In Modern Greek, clitic doubling is a grammatical device that marks clitic doubled object NPs as topics. Clitic doubling involving the fronting of the clitic doubled NP is called topicalization or, if combined with a boundary pause, topic left-dislocation. Topic left-dislocation is obligatory in the presence of a preverbal focused NP. Clitic doubling involving the backing of the clitic doubled NP is called backgrounding or, if combined with a boundary pause, topic right-dislocation. Right-dislocated topics are interpreted as an afterthought. In Ancient Greek, clitic doubling was an occasional mnemotechnic device to clarify the referent of a left-dislocated topic usually separated by an intervening clause from the verb on which it depended. Topic right-dislocation existed in Ancient Greek as a device to clarify or specify the referent of a clitic pronoun. The grammaticalization of clitic doubling can be traced back to the use of hanging topics, in which case the doubling clitic was needed to specify the grammatical relation of the corresponding hanging topic as direct or indirect object. The construction was grammaticalized in the Medieval period, when clitic doubling positively marked clitic doubled NPs as topics. In Asia Minor Greek, clitic doubling serves exactly the same purposes as in Medieval and Standard Modern Greek. Turkish interference appears in the existence of a definite and an indefinite accusative to mark topic and focus respectively and possibly the preponderance of SOV as the unmarked order.
2023. A dialectometric approach to inner Asia Minor Greek: Comparisons and associations between linguistic levels. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 38:4 ► pp. 1389 ff.
Sitaridou, Ioanna & Jerneja Kavčič
2023. Petnajst let terenskih raziskav romejščine: ključne ugotovitve o jeziku ter o njegovem razvoju, vitalnosti in možnostih preživetja. Keria: Studia Latina et Graeca 25:2 ► pp. 9 ff.
Janse, Mark & Johan Vandewalle
2020. The History and Etymology of Cappadocian Fšáx ‘Child’, Pharasiot Fšáxi ‘Boy’. Transactions of the Philological Society 118:3 ► pp. 500 ff.
Capone, Alessandro
2019. The Clitic ‘lo’ in Italian, Propositional Attitudes and Presuppositions. In Pragmatics and Philosophy. Connections and Ramifications [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 22], ► pp. 289 ff.
2016. From syntagmatic to paradigmatic spatial zeroes: The loss of the prepositionsein inner Asia Minor Greek. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 69:2 ► pp. 309 ff.
2012. Null vs. cognate objects and language contact: Evidence from Hellenistic Greek. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 44:2 ► pp. 142 ff.
Soltic, Jorie
2012. The distribution of object clitic pronouns in the Grottaferrata manuscript of Digenis Akritis. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 36:2 ► pp. 178 ff.
Soltic, Jorie
2013. Clitic Doubling in Vernacular Medieval Greek. Transactions of the Philological Society 111:3 ► pp. 379 ff.
Soltic, Jorie
2014. The Particle γάρ: From Ancient Greek Sentence Connector to Blatant Line Filler? A Case-study on the Late Medieval GreekChronicle of Morea. Symbolae Osloenses 88:1 ► pp. 136 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.