Cover not available
Article published In:
Korean Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2023) ► pp.59–87

“What’s your name?”

Frame mismatch and role of identification in problematic calls made to the Korean emergency center

ORCID logo | Sungkyunkwan University

This study investigates the role of identification and frame mismatch in Korean telephone call openings using conversation analysis on a series of problematic telephone calls made to the emergency center from a Korean governor (Moon-Soo, Kim) in 2011. Close examination of the problematic interaction indicates how delivering emergency care as a public service may evolve into a dispute in the Korean cultural context of kwandungsengmyeng (“identifying oneself by official status”). A mismatch between frames (Tracy, 1997) can be identified when the governor asks for the name of the answerer instead of presenting the reason for the call. Comparable examples from Korean conversational telephone calls are noted in which the answerer provides their name in the opening moments of the interaction, thereby depicting a strong expectation for identification and recognition in Korean openings. This paper argues that the governor’s actions can be explained by a mismatch between the public and private frames in relation to identification practices. The study findings may highlight the important role that identification and recognition plays in Korean culture and suggest methods through which future problematic emergency calls can be prevented.

Keywords: emergency call openings, frame mismatch, identification, Korean, problematic calls, OT
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Emergency call openings and problematic police citizen exchanges
  • 3.Identification-recognition in cross-cultural telephone call openings
  • 4.Data and methodology
  • 5.The Governor Kim call and public reaction to the incident
  • 6.The analysis
    • 6.1Frame mismatch: 119 call openings vs. ordinary telephone call openings
    • 6.2The dispute: Asking for another’s name vs. problem query
  • 7.Discussion and conclusion
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 8 June 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.22002.par
References
Ahn, J-Y.
2021, November 14. Minjudang, “Lee Jaemyung, Kim Moon-soo-wa talli kongsa kyubyelhay 119-ey ilpan simin-ui casey-ro chimchak-kakey sinko-hay-ss-ta” Democratic party reports that unlike Kim Moon-soo, Lee Jae-myung knew how to draw a line between private and public affairs. Open News Report. [URL]
Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J.
1984 “Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, E.
2017 “The Interactional Achievement of Tellability: A Study of Story-openings.” Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquee 22(2): 89–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholt, M. & Hall, K.
2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choe, S-H.
2018, April 13. Sister of Korean ‘Nut Rage’ Heiress Accused of Throwing Her Own Tantrum. The New York Times. [URL]
Cromdal, J., Landqvist, H., Persson-Thunqvist, D., & Osvaldsson, K.
2012 “Finding out what’s happened: Two procedures for opening emergency calls.” Discourse Studies 14(4): 371–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, P.
1997 “Open Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28(1): 69–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
1984 “Notes on Story Structure and the Organization of Participation.” pp. 225–47. Atkinson & Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. & Goodwin, M.
2004 “Participation.” In A. Duranti (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 33–54). Stanford CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Heritage, J.
1984 “A Change of State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” pp. 299–345 Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heritage & Clayman
2010 “Talk in Action: Interaction, Identities, and Institutions.” United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. & Raymond, G.
2012 “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiesence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” pp. 179–192. Jan P. de Ruiter (ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I. & Barnett, S.
2005 “Aspects of the Sequential Organization of Mobile Phone Conversation.” Discourse Studies 7(2): 147–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jung, J-E.
2011, December 29. Jin Jungkwon “Kim Moon-soo cisa-tawesseya”..taytomin kongkaysakwa yokwu. “Jin Jungkwon says “Kim Moon-soo should have acted live a governor”… He should apologize to the do-residents. [URL]
Kent, A., & Antaki, C.
2019 “Police call-takers’ first substantive question projects the outcome of the call.” Applied Linguistics 41(5):640–661. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kevoe-Feldman, H.
