Cover not available
Article published In:
Approaches to Hungarian 18: Special issue of the Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:1 (2023)
Edited by Donka F. Farkas, Gábor Alberti and Balázs Surányi
[Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:1] 2023
► pp. 50–73

Associative plurals and their associates

An integrated approach to the nominal plural markers of Hungarian

ORCID logo | Eötvös Loránd University | Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics
This paper presents an integrated approach to the morphosyntax of the three nominal plural markers of Hungarian: multiplicative -k, possessive -i, and associative plural -ék. It explicates the relationship between the associative and multiplicative plural markers, and between the associative plural and the anaphoric possession marker -é. Central in the analysis proposed is the hypothesis that the marker -é consistently plays the role of a predicational relator formally licensing the silence of one of the two terms in the predication relationship that it mediates. The syntax underlying the associative plural involves an asyndetic coordination relation in which the content of a silent plural pronoun is specified by a complex noun phrase headed by the silent noun group. The analysis has im-plications for the syntax of number and demonstratives and for the licensing of silent nouns and pronouns.
Keywords: multiplicative plural, possessive plural, associative plural, anaphoric possessive, predication, asyndetic specification, silent nouns, pronouns, demonstratives
Article outline
  • 1.The aim and structure of this paper
  • 2.Number in possessive noun phrases
  • 3.Anaphoric possessive -é
    • 3.1Preamble: English anaphoric possessives
    • 3.2Hungarian anaphoric possessive -é
  • 4.Associative plural -ék
    • 4.1The -é of associative plurals as a relator licensing silent group
    • 4.2Asyndetic specification, with the pronoun as the second term
    • 4.3The locus of plural marking in associative plurals
    • 4.4The locus of the definite article in associative plurals
    • 4.5On the size of the subject of group
    • 4.6Associative plurals in oblique contexts
    • 4.7On licensing silence
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 19 June 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00014.dik
References (23)
References
Bartos, Huba. 2001. Az inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai háttere [The syntactic background of inflectional phenomena]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan, Vol. 3, Morfológia, 653–762. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Judy & Christina Tortora. 2005. Two types of possessive forms in English. Lingua 1151. 1221–1242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Besten, Hans den. 1996. Associative DPs. In Crit Cremers & Marcel den Dikken (eds), Linguistics in the Netherlands 131. 13–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camacho, José. 2021. The structure of plural proper names in Spanish and other languages. Ms., Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Dékány, Éva. 2015. The syntax of anaphoric possessives in Hungarian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 331. 1121–1168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. The Hungarian nominal functional sequence. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den. 1999. On the structural representation of possession and agreement. The case of (anti-)agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases. In István Kenesei (ed.), Crossing boundaries: Theoretical advances in Central and Eastern European languages, 137–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. ‘Pluringulars’, pronouns and quirky agreement. The Linguistic Review 181. 19–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. On the morphosyntax of (in)alienably possessed noun phrases. In Éva Dékány, Katalin É. Kiss & Balázs Surányi (eds), Approaches to Hungarian 141, 121–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den & Éva Dékány. 2022. On collectives with numerals. Ms., Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den & Alexandra Ioannidou. 2009. P-drop, D-drop, D-spread. In Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop in Greek Syntax and Semantics, MITWPL 571. 393–408.Google Scholar
Huyssteen, Gerard B. van. 2018. The hulle and goed constructions in Afrikaans. In Geert Booij (ed.), The construction of words. Studies in Morphology, vol. 4, 399–437. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kálmán, Béla. 1972. Hungarian historical phonology. In Loránd Benkő & Samu Imre (eds), The Hungarian language, 49–83. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2003. Silent years, silent hours. In Lars-Olof Delsing, Cecilia Falk, Gunlög Josefsson & Halldor Armann Sigurðsson (eds), Grammar in focus. Festschrift for Christer Platzack, Vol. 21, 209–226. Lund: Wallin & Dalholm.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 2000. Extraposition as parallel construal. Ms., University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò. 2019. Nouns & co. Converging evidence in the analysis of associative plurals. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 721. 603–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 2003. A semantic analysis of associative plurals. Studies in Language 271. 469–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1981. The development of the category of number in Tok Pisin. In Pieter Muysken (ed.), Generative studies in creole languages, 35–84. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2003. One, empty nouns, and θ-assignment. Linguistic Inquiry 341. 281–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rocquet, Amélie. 2013. Splitting objects: A nanosyntactic account of direct object marking. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ghent.
Simonyi, Zsigmond. 1895. Tüzetes magyar nyelvtan [A thorough Hungarian grammar]. Budapest: MTA.Google Scholar
Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy. 2000. The phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar