Many grammatical phenomena occur only in “root clauses,” i.e., main clauses and a limited type of embedded clauses called indirect discourse. Among these are certain transformational movements. Earlier generative studies stipulate that root transformational movements are simply exempt from constraints on landing sites of movements.
Two recent more restrictive theories remedy this. Rizzi (1997) restricts landing sites to SPEC and head positions of specially labeled projections such as TopP and FocP. Emonds (2004) proposes rather that such root projections (“Discourse Shells”) have no labels. This essay argues that root movements are then subject, like all others, to Structure Preservation, and that their landing sites are better conceived as SPECs and heads of “label-less” or a-categorial projections. Keywords: discourse shell; dislocation; focus movement; German Verb-second; head movement; left periphery; rightward movement; root transformation; structure-preservation; tensed-S constraint; topicalization
2017. Adjectival and Analytic Passives. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff.
Stringer, David
2015. EMBEDDEDWH-QUESTIONS IN L2 ENGLISH IN INDIA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
Ambar, Manuela
2014. Yes-No Questions, Subjects, Adverbs, and the Left Periphery: New Evidence from Portuguese1. In Language Use and Linguistic Structure, ► pp. 15 ff.
and Jiménez-Fernández, Victoria Camacho-Taboada Ángel L.
2014. Focus Fronting and Root Phenomena in Spanish and English. In Language Use and Linguistic Structure, ► pp. 47 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.