, S. S. (2014). Unterrichten in altersdurchmischten Klassen mit Young World 1–4. Baar: Klett und Balmer.
García Mayo, M. P. (ed.) (2017). Learning
Foreign Languages in Primary School:Research
Insights. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. ISBN-13: 978-1-78309-810-1.
García Mayo, M. P., & Agirre, A. I. (2016). Task
repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: an exploratory
study. The Language Learning
Journal,
44
(4), 451–466.
García Mayo, M. P., & Ibarrola, L. (2015). Do
children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL
settings. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied
Linguistics,
54
1, 40–54.
Heinzmann, S., Ries, S., & Wicki, W. (2015). Expertise „Altersdurchmischter Fremdsprachenunterricht im Fach Englisch. Forschungsbericht, 51. Luzern: Pädagogische Hochschule Luzern.
Hoffman, J. (2002). Flexible
grouping strategies in the multiage classroom. Theory into
Practice,
41
(1), 47–52. Retrieved
on 21 July
2022, from <[URL].>
Huf, C., & Raggl, A. (2015). Social
orders and interactions among children in age mixed classes in primary schools – new perspectives from a synthesis of
ethnographic data. Ethnography and
Education, 10(2), 230–241.
Hyry-Beihammer, E. K. & Hascher, T. (2015). Multi-grade teaching practices in Austrian and Finnish primary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 74(1), 104–113. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved August 19, 2022 from [URL].
Kalaoja, E., & Pietarinen, J. (2009). Small
rural primary schools in Finland:A pedagogically valuable part of the school
network. International Journal of Educational
Research,
48
(2), 109–116.
Kopinska, M. & Azkarai, A. (2020). Exploring
young EFL learners’ motivation: Individual versus pair work on dictogloss tasks. Studies in
Second Language Learning and
Teaching,
10
(3), 607–630.
Kos, T. (2017). Peer
assistance among mixed-age pairs in mixed-age EFL secondary school classrooms in
Germany. European Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 7(1), 61–112.
Kos, T. (2019). Patterns
of Interaction: Analysis of Mixed-Age Peer Interactions in Secondary School Classrooms In
Germany. Journal of Language Teaching and
Learning, 9(1), 1–29. [URL]
Kos, T. (2021a). Exploring
young learners’ L2 development and perceptions of mixed-age and same-age peer interactions in EFL mixed-age
classrooms. European Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 9(2), 331–364.
Kos, T. (2021b). What
exactly is mutuality? An analysis of mixed-age peer interactions on classroom tasks in German secondary school
classrooms. In M. García Mayo (Eds.), Working
Collaboratively in Second/Foreign Language
Learning (pp. 59–88). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using
collaborative language production tasks to promote learners’ language awareness. Language
Awareness,
3
(2), 73–93.
Kutnick, P., & Kington, A. (2005). Children’s
friendships and learning in school: Cognitive enhancement through social interaction?British
Journal of Educational
Psychology,
75
(4), 1–19.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2008). Sociocultural
Theory and the Teaching of Second
Languages. London: Equinox Publishing.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural
theory and the genesis of second language
development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leeser, M. (2004). Learner
proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching
Research,
8
(1), 55–81.
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns
of Computer-mediated Interaction in Small Writing Groups using Wikis. Computer Assisted
Language
Learning,
26
(1), 61–82.
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Explaining
Dynamic Interactions in Wiki-based Collaborative Writing. Language Learning &
Technology,
21
(1), 96–120.
Little, A. W., (2005). Learning and teaching in multigrade settings. Paper prepared for UNESCO 2005 EFA Monitoring Report.
Mercer, N. (2005). Sociocultural Discourse Analysis: Analysing Classroom Talk as a Social Mode of Thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 137–168.
Mercer, N. (2010). The
analysis of classroom talk: Strengths and weaknesses. British Journal of Educational
Psychology,
80
(1), 1–14.
Ohta, A. S. (2000). Rethinking
interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2
grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (Eds.), Sociocultural
Theory and Second Language
Learning (pp. 51–78). Oxford: Oxford University.
Oliver, R., Philp, J. & Duchesne, S. (2017). Children
working it out together: A comparison of younger and older learners collaborating in task based
interaction. System,
69
1, 1–14.
Panagiotopoulou, A. J., & Carle, U. (2004). Sprachentwicklung und Schriftspracher- werb. Beobachtungs- und Fördermöglichkeiten in Familie, Kindergarten und Grundschule. Hohengehren.
