The complement of reduced parentheticals

Christian Fortmann | Universität Stuttgart

This contribution is concerned with a quite frequent type of parenthetical construction in German like Theo kam – sagt Paul – mit seinem Hund (Theo brought – says Paul – his dog). The propositional argument of the parenthetical verb is not saturated within the boundaries of the parenthetical string. However, its interpretative content is provided by the host clause. I argue that the missing argument is nevertheless present in the syntactic representation. Two possible modes of representation, namely by an implicit argument or by a trace/copy of the host, are rejected in favour of a representation by an empty pronominal which is anaphorically linked to the host. Based on this account, I further discuss apparent restrictions on the lexical choice of the parenthetical verb and its co-constituents.

Published online: 26 July 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.106.07for

Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Dehé, Nicole

2018. The prosodic phrasing of parenthetical comment clauses in spontaneous spoken language: evidence from icelandicheld ég. Studia Linguistica 72:1 ► pp. 128 ff.

Fortmann, Christian

2011. Die Suggestion der Theorie – Satzmodus-(In)Kongruenz bei Parenthesen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Griffiths, James

2015. Parenthetical verb constructions, fragment answers, and constituent modification. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33:1 ► pp. 191 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.