This paper examines the left and right periphery in Dutch imperatives. Rightperipheral objects in Dutch imperatives are argued to arise from the interaction of leftward topicalisation into the left periphery, inversion and topic drop, licensed under movement of the verb to the Topic head. An examination of reconstruction effects establishes the movement characteristics of right-peripheral objects. Differences between the reduced left periphery of Dutch (only a dropped topic is allowed to precede the imperative verb) and German (one overt topic may precede the imperative) are argued to be due to the landing site of the imperative verb form, and slightly different pied-piping confi gurations which allow an imperative verb to “type” imperative force.
2021. How Much Room for Discourse in Imperative? The Lens of Interface on English, Italian and Spanish*. Studia Linguistica 75:3 ► pp. 375 ff.
PAUL, ILEANA & DIANE MASSAM
2021. Licensing null arguments in recipes across languages. Journal of Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 815 ff.
Angelopoulos, Nikos
2019. Reconstructing Clitic Doubling. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1
Ott, Dennis & Mark de Vries
2016. Right-dislocation as deletion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34:2 ► pp. 641 ff.
Orfitelli, Robyn & Nina Hyams
2012. Children’s Grammar of Null Subjects: Evidence from Comprehension. Linguistic Inquiry 43:4 ► pp. 563 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.