In this introductory chapter some of the main (dis)similarities in DP-syntax between the Germanic and Romance languages, as well as between the individual languages of each group, are explored. We take a look at the following subjects: (a) the ways in which the various languages express definiteness; (b) the position of adjectives; (c) the function of the weak declension of adjectives in Germanic; (d) the evolution of genitive equivalents; and (e) the emergence of determining possessives in Germanic. In each case we try to find out whether a given construction is inherited from the parent language or is an independent development in each of the languages or language groups. Special attention is paid to common developments after the languages split up into separate entities, since they might indicate some inherent properties of human language that restrict the way in which languages may develop.
2022. Probing the role of bounding, definiteness and other factors: bare noun and determiner use in Guianese French Creole. CogniTextes :Volume 23
Grabski, Maciej
2015. The position of negative adjectives in Aelfric’s Catholic Homilies I .. Research in Language 13:4 ► pp. 392 ff.
Lander, Eric T. & Liliane Haegeman
2014. Old Norse as anNPLanguage: With Observations on the Common Norse and Northwest Germanic Runic Inscriptions. Transactions of the Philological Society 112:3 ► pp. 279 ff.
Van de Velde, Freek, Petra Sleeman & Harry Perridon
2013. MORPHOLOGY OF DIRECT MODIFICATION. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 30:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.