Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Second Language Studies
Vol. 6:1 (2023) ► pp.183–205

The relationships between individual differences in working memory and language analytical ability and the effectiveness of different types of corrective feedback

| Nagano University , Japan

This study examined the relationships between individual differences in the executive component of working memory, and language analytical ability and the effectiveness of recasts, explicit correction and, metalinguistic prompts on the second-language (L2) development of the English past progressive. Participants were 155 Japanese learners of English, who were divided into recast, explicit correction, metalinguistic prompt, and task-only groups. The treatment groups completed tasks that required past progressive usage and received feedback. The executive component of working memory and language analytical ability were measured by the reading span test and LLAMA F. The outcome measures were an untimed grammaticality judgment test (UGJT) and elicited imitation test (EIT), which measured the participants’ declarative and procedural knowledge, respectively. The participants performed the pretest, immediate posttest, and delayed posttest. Multiple regression analyses showed that the executive component of working memory was significantly associated with the gain scores of the UGJT for the recast group and with the gain scores of the EIT for the metalinguistic prompt group. Language analytical ability was not associated with gain scores regardless of the test type for all groups.

Keywords: corrective feedback, language aptitude, working memory, language analytical ability, past progressive
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Literature review
      • 1.1.1CF types
      • 1.1.2Theoretical frameworks of CF
      • 1.1.3WM and LAA
      • 1.1.4The interaction of EWM and LAA with efficacy of CF
    • 1.2Current study
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Target structure
    • 2.3Treatment tasks
    • 2.4Feedback treatment
    • 2.5Tests
      • 2.5.1L2 outcome measures
      • 2.5.2EWM measure
      • 2.5.3LAA measure
    • 2.6Procedure
    • 2.7Analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Associations between EWM and LAA and the benefits of different types of feedback
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1EWM
    • 4.2LAA
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 7 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.22012.sat
References
Ahn, S.
(2012) The relationships between grammatical sensitivity, noticing of recasts and learning of Korean object relative clauses through conversational interaction. Applied Language Learning, 22 1, 47–68.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A.
(2000) The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (11), 417–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36 (3), 189–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M. A.
(2011) Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33 (2), 247–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S.
(1959) Modern language aptitude test: Form A. Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Cowan, N.
(1999) An Embedded-Processes Model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(2012) Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 621, 189–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2019) The future of aptitude research. In Z. Wen, P. Skehan, A. Biedron, S. Li, & R. L. Sparks (Eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research, and practice (pp. 317–329). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27 1, 141–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 31–64). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R.
(2009) Elicited oral imitation as a measure of implicit knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reiders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning and teaching (pp. 65–93). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fu, M., & Li, S.
(2021) The associations between implicit and explicit language aptitude and the effects of the timing of corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(3), 498–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goo, J.
(2012) Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34 (3), 445–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Corrective feedback and working memory capacity: A replication. In G. Granena, D. O. Jackson & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 279–302). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goo, J. & Mackey, A.
(2013) The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35(1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M.
(2011) Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44 (2), 137–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kourtali, N. E., & Révész, A.
(2020) The roles of recasts, task complexity, and aptitude in child second language development. Language Learning, 70 (1), 179–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P.
(2015) Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S.
(2010) The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60 (2), 309–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. Modern Language Journal, 97 (3), 634–654. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) The effects of cognitive aptitudes on the process and product of L2 interaction: A synthetic review. In L. Gurzynski (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors and researchers (pp. 41–70). Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y.
(2019) The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40 (3), 693–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F.
(2014) Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21 (4), 861–883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L.
(1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (1), 37–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R. & Ranta, L.
(2013) Counterpoint piece: The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35(1), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Saito, K.
(2010) Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32 (2), 265–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J.
(2007) Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meara, P.
(2005) LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual. Swansea: Lognostics.Google Scholar
Révész, A.
(2012) Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62 (1), 93–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, Y.
(2021) Effects of recasts, explicit correction and metalinguistic prompts on L2 knowledge of the English past tense. Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(2), 390–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2022) Associations between L2 proficiency and efficacy of corrective feedback types. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 19(2), 563–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. W.
(1995) Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu R. W. Schmidt (Ed.). HI: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center, (1–63).Google Scholar
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C.
(2016) Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38 (4), 607–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y.
(2007) The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R.
(2011) Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 2 1 (pp. 593–610). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shibasaki, H., Tokimoto, S., Ono, Y., & Inoue, T.
(2015) Developing Group-type reading span tests in English and Japanese for high school students and the examination on the relationship between working memory and English proficiency. Study of cognition psychology, 12 1, 101–120.Google Scholar
Shirahata, T.
(2015) Eigoshidoo ni okeru koukatekina ayamari teisei: Daini gengo syuutoku kenkyuu no chiken kara. [Effective grammatical corrections in English teaching: From the viewpoint of second language acquisition research]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2016) Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In G. Granena, D. O. Jackson & Y. Yilmaz (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 17–40). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E.
(2007) How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 171–195). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wen, Z.
(2016) Working memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated approach. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Working memory as language aptitude: The Phonological/Executive Model. In Z. Wen, P. Skehan, A. Biedroń, S. Li, & R. Sparks (Eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice (pp. 187–214). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z., & Skehan, P.
(2021) Stages of Acquisition and the P/E Model of Working Memory: Complementary or contrasting approaches to foreign language aptitude? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 41 1, 6–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, S., & Ma, Z.
(2016) Suppression and Working Memory in Auditory Comprehension of L2 Narratives: Evidence from Cross-Modal Priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(5), 1115–1135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yalçın, Ş., & Spada, N.
(2016) Language aptitude and grammatical difficulty: An EFL classroom-based study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38 (2), 239–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y., & Lyster, R.
(2010) Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners– acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(02), 235–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y.
(2013) Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34 (3), 344–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) The role of exposure condition in the effectiveness of explicit correction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38 (1), 65–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, R.
(2014) Measuring university-level L2 learners’ implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y., & Ellis, R.
(2020) The relative effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on the acquisition of 3rd person -s by Chinese university students: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching　Research. DOI logoGoogle Scholar