Cover not available
Article published In:
Korean Linguistics
Vol. 17:1 (2015) ► pp.33–77

Overriding syntactic islands with prosodically marked wh-scope in South Kyŏngsang Korean and two dialects of Japanese

| National Institue for Japanese Language and Linguistics

This article explores the effect of discourse context and prosody on the resolution of wh-scope ambiguity in Tokyo Japanese, Fukuoka Japanese, and South Kyŏngsang Korean. It focuses on wh-islands in particular. There is little consensus in the literature as to whether wh-island effects are present in Japanese or Korean (Huang 1982, Nishigauchi 1990, Lee 1982, Suh 1987, among others). A production study, in which a scope-ambiguous wh-interrogative was preceded by a disambiguating discourse context, demonstrates that speakers’ scope interpretation is consistent with the preceding discourse context. An additional comprehension study reveals that prosodic wh-scope marking observed in the languages studied improves the acceptability of the matrix scope readings in violation of wh-islands. The experimental results support the view that wh-island effects can be overridden by plausible discourse contexts as well as the appropriate prosodic marking of wh-scope. These results highlight the interaction of grammatical knowledge, contextual factors, and prosody.


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 15 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.17.1.02hwa
References
Abrusán, Márta
2011 Presuppositional and Negative Islands: A Semantic Account. Natural Language Semantics 191: 257–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altmann, Gerry & Mark Steedman
1988 Interaction with Context During Human Sentence Processing. Cognition 301: 191–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoshima, Sachiko, Colin Phillips, and Amy Weinberg
2003 Processing of Japanese Wh-scrambling Constructions. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12. Stanford, CA: CSLI publications.Google Scholar
Arnon, Inbal, Bruno Estigarribia, Philip Hofmeister, T. Florian Jaeger, Jeanette Pettibone, Ivan A. Sag & Neal Snider
2005 Rethinking Superiority Effects: A Processing Model. Poster presented at the CUNY Sentence Processing Conference , University of Arizona.
Baker, C.L
1970 Notes on the Description of English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Q Morpheme. Foundations of Language 61: 197–219.Google Scholar
Baltazani, Mary
2002 Quantifier Scope and the Role of Intonation in Greek. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Bard, Ellen Gurman, Dan Robertson & Antonella Sorace
1996 Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability. Language 721: 32–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W., Cynthia Breazeal & Linda B. Smith
2007 Cognition as Coordinated Noncognition. Cognitive Processing 81: 79–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choe, H.S
1995 Focus and Topic Movement in Korean and Licensing. Discourse Configurational Languages ed. by K.E. Kiss, 269–334. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1973 Conditions on Transformations. A Festschrift for Morris Halle ed. by Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1991 Types of A’ dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N
1984 Binding Domains in Kikuyu. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 141: 37–56.Google Scholar
Cowart, Wayne
1997 Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Mark Steedman
1985 On Not Being Led up the Garden Path: The Use of Context by the Psychological Parser. Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives ed. by Lauri Kartunnen, David Dowty & Arnold Zwicky, 320–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deguchi, Masanori & Yoshihisa Kitagawa
2002 Prosody and Wh-questions. Proceedings of NELS 32 ed. by Masako Hirotani, 73–92. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Elman, Jeffrey L., Elizabeth A. Bates, Mark H. Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Domenico Parisi & Kim Plunkett
1996 Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward
1998 Linguistic Complexity: Locality of Syntactic Dependencies. Cognition 68.1: 1–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 The Dependency Locality Theory: a distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. Image, Language, Brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium ed. by Alec Marantz, Yasushi Miyashita & Wayne O’Neil, 95–126. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Han, Hak-Sung
1992 Notes on Reflexive Movement. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11, 215–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John
1999 Processing Complexity and Filler-Gap Dependencies across Grammars. Language 75.2: 244–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayata, Teruhiro
1985 Hakata hougen no akusento·keitairon [The accent and morphology of the Hakata dialect]. Fukuoka: Kyushu University Press.Google Scholar
Hirose, Yuki & Yoshihisa Kitagawa
2007 Production and perception of Prosody-Scope Correlation in Wh-interrogatives. Presentation at Workshop on Prosody, Syntax and Information (WPSI) III . Indiana University.
