The paper focuses on and-parenthetical clauses. It opens with a discussion on their typical places of interpolation and recognises two major types: a) anchored parentheticals and b) floating parentheticals. The and-clauses are then contrasted to coordination proper. The syntactic relation of the parenthetical with the host is examined in the context of the integrated and the unintegrated approaches, but only to demonstrate that none of them is satisfactory. Instead, I refer to the Insertion theory of Ackema and Neeleman (2004) to accommodate andparentheticals. Finally, this paper analyses the speaker’s motivation behind using such cumbersome interruptions and I conclude that it is in line with his aim at optimal relevance. The examples presented in this study are collected from two English corpora.
2016. Integrated Parentheticals in Quotations and Free Indirect Discourse. In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 5], ► pp. 471 ff.
2021. A Study of Internally-Headed RCs Focusing on the Formal Restrictions and the Semantic Extension to Adverbial Clauses. Lanaguage Research 57:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. Ways of Structure Building, ► pp. 424 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. Abbreviations. In Ways of Structure Building, ► pp. xvii ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. Notes on Contributors. In Ways of Structure Building, ► pp. xiii ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. Copyright Page. In Ways of Structure Building, ► pp. vi ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. General Preface. In Ways of Structure Building, ► pp. xi ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.