Cover not available
Article published In:
Korean Linguistics
Vol. 17:1 (2015) ► pp.33–77

Overriding syntactic islands with prosodically marked wh-scope in South Kyŏngsang Korean and two dialects of Japanese

| National Institue for Japanese Language and Linguistics

This article explores the effect of discourse context and prosody on the resolution of wh-scope ambiguity in Tokyo Japanese, Fukuoka Japanese, and South Kyŏngsang Korean. It focuses on wh-islands in particular. There is little consensus in the literature as to whether wh-island effects are present in Japanese or Korean (Huang 1982, Nishigauchi 1990, Lee 1982, Suh 1987, among others). A production study, in which a scope-ambiguous wh-interrogative was preceded by a disambiguating discourse context, demonstrates that speakers’ scope interpretation is consistent with the preceding discourse context. An additional comprehension study reveals that prosodic wh-scope marking observed in the languages studied improves the acceptability of the matrix scope readings in violation of wh-islands. The experimental results support the view that wh-island effects can be overridden by plausible discourse contexts as well as the appropriate prosodic marking of wh-scope. These results highlight the interaction of grammatical knowledge, contextual factors, and prosody.


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 15 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.17.1.02hwa
References
Abrusán, Márta
2011 Presuppositional and Negative Islands: A Semantic Account. Natural Language Semantics 191: 257–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altmann, Gerry & Mark Steedman
1988 Interaction with Context During Human Sentence Processing. Cognition 301: 191–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoshima, Sachiko, Colin Phillips, and Amy Weinberg
2003 Processing of Japanese Wh-scrambling Constructions. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12. Stanford, CA: CSLI publications.Google Scholar
Arnon, Inbal, Bruno Estigarribia, Philip Hofmeister, T. Florian Jaeger, Jeanette Pettibone, Ivan A. Sag & Neal Snider
2005 Rethinking Superiority Effects: A Processing Model. Poster presented at the CUNY Sentence Processing Conference , University of Arizona.
Baker, C.L
1970 Notes on the Description of English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Q Morpheme. Foundations of Language 61: 197–219.Google Scholar
Baltazani, Mary
2002 Quantifier Scope and the Role of Intonation in Greek. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Bard, Ellen Gurman, Dan Robertson & Antonella Sorace
1996 Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability. Language 721: 32–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W., Cynthia Breazeal & Linda B. Smith
2007 Cognition as Coordinated Noncognition. Cognitive Processing 81: 79–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choe, H.S
1995 Focus and Topic Movement in Korean and Licensing. Discourse Configurational Languages ed. by K.E. Kiss, 269–334. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1973 Conditions on Transformations. A Festschrift for Morris Halle ed. by Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1991 Types of A’ dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N
1984 Binding Domains in Kikuyu. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 141: 37–56.Google Scholar
Cowart, Wayne
1997 Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Mark Steedman
1985 On Not Being Led up the Garden Path: The Use of Context by the Psychological Parser. Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives ed. by Lauri Kartunnen, David Dowty & Arnold Zwicky, 320–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deguchi, Masanori & Yoshihisa Kitagawa
2002 Prosody and Wh-questions. Proceedings of NELS 32 ed. by Masako Hirotani, 73–92. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Elman, Jeffrey L., Elizabeth A. Bates, Mark H. Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Domenico Parisi & Kim Plunkett
1996 Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward
1998 Linguistic Complexity: Locality of Syntactic Dependencies. Cognition 68.1: 1–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 The Dependency Locality Theory: a distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. Image, Language, Brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium ed. by Alec Marantz, Yasushi Miyashita & Wayne O’Neil, 95–126. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Han, Hak-Sung
1992 Notes on Reflexive Movement. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11, 215–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John
1999 Processing Complexity and Filler-Gap Dependencies across Grammars. Language 75.2: 244–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayata, Teruhiro
1985 Hakata hougen no akusento·keitairon [The accent and morphology of the Hakata dialect]. Fukuoka: Kyushu University Press.Google Scholar
Hirose, Yuki & Yoshihisa Kitagawa
2007 Production and perception of Prosody-Scope Correlation in Wh-interrogatives. Presentation at Workshop on Prosody, Syntax and Information (WPSI) III . Indiana University.
