This paper proposes an interface approach to (pseudo)cleft constructions, in which their semantic, syntactic, discourse and intonational properties are examined in a cross-linguistic perspective. Following most influential studies, the relevant constructions are analyzed as specificational copular sentences, in which the two major constituents – a (free) relative DP and the (to be) focused phrase – are merged in a SC structure. However, based on formal evidence and discourse considerations, we take the clefted constituent to be merged as the predicate of the relevant construction, thus departing from the general view. Finally, (pseudo)clefts are also shown to imply a Topic strategy. This proposal is substantiated by intonational investigation, showing a crucial correlation between tonal events and the information-structural articulation activated by clefting. Keywords: Focus; interface; (pseudo)clefts; specificational copular sentences; (different types of) Topic(s)
2021. An unusual cleft construction in Lakhota (Siouan, North America). Faits de Langues 52:1 ► pp. 255 ff.
Hopp, Holger, Joseph Bail & Carrie N. Jackson
2020. Frequency at the syntax–discourse interface: A bidirectional study on fronting options in L1/L2 German and L1/L2 English. Second Language Research 36:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Pinelli, Maria Cristina, Cecilia Poletto & Cinzia Avesani
2020. Does prosody meet syntax? A case study on standard Italian cleft sentences and left peripheral focus. The Linguistic Review 37:2 ► pp. 309 ff.
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A. & Karen De Clercq
2019. From negative cleft to external negator. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 228 ff.
Batllori, Montserrat, Elisabeth Gibert-Sotelo & Isabel Pujol
2019. Changes in the argument and event structure of psych verbs in the history of Spanish. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 249 ff.
Bernstein, Judy, Francisco Ordóñez & Francesc Roca
2019. On the emergence of personal articles in the history of Catalan. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 88 ff.
Blümel, Andreas & Marco Coniglio
2019. What kind of constructions yield what kind of constructions?. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 131 ff.
Miriam Bouzouita, Anne Breitbarth, Lieven Danckaert & Elisabeth Witzenhausen
2019. Cycles in Language Change,
Breitbarth, Anne, Lieven Danckaert, Elisabeth Witzenhausen & Miriam Bouzouita
2019. Cycling through diachrony. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 1 ff.
De Clercq, Karen
2019. French negation, the Superset Principle, and Feature Conservation. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 199 ff.
Fischer, Susann, Mario Navarro & Jorge Vega Vilanova
2019. The clitic doubling parameter. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 52 ff.
Fuß, Eric
2019. When morphological and syntactic change are not in sync. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 33 ff.
Garzonio, Jacopo & Silvia Rossi
2019. Weak elements in cycles. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 71 ff.
Kinn, Kari
2019. Bare singular nouns in Middle Norwegian. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 109 ff.
Moreno, Mitrović
2019. Quantificational cycles and shifts. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 155 ff.
Poletto, Cecilia & Emanuela Sanfelici
2019. On the relative cycle. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 177 ff.
van Gelderen, Elly
2019. Cyclical change and problems of projection. In Cycles in Language Change, ► pp. 13 ff.
Karssenberg, Lena, Karen Lahousse, Béatrice Lamiroy, Stefania Marzo & Ana Drobnjakovic
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.