Article published in:
Korean Linguistics
Vol. 18:1 (2022) ► pp. 76–119

Honorifics in the marketplace

A multimodal indexical analysis

| Washington University in St. Louis
| Monash University
This paper analyzes how vendors and customers in Korean marketplaces use three distinct levels of addressee honorifics: the deferential ‑supnita style, the polite ‑yo style and the so-called panmal ‘half speech’ style. The frequencies of these forms to some extent pattern with the relative ages of the participants; for example, vendors are more likely to use panmal towards customers who are relatively younger. However, the majority of interactions feature dynamic variation between different styles, which cannot be adequately explained by relative age. Rather, we see that participants use ‑supnita style and ‑yo to index that they are speaking in their prescribed roles as “vendors” or “customers”. Meanwhile, panmal was found to index two main forms of social meaning. It was used to mark stages of the interaction that were conversational, playful, or intimate, but also when speakers strategically indexed their authority or power as they tried to take the upper hand in price negotiations. This authoritative use of panmal was accompanied by non-verbal behaviors such as large body postures, high chin positions and the withholding of gaze and bodily orientation. The paper contributes towards a growing body of research adopting an indexical approach to the use of honorifics, and demonstrates the importance of including analysis of multimodal features alongside the honorific forms themselves.
Keywords: multimodality, indexicality, honorifics, marketplace, speech-styles, Panmal, Contaymal
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Indexical properties of Korean honorifics
    • 2.1Overview
    • 2.2The deferential style
    • 2.3-yo
    • 2.4 Panmal
    • 2.5Other verbal and non-verbal features
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Analysis
  • 4.Data presentation
    • 4.1Quantitative overview
    • 4.2Qualitative analysis
      • 4.2.1–supnita
      • 4.2.2-yo
      • 4.2.3 Panmal
  • 5.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 28 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.20007.lee
References
Barke, Andrew
2010 Manipulating honorifics in the construction of social identities in Japanese television drama. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14(4). 456–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan
1994 Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek
2008 Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lucien
2011 Korean Honorifics and Politeness in Second Language Learning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a “Mind your own esteemed business”: Sarcastic Honorifics Use and Impoliteness in Korean TV Dramas. Journal of Politeness Research, 9(2). 159–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b “Oppa, hold my purse”: A Sociocultural Study of Identity and Indexicality in the Perception and Use of Oppa ‘Older Brother’ by Second Language Learners. The Korean Language in America, 181. 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013c Teaching ‘Casual’ and/or ‘Impolite’ Language through Multimedia: The Case of Non-Honorific Panmal Speech Styles in Korean. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26(1). 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Revisiting “polite” –yo and “deferential” –supnita speech style shifting in Korean from the viewpoint of indexicality. Journal of Pragmatics, 791. 43–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lucien and Pilar Prieto
2017 (Im) politeness: Prosody and gesture. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Daniel Kadar, eds., 357–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lucien and Bodo Winter
2019 Multimodal indexicality in Korean: “Doing deference” and “performing intimacy” through nonverbal behavior. Journal of Politeness Research, 15(1). 25–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Kyung-Hee
1995 Kwuke yangthay pemcwu-uy selceng-kwa ku cheykyey. Ene (Korean Journal of Linguistics), 201. 191–205.Google Scholar
Choo, Miho
2006 The Structure and Use of Korean Honorifics. In Sohn, ed., 132–154.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko
2011 Are honorifics polite? Uses of referent honorifics in a Japanese committee meeting. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (15). 3655–3672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 A scientist or salesman? Identity construction through referent honorifics on a Japanese shopping channel program. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 32 (2). 177–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2005 Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1). 35–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Haugh, Michael & Kadar, Daniel
2017 The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Cynthia
1999 Public and private voices: Japanese style shifting and the display of affective intensity. In Gary Palmer and Debra Occhi, eds., 107–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Information structure and discourse stance in a monologic “public speaking” register of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7). 1890–1911. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eun, Jong-oh and Susan Strauss
2004 The primacy of information status in the alternation between deferential and polite forms in Korean public discourse. Language Sciences, 261. 251–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
George, Johnny
2011 Politeness in Japanese Sign Language (JSL): Polite JSL expression as evidence for intermodal language contact influence. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.
Geyer, Naomi
2013 Discernment and variation: The actionoriented use of Japanese addressee honorifics. Multilingua, 32(2). 155–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2010 Jocular mockery and face in Anglo-Australian interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 42(8). 2106–2119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Juck-ryoon
1990 “Deference” versus “politeness” in Korean speech. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 821: Aspects of Korean Sociolinguistics. 41–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jo, Jaehyun
2018 Korean ‘Formality’endings ‘–supnita/–supnikka’and ‘–eyo’in the negotiation of interactional identity in the news interview. Journal of Pragmatics, 1361. 20–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Minju