Hirotani, Masako
2005 Prosody and LF Interpretation: Processing Japanese Wh- questions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Hofmeister, Philip & Ivan A. Sag
2010 Cognitive Constraints on Syntactic Islands. Language 861: 366–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh James
1982 Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Hwang, H.J
2007 Wh-Phrase Questions and Prosody in Korean. In Proceedings 17th JK Linguistic Conference .
Hwang, Hyun Kyung
2006 Intonation Patterns of Wh-interrogatives in South Kyungsang Korean and Fukuoka Japanese. Eoneohak, Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea 451: 39–59.Google Scholar
2009 The Role of Prosody and Pragmatics on Wh-scope Assignment in Korean and Japanese. Proceedings of CLS 45 .
2011a Scope, Prosody and Pitch Accent: the Prosodic Marking of Wh-Scope in Two Varieties of Japanese and South Kyeongsang Korean. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.
2011b The Interaction of Accent and wh-question intonation in Korean and Japanese. Language Research 47.1: 45–70.Google Scholar
2011c Distinct Types of Focus and Wh-question Intonation. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), 922–925.
2012 Wh-intonation and Information Structure in South Kyeongsang Korean and Tokyo Japanese. Information Structure: Contrasts and Positions ed. by A. Neeleman & Ivona Kucerova, 48–71. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, Shinichiro
2002 Invisible but Audible Wh-scope Marking: Wh-constructions and Deaccenting in Japanese. Proceedings of WCCFL 21, ed. by Line Mikkelsen & Christopher Potts, 180–193. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2003 Intonation and Interface Conditions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Jun, Sun-Ah & Mira Oh
1996 A Prosodic Analysis of Three Types of Wh-Phrases in Korean. Language and Speech 391: 37–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa
2005a Prosody, Syntax and Pragmatics of Wh-questions in Japanese. English Linguistics 22.2: 302–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005b Wh-scope Puzzles. In Proceedings of NELS 35, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa & Yuki Hirose
2012 Appeals to Prosody in Japanese Wh-interrogatives—Speakers’ Versus Listeners’ Strategies. Lingua 122.6: 608–641. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluender, Robert
1998 On the Distinction between Strong and Weak Islands: A Processing Perspective. Syntax and Semantics Volume 29: The Limits of Syntax ed. by Peter Culicover & Louise McNally, 241–279. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kluender, Robert & Marta Kutas
1993 Subjacency as a Processing Phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 81: 573–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubo, T
1989 Hukuoka-si hougen no, dare·nani tou no gimonsi o hukumu bun no pitti pataan [The pitch patterns of sentences containing WH-words in the Fukuoka City dialect]. Kokugogaku 1561: 1–12.Google Scholar
1990 Hukuoka-si hougen no gimonsi hyougen no akusento kisoku [Accent rules for WH expressions in the Fukuoka dialect.] Kyuudai gengogaku kenkyuusitu houkoku 111: 103–118.Google Scholar
1993 Flat High Pitch and the Scope of Wh-words. Study of languages and cultures of Asia and Africa 22 . Tokyo university of Foreign studies.
Kubozono, Haruo
1988 The Organization of Japanese Prosody. Ph.D. dissertation, Edinburgh University. [reprinted in 1993, Kurosio Publishers].
