Article published In:
Korean Linguistics
Vol. 17:1 (2015) ► pp.132
Allopenna, Paul D., James S. Magnuson & Michael K. Tanenhaus
1998Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models. Journal of Memory and Language 381: 419–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira
1990Accessing NP Antecedents. London, UK: Routledge Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer
1998Reference Form and Discourse Patterns. Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Badecker, William & Kath Straub
2002The Processing Role of Structural Constraints on the Interpretation of Pronouns and Anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 281: 748–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler & Ben Bolker
2012Linear Mixed-effects Models using S4 Classes. CRAN.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2005Binding Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Sun
1977Korean Reflexive Pronoun caki and its Referent NP’s Point of View. Language Research 131: 35–48.Google Scholar
Cho, Mi-Hui
1994On the Orientation Problem in Korean ‘caki’ Binding and the Typology of X Reflexive Binding. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 191: 165–183.Google Scholar
Clements, George N
1975The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse. Journal of West African Languages 101: 141–177.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Gabriella Hermon & C.-T. James Huang
2001Long-distance Reflexives: The State of the Art. Syntax and Semantics: Long-distance Reflexives ed. by Peter Cole, Gabriella Hermon & C.-T. James Huang, Vol. 331, xiii–xlvii. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Gabriella Hermon & Li-May Sung
1990Principles and Parameters of Long-distance Reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 211: 1–22.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter & Li-May Sung
1994Head Movement and Long-distance Reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 251: 355–406.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robin M
1974The Control of Eye Fixation by the Meaning of Spoken Language: A New Methodology for the Real-time Investigation of Speech Perception, Memory and Language Processing. Cognitive Psychology 61: 84–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culy, Christopher
1997Logophoric Pronouns and Point of View. Linguistics 351: 845–959. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahan, Delphine & Michael K. Tanenhaus
2004Continuous Mapping from Sound to Meaning in Spoken-language Comprehension: Immediate Effects of Verb-based Thematic Constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 301: 498–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gill, Kook-Hee
1999The Long-distance Anaphora Conspiracy: The Case of Korean. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium ed. by Jim Alexander, Na-Rae Han & Michelle Minnick Fox, Vol. 6.11 of U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics , 171–183. Philadelphia: Penn Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars
1988Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermon, Gabriella
1992Binding Theory and Parameter Setting. The Linguistic Review 91: 145–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James & C.-S. Luther Liu
2001Logophoricity, Attitudes, and ziji at the Interface. Long Distance Reflexives ed. by P. Cole, G. Hermon & C.-T.J. Huang, Vol. 331 of Syntax and Semantics , 141–195. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Joo, Keum-Jeong
2014Children’s Interpretation of the Korean Reflextive Pronouns caki and caki-casin . Doctoral Dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.
Kaiser, Elsi, Jeffrey T. Runner, Rachel S. Sussman & Michael K. Tanenhaus
2009Structural and Semantic Constraints on the Resolution of Pronouns and Reflexives. Cognition 1121: 55–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, Beom-Mo
2001The Grammar and Use of Korean Reflexives. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 61: 134–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Ji-Hye, Silvina Montrul & James Yoon
2009Binding Interpretation of Anaphors by Korean Heritage Speakers. Language Acquisition 161: 3–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Soo-Yeon
2000Acceptability and Preference in the Interpretation of Anaphors. Linguistics 381: 315–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1987Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin
1973Abstract Syntax and Korean with Reference to English. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Indiana.
2003Contrastive Topic and/or Contrastive Focus. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12 ed. by William McClure. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Maryellen C., Neal J. Pearlmutter & Mark S. Seidenberg
1994The Lexical Nature of Syntactic ambiguity Resolution. Psychological Review 1011: 676–703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madigan, Sean
2006Exhaustive and Partial Control in Korean: Long-distance caki as an Overt Form of PRO. Havard Studies in Korean Linguistics XI ed. by Susumu Kuno, Ik-Hwan Lee, John Whitman, Joan Maling, Young-Se Kang, Peter Sells & Hyang-Sook Sohn, 642–655. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan
1984Non-clause-bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy 71: 211–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, William
1987The Interpretation of Korean Anaphora: The Role and Representation of Grammatical Relations. Language 631: 251–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Sung-Hyuk
1986Parametrizing the Theory of Binding: The Implications of caki in Korean. Language Research 221: 229–253.Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin
2006The Real-time Status of Island Phenomena. Language 821: 795–823. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pica, Pierre
1987On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle. Proceedings of NELS 17 ed. by Joyce McDonough & Bernadette Plunkett, Vol. 21, 483–499. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Eric Reuland
1993Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 241: 657–720.Google Scholar
Runner, Jeffrey T., Rachel S. Sussman & Michael K. Tanenhaus
2003Assignment of Reference to Reflexives and Pronouns in Picture Noun Phrases: Evidence from Eye Movements. Cognition B1–B13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Processing Reflexives and Pronouns in Picture Noun Phrases. Cognitive Science 301: 193–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schutze, Carson
2001On Korean ‘Case Stacking’: The Varied Functions of the Particles ka and lul . The Linguistic Review 181: 193–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sells, Peter
1987Aspects of Logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 181: 445–479.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldor Armann
1986Moods and (long-distance) Reflexives in Icelandic. In Working papers in Scandinavian syntax . Linguistics Department, University of Trondheim.
Sohn, Ho-Min
1999The Korean Language. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohng, Hong-Ki
2004A Minimalist Analysis of X0 Reflexivization in Chinese and Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar 141: 375–396.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, Michael K., Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton, Kathleen M. Eberhard & Julie C. Sedivy
1995Integration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension. Science 2681: 1632–1634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1992Long-distance Reflexives and the Typology of NPs. Long-distance anaphora ed. by Jan Koster & Eric Reuland, 49–75. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trueswell, John, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Susan M. Garnsey
1994Semantic Influences on Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Disambiguation. Journal of Memory and Language 331: 285–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Jeong-Me
1989Long-distance Anaphors in Korean and their Cross-linguistic Implications. Papers from the 25th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society ed. by Caroline Wiltshire, Randolph Graczyk & Music Bradley, 479–495. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne
1989Anaphor Binding and Narrative Point of View: English Reflexive Pronouns in Sentence and Discourse. Language 651: 695–727. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Abdollahnejad, Elias & Dennis Ryan Storoshenko
Kaiser, Elsi
2021. Anaphora: Experimental Methods for Investigating Coreference. In The Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Syntax,  pp. 278 ff. DOI logo
Sperlich, Darcy
2020. An Experimental Synthesis. In Reflexive Pronouns: A Theoretical and Experimental Synthesis [Language, Cognition, and Mind, 8],  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 february 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.