Discourse under control in ambiguous sentences
Sentences with more than one logic operator may be ambiguous between different interpretations and a recent research question is whether children have access to all the possible readings available to adults. Early studies focused on the interpretation of nominal quantifiers and negation, suggesting that children may have only a subset of the possible meanings of a logically ambiguous sentence. In this paper, we extend the inquiry to the interactions between modals and negation. We report on two experiments. In the first, we tested children’s interpretation of the Italian modal potere followed by clausal negation, a construction which results unambiguous in the adult language and not compatible with a reading expressing impossibility. In a second experiment, we manipulated the context in order to evaluate the effects of the Question Answer Requirement (Husley et al. 2004) on children’s scope assignment.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Moscati, Vincenzo, Jacopo Romoli, Tommaso Federico Demarie & Stephen Crain
2016.
Born in the USA: a comparison of modals and nominal quantifiers in child language.
Natural Language Semantics 24:1
► pp. 79 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Moscati, Vincenzo & Stephen Crain
2014.
When Negation and Epistemic Modality Combine: The Role of Information Strength in Child Language.
Language Learning and Development 10:4
► pp. 345 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.