Kuno, Susumu
1987 Functional Syntax: Anaphora Discourse and Empathy. Chicago: IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kraljic, Tanya & Susan E. Brennan
2005 Prosodic Disambiguation of Syntactic Structure: For the Speaker or for the Addressee? Cognitive Psychology 50.2: 194–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
1980 The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Utpal
2002 Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito
1984 On the Nature of Proper Government. Linguistic Inquiry 151: 235–289.Google Scholar
1992 Move Alpha: Conditions on its Application and Output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lee, H.S
1982 Asymmetry in Island Constrains in Korean. ms., UCLA.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse
1973 Phonetic Disambiguation of Syntactic Ambiguity. Glossa 71: 107–122.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, Edson T. & Shoichi Takahashi
2002 The Processing of Wh-phrases and Interrogative Complementizers in Japanese. Japanese Korean Linguistics 10 ed. by Noriko Akatuka & Susan Strauss, 62–75. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Nagahara, Hiroyuki
1994 Phonological Phrasing in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Nagel, H. Nicholas, Lewis P. Shapiro, Betty Tuller & Rebecca Nawy
1996 Prosodic Influences on the Resolution of Temporary Ambiguity during On-line Sentence Processing. Journal of Psycholing-uistie Research 251: 315–340.Google Scholar
Nishigauchi, Taisuke
1990 Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Colin
2013 On the Nature of Island Constraints I: Language Processing and Reductionist Accounts. Experimental Syntax and Island Effects ed. by Jon Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Colin, Nina Kazanina, & Shani H. Abada
2005 ERP Effects of the Processing of Syntactic Long-distance Dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research 221: 407–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. & Mary Beckman
1988 Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Price, P.J., S. Ostendorf, S. Shattuck-Huffnagel, & C. Fong
1991 The Use of Prosody in Syntactic Disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91: 2956–2970. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richard, Norvin
2000 Wh-Island Effect in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 91: 187–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, Amy J., Shari R. Speer, Paul Warren & S. David White
2000 Intonational Disambiguation in Sentence Production and Comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 291: 169–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1984 Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 The Interaction of Constraints on Prosodic Phrasing. Prosody: Theory and Experiment ed. by M. Horne, 231–262. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson
1996 The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J
2010 Empirical Approaches to Fukuoka Japanese WH Prosody. Proceedings of FAJL 5 ed. by Ryan Bennett, Anie Thompson & Matthew Tucker, MITWPL.
Smith, Jennifer
2013 Fukuoka Japanese Wh Prosody in Production and Perception. Lingua 1241: 96–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spivy, Michael & Michael K. Tanenhaus
1998 Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in Discourse: Modeling the Effects of Referential Context and Lexical Frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 241: 1521–1543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugahara, Mariko
2003  Downtrends and Post-FOCUS Intonation in Tokyo Japanese . Ph.D dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Suh, C.M
1987 Gukeo Uimummum Eongu [ A study on Korean interrogatives ]. Tower Press.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
& Frans Zwarts 1993 Weak Islands and an Algebraic Semantics of Scope Taking. Natural Language Semantics 11: 235–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Daiko
1993 Movement of Wh-phrases in Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 111: 655–678. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Esther & B. Smith Linda
1994 A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi
1997 Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and LF Syntax. Handout from the LSA Summer Institute, Cornell University.
Venditti, Jennifer J
2000  Discourse Structure and Attentional Salience Effects on Japanese Intonation . Ph.D. Dissertation. The Ohio State University.
Warren, Tessa
& Edward Gibson 2002 The Influence of Referential Processing on Sentence Complexity. Cognition 851: 79–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Akira
1992 Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and Chain Formation, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2, Cambridge: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Wightman, Colin W., Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, Mari Ostendorf & Patti J. Price
1992 Segmental Durations in the Vicinity of Prosodic Phrase Boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 921: 1707–1717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, T
1998 Wh-operator vs. Yes/No-operator. ICU Language Research Bulletin 131: 159–172.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Yun, Weonhee
2021. A perceptual study of the wh-island constraint in Seoul Korean. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 13:2 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Yun, Weonhee
2022. Perceptual discrimination of wh-scopes in Gyeongsang Korean*. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 14:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yun, Weonhee
2023. Patterns of categorical perception and response times in the matrix scope interpretation of embedded wh-phrases in Gyeongsang Korean. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 15:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yun, Weonhee, Ki-tae Kim & Sunwoo Park
2020. A prosodic cue representing scopes of wh-phrases in Korean: Focusing on North Gyeongsang Korean*. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 12:3 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.