Article published in:
Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Vol. 1:1 (2022) ► pp. 67120
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Yurievna
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Almazán, Jennifer
2019Evidentiality in Tagalog. PhD dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
AnderBois, Scott
2014On the exceptional status of reportative evidentials. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 241, 234–254. Ithaca, NY: LSA and CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Beltrama, Andrea
2016Bridging the gap: Intensifiers between semantic and social meaning. PhD Dissertation, University of Chicago.
Blain, Eleanor M. & Rose-Marie Déchaine
2007Evidential types: evidence from Cree dialects. International Journal of American Linguistics 731. 257–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cable, Seth
2017The Expression of modality in Tlingit: A paucity of grammatical devices. International Journal of American Linguistics 831. 619–678. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caudal, Patrick, John Henderson & Martina Faller
2011On the Arrernte ‘quotative’ akwele. Talk presented at the 42nd Conference of the Australian Linguistics Society (ALS), Australian National University, Canberra.
Celle, Agnes
2009Hearsay adverbs and modality. In Raphael Salkie, Pierre Busuttil & Johan van der Auwera (eds.). Modality in English: Theory and description, 269–293. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve
2020Perspective-taking and pretend-play: Precursors to figurative language use in young children. Journal of Pragmatics 1561. 100–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
2009Nonfactual at t’: A neglected modal concept. In Raphael Salkie, Pierre Busuttil & Johan van der Auwera (eds.). Modality in English: Theory and description, 31–54. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine & Kjell Johan Sæbø
2004In a meditative mood: The semantics of the German reportative subjunctive. Natural Language Semantics 121. 213–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faller, Martina
2002Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
2014Reportativity, (not-)at-issueness, and assertion. In H. Leung, Z. O’Hagan, S. Bakst, A. Lutzross, J. Manker, N. Rolle & K. Sardinha (eds.). Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley: BLS. 62–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019The discourse commitments of illocutionary reportatives. Semantics and Pragmatics 12(8). 1–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. & Kim B. Bruce
2010On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 271. 81–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. & Floris Roelofsen
2017Division of labor in the interpretation of declaratives and interrogatives. Journal of Semantics 341. 237–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fintel, Kai von
2004Would you believe it? The King of France is back! Presuppositions and truth-value intuitions. In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.). Descriptions and Beyond, 315–341. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1979Footing. Semiotica 251. 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul
1989Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gunlogson, Christine
2001True to form: Rising and falling declaratives as questions in English. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, A., M. Vilkuna, R. Korhonen, V. Koivisto, T. R. Heinonen & I. Alho
2004Iso suomen kielioppi [The large grammar of Finnish]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Kangasniemi, Heikki
1992Modal expressions in Finnish. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo & Erika Sandman
2013The particles näköjään (‘I see/seemingly’) and kuulemma (‘hearsay’) of Finnish as evidential markers. Talk presented at the 12th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC), June 2013, University of Alberta, Canada.
Kittilä, Seppo, Lotta Jalava & Erika Sandman
2018What can different types of linguistic data teach us on evidentiality? In Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop & Gijs Mulder (eds.). Evidence for evidentiality, 281–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korotkova, Natasha
2020Evidential meaning and (not-)at-issueness. Semantics and Pragmatics 131, article 4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Heterogeneity and uniformity in the evidential domain. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Kuiri, Kaija
1984Referointi kainuun ja pohjois-karjalan murteissa. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Leslie, Alan
1987Pretense and representation: The origins of ‘Theory of Mind.’ Psychological Review 941. 412–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Sarah
2010Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
2014Varieties of update. Semantics and Pragmatics 71. 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordlund, Taru, & Heli Pekkarinen
2014Grammaticalisation of the Finnish stance adverbial muka ‘as if, supposedly, allegedly’. In I. Taavitsainen, A. H. Jucker & J. Tuominen (eds.). Diachronic corpus pragmatics (Pragmatics & Beyond, new series, 243), 53–75. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pancheva, Roumyana & Deniz Rudin
2019Speaker discourse roles and the discourse profile of reportative evidentials. In J. Schloeder, D. McHugh & F. Roelofsen (eds.). Proceedings of the 22nd Amsterdam Colloquium, 327–336.Google Scholar
Papafragou, Anna
2006Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua 1161. 1688–1702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Hazel
2010A modification of the “Hey, wait a minute” test. Snippets 221. 7–8.Google Scholar
Potts, Chris
2005The logic of conversational implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rozumko, Agata
2019Between acknowledgement and countering: Interpersonal functions of English reportative adverbs. Journal of Pragmatics 1401. 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadeniemi, Matti & Jouko Vesikansa
1988–1989Nykysuomen Sanakirja [Dictionary of Contemporary Finnish]. Porvoo: WSOY.Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli & Matthias Schenner
2007Embedded evidentials in Bulgarian. In E. Puig-Waldmüller (ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11 1, 525–539. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Seppänen, Eeva-Leena
1997Suomen perfektin merkityksestä keskusteluaineiston valossa [The meaning of the perfect tense in Finnish in the light of conversational data]. Virittäjä 1011. 2–26.Google Scholar
Shanon, Benny
1976On the two kinds of presuppositions in natural language. Foundations of Language 141. 247–249.Google Scholar
Simons, Mandy, Judith Tonhauser, David Beaver & Craige Roberts
2010What projects and why. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 201, 309–327. Ithaca, NY: LSA and CLC Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snider, Todd
2017Anaphoric reference to propositions. PhD dissertation. Cornell University.
Stalnaker, Robert C.
1978Assertion. In Peter Cole (ed.), Pragmatics, 315–332. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taniguchi, Ai
2017The formal pragmatics of non-at-issue intensification in English and Japanese. PhD dissertation, Michigan State University.
Tonhauser, Judith
2012Diagnosing (not-)at-issue content. In Proceedings of Semantics of Under-represented Languages 61, 239–254. Amherst: GLSAGoogle Scholar
Walker, Marilyn A.
1996Inferring acceptance and rejection in dialogue by default rules of inference. Language and Speech 391. 265–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Anna Socka
2017aHow much does pragmatics help to contrast the meaning of hearsay adverbs? Part 1. Studies in Polish Linguistics 121. 21–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017bHow much does pragmatics help to contrast the meaning of hearsay adverbs? Part 2. Studies in Polish Linguistics 121. 75–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas
1988A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 121. 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evidentiality in Finnish