Article published In:
Honorific language and linguistic politeness in Korean
Edited by John Whitman and Lucien Brown
[Korean Linguistics 17:2] 2015
► pp. 207241
References
Brown, Lucien
2010Observations on Korean and Japanese Speech Style Shifting. Journal of Korean Culture 141.65–102.Google Scholar
2011Korean Honorifics and ‘Revealed,’ ‘Ignored,’ and ‘Suppressed’ Aspects of Korean Culture and Politeness. Politeness Across Cultures ed. by F. Bargiela-Chiappini & Dániel Z. Kádár, 106–127. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Teaching ‘Casual’ and/or ‘Impolite’ Language Through Multimedia: The Case of Non-honorific Panmal Speech Styles in Korean. Language, Culture and Curriculum 26:1.1–18.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman
1960The Pronoun of Power and Solidarity. Styles in Language ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 253–276. New York: Technology Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko Minegishi
1996Japanese Language Socialization: Indexing the Modes of Self. Discourse Processes 221.171–197.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999Situational Meanings of Japanese Social Deixis: The Mixed Use of the Masu and Plain Forms. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 8:1.87–110.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Cynthia D.
1999Public and Private Voiced: Japanese Style Shifting and the Display of Affective Intensity. In The languages of Sentiment ed. by Gary Palmer & Debra Occhi, 107–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Pragmatic Functions of Humble Forms in Japanese Ceremonial Discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15:2.213–238.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ikuta, Shoko
1983Speech Level Shift and Conversational Strategy in Japanese Discourse. Language Sciences 51.37–54.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jung, Heeyoung
2014Does It Sound Rude?: Style Shift to –e/a or –ta Forms in Korean and to Naked Plain Forms in Japanese. Paper presented at the Annual American Association of Teachers of Korean conference . Boston University. June 20, 2014.
Kim-Renaud, Young-Key
2009Korean: An Essential Grammar. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
Lee, Kiri & Young-mee Yu Cho
Lee, Jeong-bok
1999Kwuke kyengepep-uy cenlakcek yongpep-ey tayhaye. [On the Strategic Usage of Korean Honorifics]. Language Research 35:1.91–121.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K.
1997Japanese Communication: Language and Thought in Context. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morford, Janet
1997Social Indexicality in French Pronominal Address. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7:1.3–37.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko
2008Speech Style and the Use of Regional (Yamaguchi) and Standard Japanese in Conversations. Style Shifting in Japanese ed. by Kimberly Jones & Tsuyoshi Ono, 230–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamines.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Mi Yung
2012Teachers’ Use of the Intimate Speech Style in the Korean Language Classroom. The Korean Language in America 171.55–83.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1990The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min
1999The Korean Language. The Cambridge Language Surveys.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1992The Uses and Utility of Ideology: Some Reflections. Pragmatics 2:3.311–323.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life. Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium about Language and Soceity-Austin [SALSA] ed. by Risako Ide, Rebecca Parker, & Yukako Sunaoshi, 266–295. Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
2003Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life. Language and Communication 231.193–229.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Susan & Jong Oh Eun
2005Indexicality and Honorific Level Choice in Korean. Linguistics 43:3.611–651.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Susan & Jhu Hyoung Youn
2011The Emergent Construction of Interpersonal Closeness and Distance in Problem-Solution Television Programs. Korean Language in America 151.62–82.Google Scholar
Yoo, Song-young
1994Kwuke Chengca taewupep-uy him-kwa yutae [Power and Solidarity in Korean Addressee Honorification]. Kwukehak 241 [Korean Linguistics]. 291–317.Google Scholar
Yoon, Sangseok
2010Situational Meanings and Functions of Korean Speech Styles. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Hawai’i.
2015Korean Honorifics Beyond Politeness Markers: Change of Footing through Shifting of Speech Style. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness ed. by Marina Terkourafi, 97–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Jo, Jaehyun
2018. Korean ‘Formality’ endings ‘-supnita/-supnikka’ and ‘-eyo’ in the negotiation of interactional identity in the news interview. Journal of Pragmatics 136  pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
Johfre, Sasha & Aliya Saperstein
2023. The Social Construction of Age: Concepts and Measurement. Annual Review of Sociology 49:1  pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Kim, HwanHee
2022. Corpus-based analysis of honorifics in Korean and its pedagogical implication. Korean Linguistics 18:2  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Jeong-Young
Kim, Minju
2023. Between honorifics and non-honorifics: A study of the Korean semi-honorific style and a comparison with Japanese. Discourse Studies 25:5  pp. 664 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Minju & Susan Strauss
2018. Emergent multiplicities of self- and other-construction in Korean workplace-based television dramas. Journal of Pragmatics 137  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Jiyoon & Lucien Brown
2022. Honorifics in the marketplace. Korean Linguistics 18:1  pp. 76 ff. DOI logo
Milak, Eldin
2022. “Call me by my name”: Names, address, and the subjectivization of Korean women. Language & Communication 85  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 january 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.