Article published in:
Main Clause Phenomena: New HorizonsEdited by Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman and Rachel Nye
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190] 2012
► pp. 297–318
The status of complementizers in the left periphery
Maria Rita Manzini | Dipartimento SAMeRL Università di Firenze
In Section 1 we argue that the nominal nature of complementizers in many languages (notably wh-items in Romance) points to the conclusion that this extra embedding layer is nominal (cf. Rosenbaum 1967). In Section 2 we address the question whether the structures they create are more similar to headed relatives (Arsenijević 2009; Kayne 2010, to appear) or to free relatives (Manzini & Savoia 2003, 2005, 2011). In Section 3 we consider some of the empirical reasons that would recommend distinguishing between complementizers and wh-items, including selection, islands and order in the left periphery. We also consider finiteness restrictions (Section 4). In Section 5 we conclude by indicating what this line of research implies for Main Clause Phenomena.
Published online: 27 June 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.13man
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.190.13man
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia
Bayer, Josef & Probal Dasgupta
Manzini, Maria Rita & Leonardo Maria Savoia
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.