1998 Cross-adoption of language between different genders: The case of the Korean kinship terms hyeng and enni . Proceedings from the Fifth Berkeley Women and Communication Conference, 271–284. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie
2010 A high boundary tone as a resource for a social action: The Korean sentence-ender–ta. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11). 3055–3077. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Soung-U.
2013 Language attitudes on Jeju Island – an analysis of attitudes towards language choice from an ethnographic perspective. London: SOAS (University of London) dissertation.
Kim, Eun Hye
2006 Hankwuke senemal emi ‘-si-’uy samwul contay kinung: paykhwacem, tayhyengmathu, caylaysicang phanmaywen-uy palhwa-lul cwungsim-ulo [The inanimate object function of Korean verb ending ‘-si-’: focussing on the utterances of sales personnel in department store, supermarkets and markets]. Sahoyenehak [The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korean] 24(1). 91–113.Google Scholar
2006 Hankwuke senemal emi ‘-si-’uy samwul contay kinung: paykhwacem, tayhyengmathu, caylaysicang phanmaywen-uy palhwa-lul cwungsim-ulo [The inanimate object function of Korean verb ending ‘-si-’: focussing on the utterances of sales personnel in department store, supermarkets and markets]. Sahoyenehak [Sociolinguistics] 24(1). 91–113.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Jin and Douglas Biber
1994 A corpus-based analysis of register variation in Korean. In Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan, eds., 45–70.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun and Kyung-Hee Suh
2007 Style shift in Korean pedagogical discourse. Sahoyenehak [The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korean], 15(2). 1–29.Google Scholar
King, Ross and Jaehoon Yeon
2000 Elementary Korean. Boston, Mass: Tuttle.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang
1999 A discourse-pragmatic analysis of the committal-ci in Korean: A synthetic approach to the form-meaning relation. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(2). 243–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Chang Soo
2000 A Frame-based analysis of Korean talk shows. Ene-wa Enehak [Language and Linguistics], 251, 177–197.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang
1991 Tense, aspect and modality: A discourse pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological perspective. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
Lee, Jungbok
2010 Sanghwang cwuchey nophim ‘-si-’ uy hwaksan-kwa paykyeng [The Diffusion of Honorific Ending ‘ -si-’ for the Situation Subject and its Backgrounds]. Enekwahakyenkwu [The Journal of Linguistic Science] 551. 217–246.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung-bok
2001 Kwuke kyengepep sayong-uy cenlyakcek thukseng (The Characteristics of the Strategic Use of Korean Honorifics). Seoul: Thaehaksa.Google Scholar
Lee, Keunyoung
2020 Impoliteness, identity and power in Korean: Critical discourse analysis and perception study of impoliteness. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon PhD dissertation.
Lee, Kiri and Young-mee Yu Cho
2015 Social meanings of honorific/non-honorific alternations in Korean and Japanese. Korean Linguistics, 17(2). 207–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Iksop and S. Robert Ramsey
2000 The Korean Language. Albany, NY: Suny Press.Google Scholar
Lukoff, Fred
1982 An Introductory Course in Korean. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel
1992 A Reference Grammar of Korean: A Complete Guide to the Grammar and History of the Korean language. Boston, Mass: Tuttle.Google Scholar
Mason, Paul, Juan Domínguez, Bodo Winter and Andrea Grignolio
2015 Hidden in plain view: degeneracy in complex systems. Biosystems, 1281. 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
1993 Constructing Social Identity: A Language Socialization Perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(3). 287–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko
1998 The use and non-use of honorifics in sales talk in Kyoto and Osaka: Are they rude or friendly. Japanese/Korean Linguistics, 71. 141–157.Google Scholar
Palmer, Gary and Debra Occhi
2010 The Languages of Sentiment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, Yong-Yae
1998 A discourse analysis of the Korean connective ketun in conversation. Crossroads of Language, Interaction, and Culture, 11. 71–89.Google Scholar
Park, Mi Yung
2012 Teachers’ use of the intimate speech style in the korean language classroom. Korean Language in America, 171. 55–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Alex, Lucien Brown and Bodo Winter
2018 Complex coordination: How power dynamics and task demands shape interpersonal motor synchrony. Paper presented at CogSci 2018, Madison, WI.
Raymond, Chase Wesley
2016 Linguistic reference in the negotiation of identity and action: Revisiting the T/V distinction. Language, 92(3). 636–670. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sherr-Ziarko, Ethan
2018 Prosodic properties of formality in conversational Japanese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 49(3). 331–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
2003 Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23(3–4). 193–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min
2006 Korean Language in Culture and Society. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Susan and Jong-oh Eun
2005 Indexicality and honorific speech level choice in Korean. Linguistics, 43(3). 611–651. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suh, Cheong-soo
1984 Contaypep yenkwu. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Sung, Ky-chull
1985 Hyentay taywupep yenkwu (Research on Contemporary Honorifics). Seoul: Kaymwunsa.Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo and Sven Grawunder
2012 The phonetic profile of Korean formality. Journal of Phonetics, 401. 808–815. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Bodo, Paula Pérez-Sobrino and Lucien Brown
2019 The sound of soft alcohol. PLOS ONE, 14(8). e0220449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Kyung-joo
2004 “Not just words: Korean social modes and the use of honorifics.” Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(2). 189–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Sangseok
2010 Situational Meanings and Functions of Korean Speech Styles. Manoa, Hawaii: University of Hawaii dissertation.
Yoon, Sang-Seok
2015 Korean honorifics beyond politeness markers. In Marina Terkourafi (Ed.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness, 97–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Honorifics in the marketplace