Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Vol. 2:2 (2023) ► pp.214–241

Reported speech and its extensions in Beserman

ORCID logo | Universität Hamburg

This paper presents a descriptive account of reported speech, understood in terms of Spronck & Nikitina (2019), in Beserman (Uralic > Permic). Two phenomena are described in particular. First, it is demonstrated that, although Beserman generally prefers the direct speech strategy, the interpretation of indexicals in certain contexts may be affected by pragmatic factors. Second, Beserman allows for agreement mismatch between the subject and the predicate of the reported clause, known as “monstrous agreement”. This phenomenon has not been attested in Permic languages before. Apart from that, extended uses of two Beserman reported speech markers are described, whereby they convey pragmatic meanings that resemble English kind of or like. This semantic development reverses a well-known grammaticalization path that turns such pragmatic elements into reported speech markers. The study is based on both corpus and elicited data.

Keywords: reported speech, pragmatics, indexicals, monstrous agreement, Beserman, Udmurt
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Reported speech markers
  • 3.Interpretation of indexicals and pragmatics
  • 4.Agreement mismatch
  • 5.Pragmatic uses of reported speech markers
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00019.ark
References
Agyagási, Klára
2012 Language contact in the Volga-Kama area. Studia Uralo-altaica 491. 21–37.Google Scholar
Andersen, Gisle
1998 The pragmatic marker like from a Relevance-theoretic perspective. In Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds.), Pragmatics & beyond: New series, vol. 571, 147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Ingrid van Alphen
2012 Preface: Introductory remarks on new and old quotatives. In Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (eds.), Quotatives: cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives (Converging evidence in language and communication research, vol. 15), xi–xxx. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia
2013 The evolution of three pragmatic markers: As it were, so to speak/say and if you like . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 141. 161–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael & Jeff Good
2013 Languoid, doculect and glossonym: Formalizing the notion ‘language.’ Language Documentation and Conservation 71. 331–359.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Lieven Vandelanotte
2011 Tense use in direct and indirect speech in English. Journal of Pragmatics 431. 236–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dömötör, Adrienne
2015 A mondván és az úgymond: diskurzusjelölő elemek keletkezése idéző szerkezetekből [ Mondván and úgymond: The emergence of discourse markers from quoting constructions]. Magyar Nyelv 1111. 21–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2013 Some problems in the typology of quotation: a canonical approach. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 66–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ganenkov, Dmitry
2016 Eccentric agreement can be monstrous. Presented at the 39th GLOW Conference, Göttingen, April 5–8, 2016.
Güldemann, Tom
2008 Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology [EALT]). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Thetic speaker-instantiating quotative indexes as a cross-linguistic type. In Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (eds.), Quotatives: cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives (Converging evidence in language and communication research, vol. 15), 117–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002 World lexicon of grammaticalization. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David
1989 Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karpova, Lyudmila
2013 Leksika severnogo narechija udmurtskogo jazyka [Vocabulary of the Northern dialect of the Udmurt language]. Izhevsk: Izdatel’stvo Udmurtskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Kasenov, Daniar
2021 Indexical shift and monstrous agreement in Balkar. Presented at the 18th Conference on Typology and Grammar for Young Scholars, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Kelmakov, Valentin
1998 Kratkij kurs udmurtskoj dialektologii [A brief course on Udmurt dialectology]. Izhevsk: Izdatel’stvo Udmurtskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Khachaturyan, Elizaveta
2020 Marqueurs discursifs du dire (français, russe, norvégien): Des sémantiques lexicales différentes pour des stratégies énonciatives similaires? [Discursive markers of “say” (French, Russian, Norwegian): Different lexical semantics for similar speech strategies?]. Corela (HS-31). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibardina, Tatyana
2012 Sredstva vyrazhenija modal’nosti v udmurtskom jazyke [Means of expression of modality in Udmurt]. Mozhga: Udmurtskij universitet.Google Scholar
Kirillova, Lyudmila
(ed.) 2008 Udmurtsko-russkij slovar’: Ok. 50000 slov [Udmurt–Russian dictionary: ca. 50,000 headwords]. Izhevsk: Izdatel’stvo Udmurtskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Klumpp, Gerson
2016 Semantic functions of complementizers in Permic languages. In Kasper Boye & Petar Kehayov (eds.), Complementizer semantics in European languages (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 57), 529–586. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolyaseva, Alena