Hirotani, Masako
2005 Prosody and LF Interpretation: Processing Japanese Wh- questions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Hofmeister, Philip & Ivan A. Sag
2010 Cognitive Constraints on Syntactic Islands. Language 861: 366–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh James
1982 Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Hwang, H.J
2007 Wh-Phrase Questions and Prosody in Korean. In Proceedings 17th JK Linguistic Conference .
Hwang, Hyun Kyung
2006 Intonation Patterns of Wh-interrogatives in South Kyungsang Korean and Fukuoka Japanese. Eoneohak, Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea 451: 39–59.Google Scholar
2009 The Role of Prosody and Pragmatics on Wh-scope Assignment in Korean and Japanese. Proceedings of CLS 45 .
2011a Scope, Prosody and Pitch Accent: the Prosodic Marking of Wh-Scope in Two Varieties of Japanese and South Kyeongsang Korean. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.
2011b The Interaction of Accent and wh-question intonation in Korean and Japanese. Language Research 47.1: 45–70.Google Scholar
2011c Distinct Types of Focus and Wh-question Intonation. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), 922–925.
2012 Wh-intonation and Information Structure in South Kyeongsang Korean and Tokyo Japanese. Information Structure: Contrasts and Positions ed. by A. Neeleman & Ivona Kucerova, 48–71. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, Shinichiro
2002 Invisible but Audible Wh-scope Marking: Wh-constructions and Deaccenting in Japanese. Proceedings of WCCFL 21, ed. by Line Mikkelsen & Christopher Potts, 180–193. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2003 Intonation and Interface Conditions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Jun, Sun-Ah & Mira Oh
1996 A Prosodic Analysis of Three Types of Wh-Phrases in Korean. Language and Speech 391: 37–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa
2005a Prosody, Syntax and Pragmatics of Wh-questions in Japanese. English Linguistics 22.2: 302–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005b Wh-scope Puzzles. In Proceedings of NELS 35, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa & Yuki Hirose
2012 Appeals to Prosody in Japanese Wh-interrogatives—Speakers’ Versus Listeners’ Strategies. Lingua 122.6: 608–641. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluender, Robert
1998 On the Distinction between Strong and Weak Islands: A Processing Perspective. Syntax and Semantics Volume 29: The Limits of Syntax ed. by Peter Culicover & Louise McNally, 241–279. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kluender, Robert & Marta Kutas
1993 Subjacency as a Processing Phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 81: 573–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubo, T
1989 Hukuoka-si hougen no, dare·nani tou no gimonsi o hukumu bun no pitti pataan [The pitch patterns of sentences containing WH-words in the Fukuoka City dialect]. Kokugogaku 1561: 1–12.Google Scholar
1990 Hukuoka-si hougen no gimonsi hyougen no akusento kisoku [Accent rules for WH expressions in the Fukuoka dialect.] Kyuudai gengogaku kenkyuusitu houkoku 111: 103–118.Google Scholar
1993 Flat High Pitch and the Scope of Wh-words. Study of languages and cultures of Asia and Africa 22 . Tokyo university of Foreign studies.
Kubozono, Haruo
1988 The Organization of Japanese Prosody. Ph.D. dissertation, Edinburgh University. [reprinted in 1993, Kurosio Publishers].
