The information structure of English cleft sentences is discussed. A cleft sentence divides a proposition into two parts, which are interpreted as an exhaustive focus and a pragmatic presupposition. These two semantic components can be flexibly mapped onto the information structure categories of topic and comment to arrive at comment-topic (‘stressed focus’) clefts and topic-comment (‘informative presupposition’) clefts. Clefts thus introduce a cleft focus or even a pair of foci constructionally. They also exhibit an assertive (comment) focus, which may or may not correspond to the cleft focus. While only exclusive focus particles can associate with the cleft focus, additive and scalar focus particles can associate with the assertive focus in the cleft clause, thus giving rise to additional cleft sentences containing multiple instances of focus. Keywords: cleft; focus; presupposition; topic
Colonna, Saveria, Sarah Schimke & Barbara Hemforth
2015. Different effects of focus in intra- and inter-sentential pronoun resolution in German. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30:10 ► pp. 1306 ff.
2023. Conclusion. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts, ► pp. 155 ff.
De Cesare, Anna-Maria & Davide Garassino
2015. On the status of exhaustiveness in cleft sentences: An empirical and cross-linguistic study of English also-/only-clefts and Italian anche-/solo-clefts. Folia Linguistica 49:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Destruel, Emilie, David I. Beaver & Elizabeth Coppock
2019. It's Not What You Expected! The Surprising Nature of Cleft Alternatives in French and English. Frontiers in Psychology 10
Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara
2014. ,
Gheorghe, Mihaela
2017. (Pseudo)cleft constructions in old Romanian. Diacronia :6
Gheorghe, Mihaela
2017. Construcții (pseudo)scindate în româna veche. Diacronia :6
Gécseg, Zsuzsanna
2020. Focused Topics in Hungarian: Reconsidering the Pragmatic Relevance of the Structural Focus Position1. Studia Linguistica 74:3 ► pp. 740 ff.
Karssenberg, Lena, Karen Lahousse, Béatrice Lamiroy, Stefania Marzo & Ana Drobnjakovic
Karssenberg, Lena, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. ‘Il n’y a que Superman qui porte le slip par-dessus le pantalon’ – les clivées enil n’y a que x qui. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 02009 ff.
Kumamoto, Chiaki
2012. REFERENTIALITY OF THE PRONOUNS IT AND THAT IN COPULAR SENTENCES. Discourse and Interaction 5:2 ► pp. 35 ff.
Sekerina, Irina A., Luca Campanelli & Julie A. Van Dyke
2016. Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Retrieval Interference in Spoken Language Comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 7
Yan, Mengzhu & Sasha Calhoun
2019. Priming Effects of Focus in Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology 10
Yan, Mengzhu, Paul Warren & Sasha Calhoun
2022. Focus interpretation in L1 and L2: The role of prosodic prominence and clefting. Applied Psycholinguistics 43:6 ► pp. 1275 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.