2021 The divergent paths of pragmaticalization: The case of the Russian particles tipa and vrode . Journal of Pragmatics 2011. 181–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
2002 The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London / New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lytkin, Vasiliy
1962 Komi-Jaz’vinskij dialekt [Yazva Komi dialect]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
1964 Istoricheskij vokalizm permskix jazykov [Historical vocalism of the Permic languages]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Matić, Dejan & Brigitte Pakendorf
2013 Non-canonical SAY in Siberia: Areal and genealogical patterns. Studies in Language 371. 356–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Messick, Troy
2017 The morphosyntax of self-ascription: A cross-linguistic study. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Nikitina, Tatiana
2012 Personal deixis and reported discourse: Towards a typology of person alignment. Linguistic Typology 161. 233–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Podobryaev, Alexander
2014 Persons, imposters, and monsters. PhD dissertation, MIT. [URL]
Schlenker, Philippe
2003 A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 261. 29–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serdobolskaya, Natalia & Svetlana Toldova
2010 Grammaticalization of the verb of speech in Finno-Ugric languages. In Congressus XI Internationalis Finno-Ugristarum. Pars VI: Dissertationes symposiorum ad linguisticam. Piliscsaba: Reguly Társaság.
2014 Glagol rechi manaš v marijskom jazyke: osobennosti grammatikalizacii [The verb of speaking manaš in the Mari language: Peculiarities of grammaticalization]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 61. 66–91.Google Scholar
Skribnik, Elena
2022 Clause combining. In Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso, and Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Uralic languages, 996–1017. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorvacheva, V.
(ed.) 1961 Sravnitel’nyj slovar’ komi-zyrjanskix dialektov [Comparative dictionary of Komi-Zyrian dialects]. Syktyvkar: Komi knizhnoe izdatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Spronck, Stef & Daniela Casartelli
2021 In a manner of speaking: How reported speech may have shaped grammar. Frontiers in Communication 61. 624486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spronck, Stef & Tatiana Nikitina
2019 Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology 231. 119–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sundaresan, Sandhya
2011 A plea for syntax and a return to first principles: monstrous agreement in Tamil. In Proceedings of SALT 21 1, 674–693. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tánczos, Orsolya
2013  Hogy ... hogy? Kettős kötőszók az udmurt mondatban [ That... that? Double conjunctions in the Udmurt sentence]. In Klára Agyagási, Attila Hegedűs & Katalin É. Kiss (eds.), Nyelvelmélet és kontaktológia 2 1., 95–112. Piliscsaba: PPKE BTK Magyar Nyelvészeti Tanszék.Google Scholar
Teptiuk, Denys
2019 Quotative indexes in Finno-Ugric (Komi, Udmurt, Hungarian, Finnish and Estonian). Tartu University. [URL]
2021 Self-quotative markers in Permic and Hungarian. Linguistica Uralica 571. 213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teptiuk, Denys & Johannes Hirvonen
2021 Perspective shift in reported discourse of Finno-Ugric languages. Presented at 54th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Athens, August 31 – September 3, 2021.
Tyshkevich, Natalia
2014 Kosvennaja rech’ v besermjanskom dialekte udmurtskogo jazyka [Indirect speech in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt]. Presented at the 2nd Workshop on Beserman and Mari studies, Moscow, February 28, 2014.
Usacheva, Maria, Timofey Arkhangelskiy, Olga Biryuk, Vladimir Ivanov & Ruslan Idrisov
2017 Tezaurus besermjanskogo narechija: Imena i sluzhebnye chasti rechi (govor derevni Shamardan) [Thesaurus of the Beserman supradialect: Nominals and functional parts of speech (Shamardan village variety)]. Moscow: Izdatel’skie reshenija.Google Scholar
Usacheva, Maria N.
2021 Dialogue-focused experiments in the field: Advantages and disadvantages (a Permic experience). In Tatiana B. Agranat & Leyli R. Dodykhudoeva (eds.), Strategies for knowledge elicitation, 27–62. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vakhrushev, Vasiliy, V. Zakharov & L. Kalinina
1974 Grammatika sovremennogo udmurtskogo jazyka. Sintaksis slozhnogo predlozhenija [Grammar of contemporary Udmurt. Syntax of the complex sentence]. Izhevsk: Udmurtskij NII istorii, ekonomiki, literatury i jazyka.Google Scholar
Van der Houwen, Fleur
2012 The effect of genre on reporting speech: conversations and newspaper articles. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 11. 101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Eberhard
2011 Udmurtische Grammatik [Udmurt grammar] (Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 81). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Zakirova, Aygul & Alexey Kozlov
2022 The emphatic identity particle =OK in the Volga-Kama Sprachbund. Presented at Congressus XIII Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, Vienna, August 21–26, 2022.
Zubova, Iuliia
2019 Variatsii v ispol’zovanii modal’nyx chastits v literaturnom udmurtskom jazyke i v besermjanskom dialekte [Variation in the use of modal particles in literary Udmurt and in the Beserman dialect]. Uralo-Altajskie issledovanija 41. 71–90.Google Scholar