This paper revisits the case of “Focus-movement” as manifested in one of its best-studied instances, Hungarian, and assesses it in relation to views of Abar movement within Chomsky’s (1995, 2000) Minimalist Program. I examine whether the movement is due to a formal [Focus] feature, and provide detailed argumentation against this hypothesis. The paper motivates the proposal that the movement involves a distinct quantificational “Exhaustive Identification” (EI) operator, which interacts with Focus only indirectly. It claims that the [EI] operator feature projects a clausal functional head that drives the syntactic movement construed mistakenly in the literature to be Focus-driven movement. After a cross-linguistic exploration of Focus-related movements, the paper evaluates the implications for the tenability of purely interface-based treatments of Focus.
2018. Focus in Focus. In Boundaries Crossed, at the Interfaces of Morphosyntax, Phonology, Pragmatics and Semantics [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 94], ► pp. 243 ff.
Torrego, Esther
2018. Phasehood and Romance AdverbialBecause-Clauses. In Language, Syntax, and the Natural Sciences, ► pp. 99 ff.
Fominyam, Henry & Radek Šimík
2017. The morphosyntax of exhaustive focus. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35:4 ► pp. 1027 ff.
Horvath, Julia
2017. Pied‐Piping. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff.
Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara
2016. The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure,
Kotek, Hadas & Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine
2016. Covert Pied-Piping in English Multiple Wh-Questions. Linguistic Inquiry 47:4 ► pp. 669 ff.
Bayer, Josef, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke
2015. The syntax of Why-Stripping. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33:1 ► pp. 323 ff.
Gerőcs, Mátyás, Anna Babarczy & and Balázs Surányi
2014. Exhaustivity in Focus: Experimental Evidence from Hungarian. In Language Use and Linguistic Structure, ► pp. 181 ff.
Temmerman, Tanja
2013. The syntax of Dutch embedded fragment answers: on the PF-theory of islands and the wh/sluicing correlation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31:1 ► pp. 235 ff.
Cable, Seth
2012. Pied‐Piping: Introducing Two Recent Approaches. Language and Linguistics Compass 6:12 ► pp. 816 ff.
Fanselow, Gisbert & Denisa Lenertová
2011. Left peripheral focus: mismatches between syntax and information structure. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29:1 ► pp. 169 ff.
Kenesei, István
2009. Quantifiers, negation, and focus on the left periphery in Hungarian. Lingua 119:4 ► pp. 564 ff.
Kenesei, István
2010. Erratum to “Quantifiers, negation, and focus on the left periphery in Hungarian” [Lingua 119 (2009) 564–591]. Lingua 120:7 ► pp. 1858 ff.
Balogh, Kata
2007. Focus and ‘Only’ in Hungarian. In Logic, Language, and Computation [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4363], ► pp. 31 ff.
Balogh, Kata
2013. Hungarian Pre-verbal Focus and Exhaustivity. In New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7856], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.