Pape, M. (2016). Didaktische Handeln in jahrgangsheterogenen Grundschulklassen. Eine qualitative Studie zur Inneren Differenzierung und zur Anleitung des Lernens [Didactic action in heterogeneous primary school classes. A qualitative study of inner differentiation and guidance in learning]. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius.
Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2014). Peer
interaction and second language learning. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 50–72.
Pinter, A. (2007). Some
benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practising with a communication
task. Language Teaching
Research, 11(2), (pp. 189–207).
Qiu, X., & Lee, M.-K. (2020). Regulated
learning and self-efficacy beliefs in peer collaborative writing: An exploratory study of L2 learners’ written products, task
discussions, and self-reports. System
(Linköping), 931, 102312-.
Saeedakhtar, A., Haqju, R., & Rouhi, A. (2021). The
impact of collaborative listening to podcasts on high school learners’ listening comprehension and vocabulary
learning. System
(Linköping), 1011, 102588-.
Saqlain, N. (2015). A Comprehensive Look at Multi-Age Education. Journal Of Educational And Social Research, 5(2), 285. Retrieved from [URL].
Shahid, K. A., Moghal, S., & Aziz, F. (2018). Mixed-Age
Group Teaching in Second Language Learning: An Observational Study of a Montessori Classroom in
Pakistan. Journal of Early Childhood Care and
Education,
2
1, 87–100.
Smit, R., & Engeli, E. (2015). An Empirical Model of Mixed-Age Teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 741, 136–145.
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns
of interaction in ESL pair work. Language
Learning,
52
1, 119–158.
Storch, N. (2021). Collaborative
writing: Promoting languaging among language learners. In María del Pilar García Mayo and Ainara Imaz Agirre (Eds.) Working
collaboratively in second/foreign language
learning (pp. 13–33). De
Gruyter – Trends in Applied Linguistics series.
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2012). Pairing
students in pair work activity. Language Teaching
Research,
17
(1), 31–48.
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’
processing, uptake and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in
Second Language
Acquisition,
32
(2), 303–334.
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging,
agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Eds.), Advanced
language learning: The contribution of Haliday and
Vygotsky (pp.95–108). London: Continuum.
Swain, M. (2010). Talking
it through: Languaging as a source of learning. In R. Batstone (Eds.), Sociocognitive
perspectives on language
use/learning (pp.112–130). Oxford: Oxford Univesrity Press.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction
and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The
Modern Language
Journal,
82
1, 320–337.
Tan, L., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2010). Pair
Interaction and Mode of Communication:Comparing Face-to-Face and Computer Mediated
Communication. Australian Review Of Applied
Linguistics,
33
1, 1–27.
Tellier, A., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2017). Raising
children’s metalinguistic awareness to enhance classroom second language
learning. In M. P. Garcia Mayo (Eds.), Learning
foreign languages in primary school: Research
insights (pp. 22–48). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Thoren, K., & Brunner, M. (2019). State-wide implementation of mixed-age learning; which types can be identified, and do they differ in their school and teaching quality?Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 221, 279–300.
Thurn, S. (2011). Individualisierung
ernst genommen. Englisch lernen in jahrgangsübergreifenden Gruppen (3/4/5). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M. & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding
in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research, Educational Psychology
Review,
22
(3), 271–297.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind
in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought
and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wagener, M. (2014). Gegenseitiges Helfen. Soziales Lernen im jahrgangsgemischten Unterricht [Helping Each Other. Social Learning in Age-mixed
Lessons]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Waschk, K. (2008). Öffnung des Englischunterrichts in der Grundschule: Studien zur Wahlfreiheit und Lernerautonomie. Duisburg: Univ.-Verl. Rhein-Ruhr.
Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer-Peer
Interaction between L2 Learners of Different Proficiency Levels: Their Interactions and
Reflections. The Canadian Modern Language
Review,
64
(2), 605–635.
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects
of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: collaborative dialogue between adult
ESL students. Language Teaching
Research,
11
(2), 121–142.
Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting
Effective Helping Behavior in Peer-Directed Groups. International Journal of Educational
Research,
39
(1), 73–97.
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices
of the mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Wu, S., Liu, D. & Li, Z. (2022). Consolidating EFL content and vocabulary learning via interactive reading. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Advance online publication.