Kuno, Susumu
1987 Functional Syntax: Anaphora Discourse and Empathy. Chicago: IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kraljic, Tanya & Susan E. Brennan
2005 Prosodic Disambiguation of Syntactic Structure: For the Speaker or for the Addressee? Cognitive Psychology 50.2: 194–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
1980 The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Utpal
2002 Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito
1984 On the Nature of Proper Government. Linguistic Inquiry 151: 235–289.Google Scholar
1992 Move Alpha: Conditions on its Application and Output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lee, H.S
1982 Asymmetry in Island Constrains in Korean. ms., UCLA.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse
1973 Phonetic Disambiguation of Syntactic Ambiguity. Glossa 71: 107–122.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, Edson T. & Shoichi Takahashi
2002 The Processing of Wh-phrases and Interrogative Complementizers in Japanese. Japanese Korean Linguistics 10 ed. by Noriko Akatuka & Susan Strauss, 62–75. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Nagahara, Hiroyuki
1994 Phonological Phrasing in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Nagel, H. Nicholas, Lewis P. Shapiro, Betty Tuller & Rebecca Nawy
1996 Prosodic Influences on the Resolution of Temporary Ambiguity during On-line Sentence Processing. Journal of Psycholing-uistie Research 251: 315–340.Google Scholar
Nishigauchi, Taisuke
1990 Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Colin
2013 On the Nature of Island Constraints I: Language Processing and Reductionist Accounts. Experimental Syntax and Island Effects ed. by Jon Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Colin, Nina Kazanina, & Shani H. Abada
2005 ERP Effects of the Processing of Syntactic Long-distance Dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research 221: 407–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. & Mary Beckman
1988 Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Price, P.J., S. Ostendorf, S. Shattuck-Huffnagel, & C. Fong
1991 The Use of Prosody in Syntactic Disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91: 2956–2970. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richard, Norvin
2000 Wh-Island Effect in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 91: 187–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, Amy J., Shari R. Speer, Paul Warren & S. David White
2000 Intonational Disambiguation in Sentence Production and Comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 291: 169–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1984 Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 The Interaction of Constraints on Prosodic Phrasing. Prosody: Theory and Experiment ed. by M. Horne, 231–262. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson
1996 The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J
2010 Empirical Approaches to Fukuoka Japanese WH Prosody. Proceedings of FAJL 5 ed. by Ryan Bennett, Anie Thompson & Matthew Tucker, MITWPL.
Smith, Jennifer
2013 Fukuoka Japanese Wh Prosody in Production and Perception. Lingua 1241: 96–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spivy, Michael & Michael K. Tanenhaus
1998 Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in Discourse: Modeling the Effects of Referential Context and Lexical Frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 241: 1521–1543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugahara, Mariko
2003  Downtrends and Post-FOCUS Intonation in Tokyo Japanese . Ph.D dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Suh, C.M
1987 Gukeo Uimummum Eongu [ A study on Korean interrogatives ]. Tower Press.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
& Frans Zwarts 1993 Weak Islands and an Algebraic Semantics of Scope Taking. Natural Language Semantics 11: 235–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, Daiko
1993 Movement of Wh-phrases in Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 111: 655–678. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Esther & B. Smith Linda
1994 A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi
1997 Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and LF Syntax. Handout from the LSA Summer Institute, Cornell University.
Venditti, Jennifer J
2000  Discourse Structure and Attentional Salience Effects on Japanese Intonation . Ph.D. Dissertation. The Ohio State University.
Warren, Tessa
& Edward Gibson 2002 The Influence of Referential Processing on Sentence Complexity. Cognition 851: 79–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Akira
1992 Wh-in-situ, Subjacency, and Chain Formation, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2, Cambridge: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Wightman, Colin W., Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, Mari Ostendorf & Patti J. Price
1992 Segmental Durations in the Vicinity of Prosodic Phrase Boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 921: 1707–1717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, T
1998 Wh-operator vs. Yes/No-operator. ICU Language Research Bulletin 131: 159–172.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Yun, Weonhee
2021. A perceptual study of the wh-island constraint in Seoul Korean. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 13:2 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
2022. Perceptual discrimination of wh-scopes in Gyeongsang Korean*. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 14:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yun, Weonhee, Ki-tae Kim & Sunwoo Park
2020. A prosodic cue representing scopes of wh-phrases in Korean: Focusing on North Gyeongsang Korean*. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 12:3 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.