2016 “Why are you concerned?” A consideration of turn distance and the organization of the interrogative series in “wellness check” calls to a university police department. Discourse Processes, 53(7): 556–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Inside the Emergency Service Call-Center: Reviewing Thirty Years of Language and Social Interaction Research.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 227–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kevoe-Feldman, H., & Pomerantz, A.
2018 Critical timing of actions for transferring 911 calls in a wireless call center. Discourse Studies, 20(4): 488–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. S.
2015 Resisting the terms of polar questions through ani (‘no’)-prefacing in Korean conversation. Discourse Processes, 52 (4), 311–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, J-H.
2019, March 15. 119 shinko hankang twusinca-ey swuyenghamwe cenhwa cal-hanta…taywon 3 myeng cingkye. “119 call han river drownee “you’re calling while swimming?”…three officers under disciplinary measures. Yonhap news. [URL]
Kim, K-H.
2021 Rume hwaksaney Lee Jae-myung aney tonghwa saeyngjungkey, 119 nokum-to kongkae ‘Against false rumors Lee Jae-myung reveals phone conversations with wife and 119 recordings.’ Chosun ilbo. [URL]
Kim, T-H., Kim, J-G., Woo, N-G., & J-H. Kim
2017 “A study on the improvement of work and training to make better Korean 119 dispatcher’s response ability.” Journal of the Society of Disaster Information. 13 (4): 550–561.Google Scholar
Koole, T., and Verberg, N.
2017 “Aligning Caller and Call-taker.” Pragmatics and Society, 8(1): 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laforest, M.
2012 “The False Report during an Emergency Call: Using Discourse Analysis to Detect Deceit.” Proceedings of the International Association of Forensic Linguists’ Tenth Biennal Conference, Birmingham, Center of forensic linguistics, pp. 139–152.
Lee, S.-H.
2006 “Second summoning in Korean telephone conversation openings.” Language in Society, 351, 261–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
1987 “Analyzing single episodes of conversation: an exercise in conversation analysis.” Social Psychology Quarterly 501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, S.
1989 The sexual (re)production of meaning: A discourse-based theory. Pp. 35–50. In F. W. Frank and P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Language, gender and professional writing: Theoretical approaches and guidelines for nonsexist usage. New York: MLA Publications.Google Scholar
2002 “Queering’ Semantics: Definitional Struggles. pp. 137–160. In K. Campbell-Kibler, R. Podesva, S. Roberts, and A. Wong (eds.), Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, CSLI.Google Scholar
Meehan, A. J.
1983 “Assessing the “police-worthiness” of citizen’s complaints to the police: accountability and the negotiation of “facts”” pp. 116–140. In D. Helm (ed.), The Interactional Order: New Directions in the Study of Social Orders, Irvington, New York.Google Scholar
Raymond, G. & Zimmerman, D.
2016 “Closing matters: Alignment and misalignment in sequence and call closings in institutional interaction.” Discourse Studies, 18(6), 716–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
1974 “An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation.” pp. 337–53. In J. Sherzer, R. Bauman, (eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1992 “Lectures on Conversation.” Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
1979 “Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings.” pp.23–78. In G. Psathas (ed.), “Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology.” New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
1986 “The Routine as Achievement.” Human Studies, 91, 111–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, K.
1997 “Interactional trouble in emergency service requests,” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(4):315–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, K., & Agne, R. R.
2002 “ ‘I Just Need to Ask Somebody Some Questions’: Sensitivities in Domestic Dispute Calls.” pp. 75–90. In Cotterill, J. (eds.) Language in the Legal Process. Palgrave Macmillan: London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalen, J., D. H. Zimmerman, & M. R. Whalen
1988 “When words fail: A single case analysis.” Social Problems, 35 (4), 335–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalen, J. & D. H. Zimmerman
1987 “Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help.” Social Psychology Quarterly 501: 172–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, D.
1992 “The Interactional Organization of Calls for Emergency Service.” In Drew and Heritage, Talk at Work.Google Scholar
Whalen, J., Zimmerman, D. and Whalen, M.
1988 “When Words Fail: A Single Case Analysis,” Social Problems, 35(4): 335–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar