Discourse under control in ambiguous sentences
Sentences with more than one logic operator may be ambiguous between different interpretations and a recent research question is whether children have access to all the possible readings available to adults. Early studies focused on the interpretation of nominal quantifiers and negation, suggesting that children may have only a subset of the possible meanings of a logically ambiguous sentence. In this paper, we extend the inquiry to the interactions between modals and negation. We report on two experiments. In the first, we tested children’s interpretation of the Italian modal potere followed by clausal negation, a construction which results unambiguous in the adult language and not compatible with a reading expressing impossibility. In a second experiment, we manipulated the context in order to evaluate the effects of the Question Answer Requirement (Husley et al. 2004) on children’s scope assignment.
Cited by 2 other publications
Moscati, Vincenzo & Stephen Crain
. When Negation and Epistemic Modality Combine: The Role of Information Strength in Child Language
. Language Learning and Development
pp. 345 ff.
Moscati, Vincenzo, Jacopo Romoli, Tommaso Federico Demarie & Stephen Crain
. Born in the USA: a comparison of modals and nominal quantifiers in child language
. Natural Language Semantics
pp. 79 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.